| Message ID | 20190924174728.201464-1-ndesaulniers@google.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] hwmon: (applesmc) fix UB and udelay overflow | expand |
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:47:28AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > Fixes the following 2 issues in the driver: > 1. Left shifting a signed integer is undefined behavior. Unsigned > integral types should be used for bitwise operations. > 2. The delay scales from 0x0010 to 0x20000 by powers of 2, but udelay > will result in a linkage failure when given a constant that's greater > than 20000 (0x4E20). Agressive loop unrolling can fully unroll the > loop, resulting in later iterations overflowing the call to udelay. > > 2 is fixed via splitting the loop in two, iterating the first up to the > point where udelay would overflow, then switching to mdelay, as > suggested in Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst. > > Reported-by: Tomasz Paweł Gajc <tpgxyz@gmail.com> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/678 > Debugged-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> > --- > Changes V1 -> V2: > * The first loop in send_byte() needs to break out on the same condition > now. Technically, the loop condition could even be removed. The diff > looks funny because of the duplicated logic between existing and newly > added for loops. > > drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > index 183ff3d25129..c76adb504dff 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ > #define APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT 0x0010 > #define APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT 0x0100 > #define APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT 0x20000 > +#define APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX 20000 > > #define APPLESMC_READ_CMD 0x10 > #define APPLESMC_WRITE_CMD 0x11 > @@ -157,14 +158,23 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *applesmc_led_wq; > static int wait_read(void) > { > u8 status; > - int us; > - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > + unsigned int us; > + > + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { > udelay(us); > status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > /* read: wait for smc to settle */ > if (status & 0x01) > return 0; > } > + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ > + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > + mdelay(us); > + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > + /* read: wait for smc to settle */ > + if (status & 0x01) > + return 0; > + } > > pr_warn("wait_read() fail: 0x%02x\n", status); > return -EIO; > @@ -177,10 +187,10 @@ static int wait_read(void) > static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) > { > u8 status; > - int us; > + unsigned int us; > > outb(cmd, port); > - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { > udelay(us); > status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > /* write: wait for smc to settle */ > @@ -190,6 +200,23 @@ static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) > if (status & 0x04) > return 0; > /* timeout: give up */ > + if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX) > + break; > + /* busy: long wait and resend */ > + udelay(APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT); > + outb(cmd, port); > + } > + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ > + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > + mdelay(us); > + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > + /* write: wait for smc to settle */ > + if (status & 0x02) > + continue; > + /* ready: cmd accepted, return */ > + if (status & 0x04) > + return 0; > + /* timeout: give up */ > if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT) > break; > /* busy: long wait and resend */ > -- > 2.23.0.351.gc4317032e6-goog > This resolves the __bad_udelay appearance at -O3 for me. I am not familiar enough with this code to give a reviewed by though! Also, for some odd reason, I couldn't apply your patch with 'git apply': % curl -LSs https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190924174728.201464-1-ndesaulniers@google.com/raw | git apply error: corrupt patch at line 117 It looks like some of the '=' got changed into =3D and some spaces got changed into =20. Weird encoding glitch? Cheers, Nathan
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:38 AM Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:47:28AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > Fixes the following 2 issues in the driver: > > 1. Left shifting a signed integer is undefined behavior. Unsigned > > integral types should be used for bitwise operations. > > 2. The delay scales from 0x0010 to 0x20000 by powers of 2, but udelay > > will result in a linkage failure when given a constant that's greater > > than 20000 (0x4E20). Agressive loop unrolling can fully unroll the > > loop, resulting in later iterations overflowing the call to udelay. > > > > 2 is fixed via splitting the loop in two, iterating the first up to the > > point where udelay would overflow, then switching to mdelay, as > > suggested in Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst. > > > > Reported-by: Tomasz Paweł Gajc <tpgxyz@gmail.com> > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/678 > > Debugged-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> > > --- > > Changes V1 -> V2: > > * The first loop in send_byte() needs to break out on the same condition > > now. Technically, the loop condition could even be removed. The diff > > looks funny because of the duplicated logic between existing and newly > > added for loops. > > > > drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > > index 183ff3d25129..c76adb504dff 100644 > > --- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ > > #define APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT 0x0010 > > #define APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT 