| Message ID | 1406298233-27876-5-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:23:53PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > ... describing the root of the device tree, so one can write > a platform driver initializing the platform. Wait, what do you mean by "one can write a platform driver initializing the platform"? I don't understand your end goal here... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:23:53PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > ... describing the root of the device tree, so one can write > a platform driver initializing the platform. > > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com> > --- > drivers/base/platform.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ > include/linux/platform_device.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c > index eee48c4..9caffa7 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c > @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ > /* For automatically allocated device IDs */ > static DEFINE_IDA(platform_devid_ida); > > -struct device platform_bus = { > - .init_name = "platform", > +struct platform_device platform_bus = { > + .name = "platform", > }; > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_bus); > > @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ int platform_device_add(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -EINVAL; > > if (!pdev->dev.parent) > - pdev->dev.parent = &platform_bus; > + pdev->dev.parent = &platform_bus.dev; > > pdev->dev.bus = &platform_bus_type; > > @@ -946,12 +946,20 @@ int __init platform_bus_init(void) > > early_platform_cleanup(); > > - error = device_register(&platform_bus); > + dev_set_name(&platform_bus.dev, "%s", platform_bus.name); > + error = device_register(&platform_bus.dev); > if (error) > return error; > error = bus_register(&platform_bus_type); > - if (error) > - device_unregister(&platform_bus); > + if (!error) { > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > + platform_bus.dev.of_node = of_allnodes; > +#endif Why are you doing this? The original code didn't do it and all was fine, right? What changes here? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 21:13 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > @@ -946,12 +946,20 @@ int __init platform_bus_init(void) > > > > early_platform_cleanup(); > > > > - error = device_register(&platform_bus); > > + dev_set_name(&platform_bus.dev, "%s", platform_bus.name); > > + error = device_register(&platform_bus.dev); > > if (error) > > return error; > > error = bus_register(&platform_bus_type); > > - if (error) > > - device_unregister(&platform_bus); > > + if (!error) { > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > > + platform_bus.dev.of_node = of_allnodes; > > +#endif > > Why are you doing this? The original code didn't do it and all was > fine, right? What changes here? You mean the #ifdef? It wasn't there, but Olof figured out that it breaks !CONFIG_OF builds: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.tegra/18473 as of_allnodes is only defined when CONFIG_OF. I had a choice of #ifdefing the assignment above or providing a dummy symbol. The latter doesn't seem sensibly, as there should be no other users for it (the symbol). Pawel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 21:12 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:23:53PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > > ... describing the root of the device tree, so one can write > > a platform driver initializing the platform. > > Wait, what do you mean by "one can write a platform driver initializing > the platform"? I don't understand your end goal here... Bad wording, sorry. The goal is to have a platform driver (as in platform bus) that will initialize my platform (as in: board, machine, hardware). My platform (as in: the board) will be represented by the root platform bus device (as in: the bus ;-) with compatible value matching the one passed in the device tree's root. The tree: 8<---------------------------- / { compatible = "my,board"; } 8<---------------------------- The driver: 8<---------------------------- static struct of_device_id my_board_match[] = { { .compatible = "my,board", }, {}, }; static struct platform_driver my_board_driver = { .driver = { .name = "my_board", .owner = THIS_MODULE, .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(my_board_match), }, .probe = my_board_probe, .remove = my_board_remove, }; module_platform_driver(my_board_driver); 8<---------------------------- I'll work on better commit message for the next spin. Paweł -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c index eee48c4..9caffa7 100644 --- a/drivers/base/platform.c +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ /* For automatically allocated device IDs */ static DEFINE_IDA(platform_devid_ida); -struct device platform_bus = { - .init_name = "platform", +struct platform_device platform_bus = { + .name = "platform", }; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_bus); @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ int platform_device_add(struct platform_device *pdev) return -EINVAL; if (!pdev->dev.parent) - pdev->dev.parent = &platform_bus; + pdev->dev.parent = &platform_bus.dev; pdev->dev.bus = &platform_bus_type; @@ -946,12 +946,20 @@ int __init platform_bus_init(void) early_platform_cleanup(); - error = device_register(&platform_bus); + dev_set_name(&platform_bus.dev, "%s", platform_bus.name); + error = device_register(&platform_bus.dev); if (error) return error; error = bus_register(&platform_bus_type); - if (error) - device_unregister(&platform_bus); + if (!error) { +#ifdef CONFIG_OF + platform_bus.dev.of_node = of_allnodes; +#endif + platform_bus.dev.bus = &platform_bus_type; + bus_add_device(&platform_bus.dev); + } else { + device_unregister(&platform_bus.dev); + } return error; } diff --git a/include/linux/platform_device.h b/include/linux/platform_device.h index 16f6654..a99032a 100644 --- a/include/linux/platform_device.h +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ extern int platform_device_register(struct platform_device *); extern void platform_device_unregister(struct platform_device *); extern struct bus_type platform_bus_type; -extern struct device platform_bus; +extern struct platform_device platform_bus; extern void arch_setup_pdev_archdata(struct platform_device *); extern struct resource *platform_get_resource(struct platform_device *,
... describing the root of the device tree, so one can write a platform driver initializing the platform. Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com> --- drivers/base/platform.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ include/linux/platform_device.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)