diff mbox

Disable LTO note about strict aliasing

Message ID 2556813.xd8ElFlcmY@polaris
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Eric Botcazou Nov. 13, 2016, 10:31 p.m. UTC
It's the note issued by the -Wlto-type-mismatch warning:

q.ads:7:13: warning: type of 'q__proc' does not match original declaration [-
Wlto-type-mismatch]
   procedure Proc (A : Arr);
             ^
q.adb:7:3: note: 'q__proc' was previously declared here
   procedure Proc (A : Arr) is begin null; end;
   ^
q.adb:7:3: note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used

and it's a bit surprising that -fno-strict-aliasing cannot silence it.


Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline and 6 branch?


2016-11-13  Eric Botcazou  <ebotcazou@adacore.com>

lto/
	* lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_decls_2): Only issue note on strict
	aliasing if -fstrict-aliasing is enabled.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Comments

Richard Biener Nov. 14, 2016, 10:16 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
> It's the note issued by the -Wlto-type-mismatch warning:

>

> q.ads:7:13: warning: type of 'q__proc' does not match original declaration [-

> Wlto-type-mismatch]

>    procedure Proc (A : Arr);

>              ^

> q.adb:7:3: note: 'q__proc' was previously declared here

>    procedure Proc (A : Arr) is begin null; end;

>    ^

> q.adb:7:3: note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used

>

> and it's a bit surprising that -fno-strict-aliasing cannot silence it.


The issue is that we can have different -fstrict-aliasing status on
different functions
(from individual TUs).  I'm not sure if a -fno-strict-aliasing at
link/WPA time will
put them to that state.

> Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline and 6 branch?


Can you verify that a TU compiled with -fstrict-aliasing will link as
if -fno-strict-aliasing
if -fno-strict-aliasing is specified at link time?  We're also still
in a very weird state
of fixing TU compile flags via the optimize/target attribute to link
time while at the
same time still going through lto-opts.c and lto-wrapper "merging" of
those options.

That said, -Wno-lto-type-mismatch can be used to disable the warning as well.

Thanks,
Richard.

>

> 2016-11-13  Eric Botcazou  <ebotcazou@adacore.com>

>

> lto/

>         * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_decls_2): Only issue note on strict

>         aliasing if -fstrict-aliasing is enabled.

>

> --

> Eric Botcazou
Eric Botcazou Nov. 15, 2016, 9:47 a.m. UTC | #2
> Can you verify that a TU compiled with -fstrict-aliasing will link as

> if -fno-strict-aliasing if -fno-strict-aliasing is specified at link time?


Yes, it does:

eric@polaris:~/build/gcc/native> ~/install/gcc/bin/gcc -c t.c -O2 -flto
eric@polaris:~/build/gcc/native> ~/install/gcc/bin/gcc -o t t.o -O2 -save-
temps -fverbose-asm && grep strict-aliasing t.ltrans0.s
# -fstore-merging -fstrict-aliasing -fstrict-overflow
eric@polaris:~/build/gcc/native> ~/install/gcc/bin/gcc -o t t.o -O2 -fno-
strict-aliasing -save-temps -fverbose-asm && grep strict-aliasing t.ltrans0.s
# -fno-strict-aliasing -fverbose-asm -fltrans t.ltrans0.o

> That said, -Wno-lto-type-mismatch can be used to disable the warning as

> well.


Right, but the wording ("code may be misoptimized") is a bit scaring so I'd 
rather avoid it when possible.

-- 
Eric Botcazou
Richard Biener Nov. 15, 2016, 11:58 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> Can you verify that a TU compiled with -fstrict-aliasing will link as

>> if -fno-strict-aliasing if -fno-strict-aliasing is specified at link time?

>

> Yes, it does:

>

> eric@polaris:~/build/gcc/native> ~/install/gcc/bin/gcc -c t.c -O2 -flto

> eric@polaris:~/build/gcc/native> ~/install/gcc/bin/gcc -o t t.o -O2 -save-

> temps -fverbose-asm && grep strict-aliasing t.ltrans0.s

> # -fstore-merging -fstrict-aliasing -fstrict-overflow

> eric@polaris:~/build/gcc/native> ~/install/gcc/bin/gcc -o t t.o -O2 -fno-

> strict-aliasing -save-temps -fverbose-asm && grep strict-aliasing t.ltrans0.s

> # -fno-strict-aliasing -fverbose-asm -fltrans t.ltrans0.o


Yes, I know -fno-strict-aliasing is globally set, but will all -fstrict-aliasing
optimization attributes on functions be "overwritten"?  That is, are you
sure that when optimizing a function originally compiled with -fstrict-aliasing
that -fno-strict-aliasing is in effect?

>> That said, -Wno-lto-type-mismatch can be used to disable the warning as

>> well.

>

> Right, but the wording ("code may be misoptimized") is a bit scaring so I'd

> rather avoid it when possible.

>

> --

> Eric Botcazou
Eric Botcazou Nov. 15, 2016, 12:19 p.m. UTC | #4
> Yes, I know -fno-strict-aliasing is globally set, but will all

> -fstrict-aliasing optimization attributes on functions be "overwritten"? 

> That is, are you sure that when optimizing a function originally compiled

> with -fstrict-aliasing that -fno-strict-aliasing is in effect?


Do you mean with the "optimize" attribute or somesuch?  If so, I suppose not, 
if the attributes are properly saved and restored; otherwise, I don't really 
understand the question because I don't think that LTO saves the entire option 
state on a per-function basis.

-- 
Eric Botcazou
Richard Biener Nov. 15, 2016, 3:18 p.m. UTC | #5
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> Yes, I know -fno-strict-aliasing is globally set, but will all

>> -fstrict-aliasing optimization attributes on functions be "overwritten"?

>> That is, are you sure that when optimizing a function originally compiled

>> with -fstrict-aliasing that -fno-strict-aliasing is in effect?

>

> Do you mean with the "optimize" attribute or somesuch?  If so, I suppose not,

> if the attributes are properly saved and restored; otherwise, I don't really

> understand the question because I don't think that LTO saves the entire option

> state on a per-function basis.


Yes, it does since GCC 5 (or was it 6?).

Richard.

> --

> Eric Botcazou
diff mbox

Patch

commit 934002ff6d710418af4b7f993f6216e9406d82c2
Author: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Date:   Sun Nov 13 11:36:32 2016 +0100

    Fix for PB12-008 (disable LTO note on misoptimization with strict aliasing).

diff --git a/gcc/lto/lto-symtab.c b/gcc/lto/lto-symtab.c
index 94b919b..c8848a5 100644
--- a/gcc/lto/lto-symtab.c
+++ b/gcc/lto/lto-symtab.c
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@  lto_symtab_merge_decls_2 (symtab_node *first, bool diagnosed_p)
   if (diagnosed_p)
     inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (prevailing->decl),
 	    "%qD was previously declared here", prevailing->decl);
-  if (tbaa_p)
+  if (tbaa_p && flag_strict_aliasing)
     inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (prevailing->decl),
 	    "code may be misoptimized unless "
 	    "-fno-strict-aliasing is used");