0x0100 > > #define APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT 0x20000 > > +#define APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX 20000 > > > > #define APPLESMC_READ_CMD 0x10 > > #define APPLESMC_WRITE_CMD 0x11 > > @@ -157,14 +158,23 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *applesmc_led_wq; > > static int wait_read(void) > > { > > u8 status; > > - int us; > > - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > > + unsigned int us; > > + > > + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { > > udelay(us); > > status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > > /* read: wait for smc to settle */ > > if (status & 0x01) > > return 0; > > } > > + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ > > + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > > + mdelay(us); > > + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > > + /* read: wait for smc to settle */ > > + if (status & 0x01) > > + return 0; > > + } > > > > pr_warn("wait_read() fail: 0x%02x\n", status); > > return -EIO; > > @@ -177,10 +187,10 @@ static int wait_read(void) > > static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) > > { > > u8 status; > > - int us; > > + unsigned int us; > > > > outb(cmd, port); > > - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > > + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { > > udelay(us); > > status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > > /* write: wait for smc to settle */ > > @@ -190,6 +200,23 @@ static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) > > if (status & 0x04) > > return 0; > > /* timeout: give up */ > > + if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX) > > + break; > > + /* busy: long wait and resend */ > > + udelay(APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT); > > + outb(cmd, port); > > + } > > + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ > > + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > > + mdelay(us); > > + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > > + /* write: wait for smc to settle */ > > + if (status & 0x02) > > + continue; > > + /* ready: cmd accepted, return */ > > + if (status & 0x04) > > + return 0; > > + /* timeout: give up */ > > if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT) > > break; > > /* busy: long wait and resend */ > > -- > > 2.23.0.351.gc4317032e6-goog > > > > This resolves the __bad_udelay appearance at -O3 for me. I am not > familiar enough with this code to give a reviewed by though! Does that constitute a Tested-by tag? > > Also, for some odd reason, I couldn't apply your patch with 'git apply': > > % curl -LSs https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190924174728.201464-1-ndesaulniers@google.com/raw | git apply > error: corrupt patch at line 117 > > It looks like some of the '=' got changed into =3D and some spaces got > changed into =20. Weird encoding glitch? The text in my email client shows no encoding error; the link above shows the issue. Attaching a copy here, in case git-send-email related. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers From e112935cb4361aa820b89588e5764bfc3dfd7f9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:26:34 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (applesmc) fix UB and udelay overflow MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Fixes the following 2 issues in the driver: 1. Left shifting a signed integer is undefined behavior. Unsigned integral types should be used for bitwise operations. 2. The delay scales from 0x0010 to 0x20000 by powers of 2, but udelay will result in a linkage failure when given a constant that's greater than 20000 (0x4E20). Agressive loop unrolling can fully unroll the loop, resulting in later iterations overflowing the call to udelay. 2 is fixed via splitting the loop in two, iterating the first up to the point where udelay would overflow, then switching to mdelay, as suggested in Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst. Reported-by: Tomasz Paweł Gajc <tpgxyz@gmail.com> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/678 Debugged-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> --- Changes V1 -> V2: * The first loop in send_byte() needs to break out on the same condition now. Technically, the loop condition could even be removed. The diff looks funny because of the duplicated logic between existing and newly added for loops. drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c index 183ff3d25129..c76adb504dff 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ #define APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT 0x0010 #define APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT 0x0100 #define APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT 0x20000 +#define APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX 20000 #define APPLESMC_READ_CMD 0x10 #define APPLESMC_WRITE_CMD 0x11 @@ -157,14 +158,23 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *applesmc_led_wq; static int wait_read(void) { u8 status; - int us; - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { + unsigned int us; + + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { udelay(us); status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); /* read: wait for smc to settle */ if (status & 0x01) return 0; } + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { + mdelay(us); + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); + /* read: wait for smc to settle */ + if (status & 0x01) + return 0; + } pr_warn("wait_read() fail: 0x%02x\n", status); return -EIO; @@ -177,10 +187,10 @@ static int wait_read(void) static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) { u8 status; - int us; + unsigned int us; outb(cmd, port); - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { udelay(us); status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); /* write: wait for smc to settle */ @@ -190,6 +200,23 @@ static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) if (status & 0x04) return 0; /* timeout: give up */ + if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX) + break; + /* busy: long wait and resend */ + udelay(APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT); + outb(cmd, port); + } + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { + mdelay(us); + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); + /* write: wait for smc to settle */ + if (status & 0x02) + continue; + /* ready: cmd accepted, return */ + if (status & 0x04) + return 0; + /* timeout: give up */ if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT) break; /* busy: long wait and resend */
