Message ID | 20210218160745.2343501-1-Jason@zx2c4.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [net,v2] net: icmp: pass zeroed opts from icmp{,v6}_ndo_send before sending | expand |
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:08 AM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote: > > The icmp{,v6}_send functions make all sorts of use of skb->cb, casting > it with IPCB or IP6CB, assuming the skb to have come directly from the > inet layer. But when the packet comes from the ndo layer, especially > when forwarded, there's no telling what might be in skb->cb at that > point. As a result, the icmp sending code risks reading bogus memory > contents, which can result in nasty stack overflows such as this one > reported by a user: > > panic+0x108/0x2ea > __stack_chk_fail+0x14/0x20 > __icmp_send+0x5bd/0x5c0 > icmp_ndo_send+0x148/0x160 > > This is easy to simulate by doing a `memset(skb->cb, 0x41, > sizeof(skb->cb));` before calling icmp{,v6}_ndo_send, and it's only by > good fortune and the rarity of icmp sending from that context that we've > avoided reports like this until now. For example, in KASAN: > > BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __ip_options_echo+0xa0e/0x12b0 > Write of size 38 at addr ffff888006f1f80e by task ping/89 > CPU: 2 PID: 89 Comm: ping Not tainted 5.10.0-rc7-debug+ #5 > Call Trace: > dump_stack+0x9a/0xcc > print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1a/0x160 > __kasan_report.cold+0x20/0x38 > kasan_report+0x32/0x40 > check_memory_region+0x145/0x1a0 > memcpy+0x39/0x60 > __ip_options_echo+0xa0e/0x12b0 > __icmp_send+0x744/0x1700 > > Actually, out of the 4 drivers that do this, only gtp zeroed the cb for > the v4 case, while the rest did not. So this commit actually removes the > gtp-specific zeroing, while putting the code where it belongs in the > shared infrastructure of icmp{,v6}_ndo_send. > > This commit fixes the issue by passing an empty IPCB or IP6CB along to > the functions that actually do the work. For the icmp_send, this was > already trivial, thanks to __icmp_send providing the plumbing function. > For icmpv6_send, this required a tiny bit of refactoring to make it > behave like the v4 case, after which it was straight forward. > > Fixes: a2b78e9b2cac ("sunvnet: generate ICMP PTMUD messages for smaller port MTUs") > Reported-by: SinYu <liuxyon@gmail.com> > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAF=yD-LOF116aHub6RMe8vB8ZpnrrnoTdqhobEx+bvoA8AsP0w@mail.gmail.com/T/ > Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> Thanks for respinning. Making ipv4 and ipv6 more aligned is a good goal, but more for net-next than bug fixes that need to be backported to many stable branches. Beyond that, I'm not sure this fixes additional cases vs the previous patch? It uses new on-stack variables instead of skb->cb, which again is probably good in general, but adds more change than is needed for the stable fix. My comment on fixing all callers of icmp{,v6}_send was wrong, in hindsight. In most cases IPCB is set correctly before calling those, so we cannot just zero inside those. If we can only address the case for icmp{,v6}_ndo_send I think the previous patch introduced less churn, so is preferable. Unless I'm missing something. Reminder of two main comments: sufficient to zero sizeof(IPCB..) and if respinning, please explicitly mention the path that leads to a stack overflow, as it is not immediately obvious (even from reading the fix code?). > --- > drivers/net/gtp.c | 1 - > include/linux/icmpv6.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------ > include/linux/ipv6.h | 1 - > include/net/icmp.h | 6 +++++- > net/ipv4/icmp.c | 5 +++-- > net/ipv6/icmp.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > net/ipv6/ip6_icmp.c | 7 ++++--- > 7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/gtp.c b/drivers/net/gtp.c > index 4c04e271f184..fd3c2d86e48b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/gtp.c > +++ b/drivers/net/gtp.c > @@ -539,7 +539,6 @@ static int gtp_build_skb_ip4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, > if (!skb_is_gso(skb) && (iph->frag_off & htons(IP_DF)) && > mtu < ntohs(iph->tot_len)) { > netdev_dbg(dev, "packet too big, fragmentation needed\n"); > - memset(IPCB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IPCB(skb))); > icmp_ndo_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED, > htonl(mtu)); > goto err_rt; > diff --git a/include/linux/icmpv6.h b/include/linux/icmpv6.h > index 1b3371ae8193..0a383202dd5e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/icmpv6.h > +++ b/include/linux/icmpv6.h > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > #define _LINUX_ICMPV6_H > > #include <linux/skbuff.h> > +#include <linux/ipv6.h> > #include <uapi/linux/icmpv6.h> > > static inline struct icmp6hdr *icmp6_hdr(const struct sk_buff *skb) > @@ -15,13 +16,16 @@ static inline struct icmp6hdr *icmp6_hdr(const struct sk_buff *skb) > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) > > typedef void ip6_icmp_send_t(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, > - const