diff mbox

[for-4.5,5/8] xen/arm: IRQ: rename release_irq in release_dt_irq

Message ID 1390581822-32624-6-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Julien Grall Jan. 24, 2014, 4:43 p.m. UTC
Rename the function and make the prototype consistent with request_dt_irq.

The new parameter (dev_id) will be used in a later patch to release the right
action when the support for multiple action will be added.

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
---
 xen/arch/arm/gic.c        |    4 ++--
 xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h |    1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Ian Campbell Feb. 19, 2014, 11:47 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 16:43 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:

Subject: s/in/to/

> Rename the function and make the prototype consistent with request_dt_irq.
> 
> The new parameter (dev_id) will be used in a later patch to release the right
> action when the support for multiple action will be added.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>

> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/gic.c        |    4 ++--
>  xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> index 58bcba3..2643b46 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> @@ -520,13 +520,13 @@ void gic_disable_cpu(void)
>      spin_unlock(&gic.lock);
>  }
>  
> -void __init release_irq(unsigned int irq)
> +void release_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq, const void *dev_id)
>  {
>      struct irq_desc *desc;
>      unsigned long flags;
>     struct irqaction *action;
>  
> -    desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +    desc = irq_to_desc(irq->irq);
>  
>      desc->handler->shutdown(desc);
>  
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
> index 7c20703..bd8aac1 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ int __init request_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq,
>                            void (*handler)(int, void *, struct cpu_user_regs *),
>                            const char *devname, void *dev_id);
>  int __init setup_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq, struct irqaction *new);

This patch implies that things can now be dynamically registered and
unregistered -- does this therefore need to become non-__init?

> +void release_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq, const void *dev_id);
>  
>  #endif /* _ASM_HW_IRQ_H */
>  /*
Julien Grall Feb. 19, 2014, 2:23 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Ian,

On 02/19/2014 11:47 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 16:43 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> 
> Subject: s/in/to/
> 
>> Rename the function and make the prototype consistent with request_dt_irq.
>>
>> The new parameter (dev_id) will be used in a later patch to release the right
>> action when the support for multiple action will be added.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>

Thanks.

>> ---
>>  xen/arch/arm/gic.c        |    4 ++--
>>  xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h |    1 +
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> index 58bcba3..2643b46 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> @@ -520,13 +520,13 @@ void gic_disable_cpu(void)
>>      spin_unlock(&gic.lock);
>>  }
>>  
>> -void __init release_irq(unsigned int irq)
>> +void release_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq, const void *dev_id)
>>  {
>>      struct irq_desc *desc;
>>      unsigned long flags;
>>     struct irqaction *action;
>>  
>> -    desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>> +    desc = irq_to_desc(irq->irq);
>>  
>>      desc->handler->shutdown(desc);
>>  
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
>> index 7c20703..bd8aac1 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ int __init request_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq,
>>                            void (*handler)(int, void *, struct cpu_user_regs *),
>>                            const char *devname, void *dev_id);
>>  int __init setup_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq, struct irqaction *new);
> 
> This patch implies that things can now be dynamically registered and
> unregistered -- does this therefore need to become non-__init?

Yes, I noticed that after I sent this patch series. I have a patch for
that which I will add on the next version.

Cheers,
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
index 58bcba3..2643b46 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
@@ -520,13 +520,13 @@  void gic_disable_cpu(void)
     spin_unlock(&gic.lock);
 }
 
-void __init release_irq(unsigned int irq)
+void release_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq, const void *dev_id)
 {
     struct irq_desc *desc;
     unsigned long flags;
    struct irqaction *action;
 
-    desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
+    desc = irq_to_desc(irq->irq);
 
     desc->handler->shutdown(desc);
 
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
index 7c20703..bd8aac1 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/irq.h
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@  int __init request_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq,
                           void (*handler)(int, void *, struct cpu_user_regs *),
                           const char *devname, void *dev_id);
 int __init setup_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq, struct irqaction *new);
+void release_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq, const void *dev_id);
 
 #endif /* _ASM_HW_IRQ_H */
 /*