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:36:44PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:38 AM Nathan Chancellor > <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:47:28AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > Fixes the following 2 issues in the driver: > > > 1. Left shifting a signed integer is undefined behavior. Unsigned > > > integral types should be used for bitwise operations. > > > 2. The delay scales from 0x0010 to 0x20000 by powers of 2, but udelay > > > will result in a linkage failure when given a constant that's greater > > > than 20000 (0x4E20). Agressive loop unrolling can fully unroll the > > > loop, resulting in later iterations overflowing the call to udelay. > > > > > > 2 is fixed via splitting the loop in two, iterating the first up to the > > > point where udelay would overflow, then switching to mdelay, as > > > suggested in Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst. > > > > > > Reported-by: Tomasz Paweł Gajc <tpgxyz@gmail.com> > > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/678 > > > Debugged-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> > > > --- > > > Changes V1 -> V2: > > > * The first loop in send_byte() needs to break out on the same condition > > > now. Technically, the loop condition could even be removed. The diff > > > looks funny because of the duplicated logic between existing and newly > > > added for loops. > > > > > > drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > > > index 183ff3d25129..c76adb504dff 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ > > > #define APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT 0x0010 > > > #define APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT 0x0100 > > > #define APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT 0x20000 > > > +#define APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX 20000 > > > > > > #define APPLESMC_READ_CMD 0x10 > > > #define APPLESMC_WRITE_CMD 0x11 > > > @@ -157,14 +158,23 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *applesmc_led_wq; > > > static int wait_read(void) > > > { > > > u8 status; > > > - int us; > > > - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > > > + unsigned int us; > > > + > > > + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { > > > udelay(us); > > > status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > > > /* read: wait for smc to settle */ > > > if (status & 0x01) > > > return 0; > > > } > > > + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ > > > + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > > > + mdelay(us); > > > + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > > > + /* read: wait for smc to settle */ > > > + if (status & 0x01) > > > + return 0; > > > + } > > > > > > pr_warn("wait_read() fail: 0x%02x\n", status); > > > return -EIO; > > > @@ -177,10 +187,10 @@ static int wait_read(void) > > > static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) > > > { > > > u8 status; > > > - int us; > > > + unsigned int us; > > > > > > outb(cmd, port); > > > - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > > > + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { > > > udelay(us); > > > status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > > > /* write: wait for smc to settle */ > > > @@ -190,6 +200,23 @@ static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) > > > if (status & 0x04) > > > return 0; > > > /* timeout: give up */ > > > + if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX) > > > + break; > > > + /* busy: long wait and resend */ > > > + udelay(APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT); > > > + outb(cmd, port); > > > + } > > > + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ > > > + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > > > + mdelay(us); > > > + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > > > + /* write: wait for smc to settle */ > > > + if (status & 0x02) > > > + continue; > > > + /* ready: cmd accepted, return */ > > > + if (status & 0x04) > > > + return 0; > > > + /* timeout: give up */ > > > if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT) > > > break; > > > /* busy: long wait and resend */ > > > -- > > > 2.23.0.351.gc4317032e6-goog > > > > > > > This resolves the __bad_udelay appearance at -O3 for me. I am not > > familiar enough with this code to give a reviewed by though! > > Does that constitute a Tested-by tag? Given that this could have real implications for the hardware, I would think tested by would imply running this on said hardware. FWIW: Build-tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> > > > > Also, for some odd reason, I couldn't apply your patch with 'git apply': > > > > % curl -LSs https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190924174728.201464-1-ndesaulniers@google.com/raw | git apply > > error: corrupt patch at line 117 > > > > It looks like some of the '=' got changed into =3D and some spaces got > > changed into =20. Weird encoding glitch? > > The text in my email client shows no encoding error; the link above > shows the issue. Attaching a copy here, in case git-send-email > related. Yes, appears git send-email related because your attached patch applies just fine. Cheers, Nathan
