Message ID | 1467968852-6175-3-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 08/07/16 10:07, Linus Walleij wrote: > The SMSC911x have a line out of the chip called "PME", > Power Management Event. When connected to an asynchronous > interrupt controller this is able to wake the system up > from sleep in response to certain network events. > > This is the first attempt to support this in the Linux > driver: the Qualcomm APQ8060 Dragonboard has this line > routed to a GPIO line on the primary SoC padring, and as > such it can be armed as a wakeup interrupt. > > The patch is inspired by the wakeup code in the RTC > subsystem. > > The code looks for an additional interrupt - apart from the > ordinary device interrupt - and in case that is present, > we register an interrupt handler to respons to this, > and flag the device and this interrupt as a wakeup. > > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> > Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > Added some wakeup people at CC who can (hopefully) tell me if > I'm doing this right or not. > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c > index 125d58ac22bd..e43755ae130a 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c [...] > @@ -2525,6 +2540,33 @@ static int smsc911x_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto out_disable_resources; > } > > + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1); > + if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) { > + retval = -EPROBE_DEFER; > + goto out_disable_resources; > + /* It's perfectly fine to not have a PME IRQ */ > + } else if (irq > 0) { > + char *pme_name; > + > + /* > + * The Power Management Event (PME) IRQ appears as > + * a pulse waking up the system from sleep in response to a > + * network event. > + */ > + retval = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, > + smsc911x_pme_irq_thread, > + IRQF_ONESHOT, "smsc911x-pme", > + dev); > + if (retval) { > + SMSC_WARN(pdata, probe, > + "Unable to claim requested PME irq: %d", irq); > + goto out_disable_resources; > + } > + pdata->pme_irq = irq; > + device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, true); > + dev_pm_set_wake_irq(&pdev->dev, irq); > + } > + > netif_carrier_off(dev); > > retval = register_netdev(dev); > @@ -2613,6 +2655,9 @@ static int smsc911x_suspend(struct device *dev) > PMT_CTRL_PM_MODE_D1_ | PMT_CTRL_WOL_EN_ | > PMT_CTRL_ED_EN_ | PMT_CTRL_PME_EN_); > > + if (pdata->pme_irq && device_may_wakeup(dev)) > + enable_irq_wake(pdata->pme_irq); > + Based on my understanding of dev_pm_{set,clear}_wake_irq, we don't need this and the below hunk. It's taken care in device_wakeup_arm_wake_irqs which is called from suspend_enter---->dpm_suspend_noirq path once you have done the setup with dev_pm_set_wake_irq and is enabled both of which is true in your case. > return 0; > } > > @@ -2622,6 +2667,9 @@ static int smsc911x_resume(struct device *dev) > struct smsc911x_data *pdata = netdev_priv(ndev); > unsigned int to = 100; > > + if (pdata->pme_irq && device_may_wakeup(dev)) > + disable_irq_wake(pdata->pme_irq); > + Same as above. -- Regards, Sudeep
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c index 125d58ac22bd..e43755ae130a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> #include <linux/property.h> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> +#include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h> #include "smsc911x.h" @@ -153,6 +154,9 @@ struct smsc911x_data { /* Reset GPIO */ struct gpio_desc *reset_gpiod; + /* PME interrupt */ + int pme_irq; + /* clock */ struct clk *clk; }; @@ -1882,6 +1886,17 @@ static irqreturn_t smsc911x_irqhandler(int irq, void *dev_id) return serviced; } +static irqreturn_t smsc911x_pme_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id) +{ + struct net_device *dev = dev_id; + struct smsc911x_data *pdata __maybe_unused = netdev_priv(dev); + + SMSC_TRACE(pdata, pm, "wakeup event"); + /* This signal is active for 50 ms, wait for it to deassert */ + usleep_range(50000, 100000); + return IRQ_HANDLED; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER static void smsc911x_poll_controller(struct net_device *dev) { @@ -2525,6 +2540,33 @@ static int smsc911x_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto out_disable_resources; } + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1); + if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) { + retval = -EPROBE_DEFER; + goto out_disable_resources; + /* It's perfectly fine to not have a PME IRQ */ + } else if (irq > 0) { + char *pme_name; + + /* + * The Power Management Event (PME) IRQ appears as + * a pulse waking up the system from sleep in response to a + * network event. + */ + retval = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, + smsc911x_pme_irq_thread, + IRQF_ONESHOT, "smsc911x-pme", + dev); + if (retval) { + SMSC_WARN(pdata, probe, + "Unable to claim requested PME irq: %d", irq); + goto out_disable_resources; + } + pdata->pme_irq = irq; + device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, true); + dev_pm_set_wake_irq(&pdev->dev, irq); + } + netif_carrier_off(dev); retval = register_netdev(dev); @@ -2613,6 +2655,9 @@ static int smsc911x_suspend(struct device *dev) PMT_CTRL_PM_MODE_D1_ | PMT_CTRL_WOL_EN_ | PMT_CTRL_ED_EN_ | PMT_CTRL_PME_EN_); + if (pdata->pme_irq && device_may_wakeup(dev)) + enable_irq_wake(pdata->pme_irq); + return 0; } @@ -2622,6 +2667,9 @@ static int smsc911x_resume(struct device *dev) struct smsc911x_data *pdata = netdev_priv(ndev); unsigned int to = 100; + if (pdata->pme_irq && device_may_wakeup(dev)) + disable_irq_wake(pdata->pme_irq); + /* Note 3.11 from the datasheet: * "When the LAN9220 is in a power saving state, a write of any * data to the BYTE_TEST register will wake-up the device."
The SMSC911x have a line out of the chip called "PME", Power Management Event. When connected to an asynchronous interrupt controller this is able to wake the system up from sleep in response to certain network events. This is the first attempt to support this in the Linux driver: the Qualcomm APQ8060 Dragonboard has this line routed to a GPIO line on the primary SoC padring, and as such it can be armed as a wakeup interrupt. The patch is inspired by the wakeup code in the RTC subsystem. The code looks for an additional interrupt - apart from the ordinary device interrupt - and in case that is present, we register an interrupt handler to respons to this, and flag the device and this interrupt as a wakeup. Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> --- Added some wakeup people at CC who can (hopefully) tell me if I'm doing this right or not. --- drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) -- 2.7.4