struct in6_addr *force_saddr); > + const struct in6_addr *force_saddr, > + const struct inet6_skb_parm *parm); > #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_IPV6) > void icmp6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, > - const struct in6_addr *force_saddr); > -static inline void icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) > + const struct in6_addr *force_saddr, > + const struct inet6_skb_parm *parm); > +static inline void __icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, > + const struct inet6_skb_parm *parm) > { > - icmp6_send(skb, type, code, info, NULL); > + icmp6_send(skb, type, code, info, NULL, parm); > } > static inline int inet6_register_icmp_sender(ip6_icmp_send_t *fn) > { > @@ -34,18 +38,28 @@ static inline int inet6_unregister_icmp_sender(ip6_icmp_send_t *fn) > return 0; > } > #else > -extern void icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info); > +extern void __icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, > + const struct inet6_skb_parm *parm); > extern int inet6_register_icmp_sender(ip6_icmp_send_t *fn); > extern int inet6_unregister_icmp_sender(ip6_icmp_send_t *fn); > #endif > > +static inline void icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) > +{ > + __icmpv6_send(skb, type, code, info, IP6CB(skb)); > +} > + > int ip6_err_gen_icmpv6_unreach(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhs, int type, > unsigned int data_len); > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) > void icmpv6_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info); > #else > -#define icmpv6_ndo_send icmpv6_send > +static inline void icmpv6_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) > +{ > + struct inet6_skb_parm parm = { 0 }; > + __icmpv6_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &parm); > +} > #endif > > #else > diff --git a/include/linux/ipv6.h b/include/linux/ipv6.h > index dda61d150a13..f514a7dd8c9c 100644 > --- a/include/linux/ipv6.h > +++ b/include/linux/ipv6.h > @@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ struct ipv6_params { > __s32 autoconf; > }; > extern struct ipv6_params ipv6_defaults; > -#include <linux/icmpv6.h> > #include <linux/tcp.h> > #include <linux/udp.h> > > diff --git a/include/net/icmp.h b/include/net/icmp.h > index 9ac2d2672a93..fd84adc47963 100644 > --- a/include/net/icmp.h > +++ b/include/net/icmp.h > @@ -46,7 +46,11 @@ static inline void icmp_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) > void icmp_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 info); > #else > -#define icmp_ndo_send icmp_send > +static inline void icmp_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 info) > +{ > + struct ip_options opts = { 0 }; > + __icmp_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &opts); > +} > #endif > > int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb); > diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c > index 396b492c804f..616e2dc1c8fa 100644 > --- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c > +++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c > @@ -775,13 +775,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__icmp_send); > void icmp_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 info) > { > struct sk_buff *cloned_skb = NULL; > + struct ip_options opts = { 0 }; > enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo; > struct nf_conn *ct; > __be32 orig_ip; > > ct = nf_ct_get(skb_in, &ctinfo); > if (!ct || !(ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT)) { > - icmp_send(skb_in, type, code, info); > + __icmp_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &opts); > return; > } > > @@ -796,7 +797,7 @@ void icmp_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 info) > > orig_ip = ip_hdr(skb_in)->saddr; > ip_hdr(skb_in)->saddr = ct->tuplehash[0].tuple.src.u3.ip; > - icmp_send(skb_in, type, code, info); > + __icmp_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &opts); > ip_hdr(skb_in)->saddr = orig_ip; > out: > consume_skb(cloned_skb); > diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c > index f3d05866692e..fd1f896115c1 100644 > --- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c > +++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c > @@ -331,10 +331,9 @@ static int icmpv6_getfrag(void *from, char *to, int offset, int len, int odd, st > } > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6) > -static void mip6_addr_swap(struct sk_buff *skb) > +static void mip6_addr_swap(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct inet6_skb_parm *opt) > { > struct ipv6hdr *iph = ipv6_hdr(skb); > - struct inet6_skb_parm *opt = IP6CB(skb); > struct ipv6_destopt_hao *hao; > struct in6_addr tmp; > int off; > @@ -351,7 +350,7 @@ static void mip6_addr_swap(struct sk_buff *skb) > } > } > #else > -static inline void mip6_addr_swap(struct sk_buff *skb) {} > +static inline void mip6_addr_swap(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct inet6_skb_parm *opt) {} > #endif > > static struct dst_entry *icmpv6_route_lookup(struct net *net, > @@ -446,7 +445,8 @@ static int icmp6_iif(const struct sk_buff *skb) > * Send an ICMP message in response to a packet in error > */ > void icmp6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, > - const struct in6_addr *force_saddr) > + const struct in6_addr *force_saddr, > + const struct inet6_skb_parm *parm) > { > struct inet6_dev *idev = NULL; > struct ipv6hdr *hdr = ipv6_hdr(skb); > @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ void icmp6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, > if (!