I spent quite some time to rewrite applesmc but I couldn't finish. Thanks for the loop fix. I did my reviewing part, if that matters. > Reported-by: Tomasz Paweł Gajc <tpgxyz@gmail.com> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/678 > Debugged-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> > Build-tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cengiz Can <cengiz@kernel.wtf>
On 9/24/19 10:47 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > Fixes the following 2 issues in the driver: > 1. Left shifting a signed integer is undefined behavior. Unsigned > integral types should be used for bitwise operations. > 2. The delay scales from 0x0010 to 0x20000 by powers of 2, but udelay > will result in a linkage failure when given a constant that's greater > than 20000 (0x4E20). Agressive loop unrolling can fully unroll the > loop, resulting in later iterations overflowing the call to udelay. > > 2 is fixed via splitting the loop in two, iterating the first up to the > point where udelay would overflow, then switching to mdelay, as > suggested in Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst. > > Reported-by: Tomasz Paweł Gajc <tpgxyz@gmail.com> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/678 > Debugged-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> > --- > Changes V1 -> V2: > * The first loop in send_byte() needs to break out on the same condition > now. Technically, the loop condition could even be removed. The diff > looks funny because of the duplicated logic between existing and newly > added for loops. > That is a delay()-internal dependency, and completely undocumented. This code will fall apart if the implementation of udelay() is ever changed. This also depends on the architecture - in some cases, mdelay() is implemented as udelay(n * 1000). > drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > index 183ff3d25129..c76adb504dff 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ > #define APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT 0x0010 > #define APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT 0x0100 > #define APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT 0x20000 > +#define APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX 20000 > This is not really a problem in this driver; it is a system problem. Anyone can call udelay() with a parameter longer than 20,000 us. We can't add code like this all over the place because the implementation of delay() is broken. Besides, calling delay() with a parameter of 20,000 or more is a strong indication that something is really wrong with the code. More on that see below. > #define APPLESMC_READ_CMD 0x10 > #define APPLESMC_WRITE_CMD 0x11 > @@ -157,14 +158,23 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *applesmc_led_wq; > static int wait_read(void) > { > u8 status; > - int us; > - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > + unsigned int us; > + > + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { > udelay(us); > status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > /* read: wait for smc to settle */ > if (status & 0x01) > return 0; > } > + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ > + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > + mdelay(us); Shouldn't that be us / 1000 ? Seems to me the above will wait for at least 20000 ms, which is a a tiny bit long. Also, mdelay(n) is by default implemented as udelay(n * 1000). Also, at the very least, this should be something like if (us < limit) delay(us); else mdelay(us / 1000); instead of introducing a second loop. But more on that below. > + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > + /* read: wait for smc to settle */ > + if (status & 0x01) > + return 0; > + } > > pr_warn("wait_read() fail: 0x%02x\n", status); > return -EIO; > @@ -177,10 +187,10 @@ static int wait_read(void) > static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) > { > u8 status; > - int us; > + unsigned int us; > > outb(cmd, port); > - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { > udelay(us); > status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > /* write: wait for smc to settle */ > @@ -190,6 +200,23 @@ static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) > if (status & 0x04) > return 0; > /* timeout: give up */ > + if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX) > + break; > + /* busy: long wait and resend */ > + udelay(APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT); > + outb(cmd, port); > + } > + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ > + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { > + mdelay(us); Again, I fail to understand why waiting for a multiple of 20 seconds under any circumstances would make any sense. Maybe the idea was to divide us by 1000 before entering the second loop ? Looking into the code, there is no need to use udelay() in the first place. It should be possible to replace the longer waits with usleep_range(). Something like if (us < some_low_value) // eg. 0x80 delay(us) else usleep_range(us, us * 2); should do, and at the same time prevent the system from turning into a space heater. Thanks, Guenter > + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); > + /* write: wait for smc to settle */ > + if (status & 0x02) > + continue; > + /* ready: cmd accepted, return */ > + if (status & 0x04) > + return 0; > + /* timeout: give up */ > if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT) > break; > /* busy: long wait and resend */ >
