| Message ID | 20200921174320.46062-5-thuth@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Do not support Debian 9 and Python 3.5 anymore | expand |
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 07:43:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > We're not supporting Debian 9 anymore, and we are now testing > MinGW cross-compiler builds in the gitlab-CI, too, so we do not > really need these jobs in the shippable.yml anymore. For that matter aren't all the other shippable entries obsolete now too since we added .gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml ? IOW, can we remove shippable entirely at this point ? > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > --- > .shippable.yml | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/.shippable.yml b/.shippable.yml > index 0b4fd6df1d..14350e6de8 100644 > --- a/.shippable.yml > +++ b/.shippable.yml > @@ -7,10 +7,6 @@ env: > matrix: > - IMAGE=debian-amd64 > TARGET_LIST=x86_64-softmmu,x86_64-linux-user > - - IMAGE=debian-win32-cross > - TARGET_LIST=arm-softmmu,i386-softmmu > - - IMAGE=debian-win64-cross > - TARGET_LIST=aarch64-softmmu,sparc64-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu > - IMAGE=debian-armel-cross > TARGET_LIST=arm-softmmu,arm-linux-user,armeb-linux-user > - IMAGE=debian-armhf-cross > -- > 2.18.2 > Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
On 21/09/2020 20.07, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 07:43:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: >> We're not supporting Debian 9 anymore, and we are now testing >> MinGW cross-compiler builds in the gitlab-CI, too, so we do not >> really need these jobs in the shippable.yml anymore. > > For that matter aren't all the other shippable entries obsolete > now too since we added .gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml ? Yes, they are covered by the gitlab-ci now, too. > IOW, can we remove shippable entirely at this point ? We likely could ... but I recently had a very quick chat with Alex in IRC, and we agreed to keep them for a while until it's clearer whether we can continue with unlimited CI minutes in gitlab or not. Thomas
On 9/21/20 8:10 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 21/09/2020 20.07, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 07:43:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> We're not supporting Debian 9 anymore, and we are now testing >>> MinGW cross-compiler builds in the gitlab-CI, too, so we do not >>> really need these jobs in the shippable.yml anymore. >> >> For that matter aren't all the other shippable entries obsolete >> now too since we added .gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds.yml ? > > Yes, they are covered by the gitlab-ci now, too. > >> IOW, can we remove shippable entirely at this point ? > > We likely could ... but I recently had a very quick chat with Alex in > IRC, and we agreed to keep them for a while until it's clearer whether > we can continue with unlimited CI minutes in gitlab or not. As an intermediate step we can pull the docker images from GitLab. > > Thomas >
diff --git a/.shippable.yml b/.shippable.yml index 0b4fd6df1d..14350e6de8 100644 --- a/.shippable.yml +++ b/.shippable.yml @@ -7,10 +7,6 @@ env: matrix: - IMAGE=debian-amd64 TARGET_LIST=x86_64-softmmu,x86_64-linux-user - - IMAGE=debian-win32-cross - TARGET_LIST=arm-softmmu,i386-softmmu - - IMAGE=debian-win64-cross - TARGET_LIST=aarch64-softmmu,sparc64-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu - IMAGE=debian-armel-cross TARGET_LIST=arm-softmmu,arm-linux-user,armeb-linux-user - IMAGE=debian-armhf-cross
We're not supporting Debian 9 anymore, and we are now testing MinGW cross-compiler builds in the gitlab-CI, too, so we do not really need these jobs in the shippable.yml anymore. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> --- .shippable.yml | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)