diff mbox

[v5,03/14] arm64/numa: add nid check for memory block

Message ID 1470647899-6324-4-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Leizhen (ThunderTown) Aug. 8, 2016, 9:18 a.m. UTC
Use the same tactic to cpu and numa-distance nodes.

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>

---
 arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

--
2.5.0


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Leizhen (ThunderTown) Aug. 10, 2016, 3:42 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2016/8/10 10:12, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2016/8/8 17:18, Zhen Lei wrote:

>> Use the same tactic to cpu and numa-distance nodes.

>>

>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>

>> ---

>>  arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 5 +++++

>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

>>

>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c

>> index c7fe3ec..2601660 100644

>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c

>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c

>> @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)

>>  {

>>  	int ret;

>>

>> +	if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {

>> +		pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);

>> +		return -EINVAL;

>> +	}

> 

> I think this check should be added to of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(), which before

> the numa_add_memblk() called, it's the same logic in of_numa_parse_cpu_nodes() and

> the node id is checked before calling numa_add_memblk() in ACPI.


Yes, you are right. This check is arch independent.

> 

> Thanks

> Hanjun

> 

> 

> 

> .

> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
index c7fe3ec..2601660 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
@@ -141,6 +141,11 @@  int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
 {
 	int ret;

+	if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
+		pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	ret = memblock_set_node(start, (end - start), &memblock.memory, nid);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		pr_err("NUMA: memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n",