Message ID | 1474221805-22599-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Hi Steven, Could you take a look at this patch, please? 2016-09-19 3:03 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>: > In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL > pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions. > > Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call > clk_disable() without NULL pointer check. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> > --- > > Changes in v4: > - Split into per-arch patches > > Changes in v3: > - Return only when clk is NULL. Do not take care of error pointer. > > Changes in v2: > - Rebase on Linux 4.6-rc1 > > arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c > index 3783058..392a59b 100644 > --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c > +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c > @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_enable); > > void clk_disable(struct clk *clk) > { > + if (!clk) > + return; > + > if (clk->ops && clk->ops->disable) > clk->ops->disable(clk); > } > -- > 1.9.1 > -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
Hi Steven, Ping again. Could you apply this, please? 2016-11-06 0:47 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>: > Hi Steven, > > Could you take a look at this patch, please? > > > 2016-09-19 3:03 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>: >> In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL >> pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions. >> >> Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call >> clk_disable() without NULL pointer check. >> >> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> >> --- >> >> Changes in v4: >> - Split into per-arch patches >> >> Changes in v3: >> - Return only when clk is NULL. Do not take care of error pointer. >> >> Changes in v2: >> - Rebase on Linux 4.6-rc1 >> >> arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c >> index 3783058..392a59b 100644 >> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c >> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c >> @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_enable); >> >> void clk_disable(struct clk *clk) >> { >> + if (!clk) >> + return; >> + >> if (clk->ops && clk->ops->disable) >> clk->ops->disable(clk); >> } >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> > > > > -- > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c index 3783058..392a59b 100644 --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_enable); void clk_disable(struct clk *clk) { + if (!clk) + return; + if (clk->ops && clk->ops->disable) clk->ops->disable(clk); }
In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions. Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call clk_disable() without NULL pointer check. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> --- Changes in v4: - Split into per-arch patches Changes in v3: - Return only when clk is NULL. Do not take care of error pointer. Changes in v2: - Rebase on Linux 4.6-rc1 arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) -- 1.9.1