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 5:01 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > Again, I fail to understand why waiting for a multiple of 20 seconds > under any circumstances would make any sense. Maybe the idea was > to divide us by 1000 before entering the second loop ? Yes, that's very clearly a mistake of mine. > > Looking into the code, there is no need to use udelay() in the first > place. It should be possible to replace the longer waits with > usleep_range(). Something like > > if (us < some_low_value) // eg. 0x80 > delay(us) Did you mean udelay here? > else > usleep_range(us, us * 2); > > should do, and at the same time prevent the system from turning > into a space heater. The issue would persist with the above if udelay remains in a loop that gets fully unrolled. That's while I "peel" the loop into two loops over different ranges with different bodies. I think I should iterate in the first loop until the number of `us` is greater than 1000 (us per ms)(which is less of a magical constant and doesn't expose internal implementation details of udelay), then start the second loop (dividing us by 1000). What do you think, Guenter? -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
On 10/2/19 2:43 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 5:01 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: >> >> Again, I fail to understand why waiting for a multiple of 20 seconds >> under any circumstances would make any sense. Maybe the idea was >> to divide us by 1000 before entering the second loop ? > > Yes, that's very clearly a mistake of mine. > >> >> Looking into the code, there is no need to use udelay() in the first >> place. It should be possible to replace the longer waits with >> usleep_range(). Something like >> >> if (us < some_low_value) // eg. 0x80 >> delay(us) > > Did you mean udelay here? > Yes >> else >> usleep_range(us, us * 2); >> >> should do, and at the same time prevent the system from turning >> into a space heater. > > The issue would persist with the above if udelay remains in a loop > that gets fully unrolled. That's while I "peel" the loop into two > loops over different ranges with different bodies. > Sorry, you lost me. If calls to udelay() with even small delay parameters for some compiler-related reason no longer work, trying to fix the problem with some odd driver code is most definitely not a real solution. > I think I should iterate in the first loop until the number of `us` is > greater than 1000 (us per ms)(which is less of a magical constant and > doesn't expose internal implementation details of udelay), then start > the second loop (dividing us by 1000). What do you think, Guenter? > We should have no second loop, period. Again, a hot delay loop of 128 ms (actually, more like 245 ms, adding all delays together) is clearly wrong. Those udelay() calls in the driver should really be replaced with usleep_range(). Guenter
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c index 183ff3d25129..c76adb504dff 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ #define APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT 0x0010 #define APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT 0x0100 #define APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT 0x20000 +#define APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX 20000 #define APPLESMC_READ_CMD 0x10 #define APPLESMC_WRITE_CMD 0x11 @@ -157,14 +158,23 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *applesmc_led_wq; static int wait_read(void) { u8 status; - int us; - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { + unsigned int us; + + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { udelay(us); status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); /* read: wait for smc to settle */ if (status & 0x01) return 0; } + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { + mdelay(us); + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); + /* read: wait for smc to settle */ + if (status & 0x01) + return 0; + } pr_warn("wait_read() fail: 0x%02x\n", status); return -EIO; @@ -177,10 +187,10 @@ static int wait_read(void) static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) { u8 status; - int us; + unsigned int us; outb(cmd, port); - for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { + for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) { udelay(us); status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); /* write: wait for smc to settle */ @@ -190,6 +200,23 @@ static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port) if (status & 0x04) return 0; /* timeout: give up */ + if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX) + break; + /* busy: long wait and resend */ + udelay(APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT); + outb(cmd, port); + } + /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */ + for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) { + mdelay(us); + status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT); + /* write: wait for smc to settle */ + if (status & 0x02) + continue; + /* ready: cmd accepted, return */ + if (status & 0x04) + return 0; + /* timeout: give up */ if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT) break; /* busy: long wait and resend */
Fixes the following 2 issues in the driver: 1. Left shifting a signed integer is undefined behavior. Unsigned integral types should be used for bitwise operations. 2. The delay scales from 0x0010 to 0x20000 by powers of 2, but udelay will result in a linkage failure when given a constant that's greater than 20000 (0x4E20). Agressive loop unrolling can fully unroll the loop, resulting in later iterations overflowing the call to udelay. 2 is fixed via splitting the loop in two, iterating the first up to the point where udelay would overflow, then switching to mdelay, as suggested in Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst. Reported-by: Tomasz Paweł Gajc <tpgxyz@gmail.com> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/678 Debugged-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> --- Changes V1 -> V2: * The first loop in send_byte() needs to break out on the same condition now. Technically, the loop condition could even be removed. The diff looks funny because of the duplicated logic between existing and newly added for loops. drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.23.0.351.gc4317032e6-goog