(skb->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) && !icmpv6_global_allow(net, type)) > goto out_bh_enable; > > - mip6_addr_swap(skb); > + mip6_addr_swap(skb, parm); > > sk = icmpv6_xmit_lock(net); > if (!sk) > @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ void icmp6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, > /* select a more meaningful saddr from input if */ > struct net_device *in_netdev; > > - in_netdev = dev_get_by_index(net, IP6CB(skb)->iif); > + in_netdev = dev_get_by_index(net, parm->iif); > if (in_netdev) { > ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, in_netdev, &fl6.daddr, > inet6_sk(sk)->srcprefs, > @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(icmp6_send); > */ > void icmpv6_param_prob(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 code, int pos) > { > - icmp6_send(skb, ICMPV6_PARAMPROB, code, pos, NULL); > + icmp6_send(skb, ICMPV6_PARAMPROB, code, pos, NULL, IP6CB(skb)); > kfree_skb(skb); > } > > @@ -697,10 +697,10 @@ int ip6_err_gen_icmpv6_unreach(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhs, int type, > } > if (type == ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED) > icmp6_send(skb2, ICMPV6_TIME_EXCEED, ICMPV6_EXC_HOPLIMIT, > - info, &temp_saddr); > + info, &temp_saddr, IP6CB(skb2)); > else > icmp6_send(skb2, ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH, ICMPV6_ADDR_UNREACH, > - info, &temp_saddr); > + info, &temp_saddr, IP6CB(skb2)); > if (rt) > ip6_rt_put(rt); > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_icmp.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_icmp.c > index 70c8c2f36c98..5f834ebc09b0 100644 > --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_icmp.c > +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_icmp.c > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ void icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) > rcu_read_lock(); > send = rcu_dereference(ip6_icmp_send); > if (send) > - send(skb, type, code, info, NULL); > + send(skb, type, code, info, NULL, IP6CB(skb)); > rcu_read_unlock(); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(icmpv6_send); > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(icmpv6_send); > #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h> > void icmpv6_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) > { > + struct inet6_skb_parm parm = { 0 }; > struct sk_buff *cloned_skb = NULL; > enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo; > struct in6_addr orig_ip; > @@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ void icmpv6_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) > > ct = nf_ct_get(skb_in, &ctinfo); > if (!ct || !(ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT)) { > - icmpv6_send(skb_in, type, code, info); > + __icmpv6_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &parm); > return; > } > > @@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ void icmpv6_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) > > orig_ip = ipv6_hdr(skb_in)->saddr; > ipv6_hdr(skb_in)->saddr = ct->tuplehash[0].tuple.src.u3.in6; > - icmpv6_send(skb_in, type, code, info); > + __icmpv6_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &parm); > ipv6_hdr(skb_in)->saddr = orig_ip; > out: > consume_skb(cloned_skb); > -- > 2.30.1 >
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:34 PM Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for respinning. > > Making ipv4 and ipv6 more aligned is a good goal, but more for > net-next than bug fixes that need to be backported to many stable > branches. > > Beyond that, I'm not sure this fixes additional cases vs the previous > patch? It uses new on-stack variables instead of skb->cb, which again > is probably good in general, but adds more change than is needed for > the stable fix. It doesn't appear to be problematic for applying to stable. I think this v2 is the "right way" to handle it. Zeroing out skb->cb is unexpected and weird anyway. What if the caller was expecting to use their skb->cb after calling icmp_ndo_send? Did they think it'd get wiped out like that? This v2 prevents that weird behavior from happening. > My comment on fixing all callers of icmp{,v6}_send was wrong, in > hindsight. In most cases IPCB is set correctly before calling those, > so we cannot just zero inside those. If we can only address the case > for icmp{,v6}_ndo_send I think the previous patch introduced less > churn, so is preferable. Unless I'm missing something. As mentioned above it's weird and unexpected. > Reminder of two main comments: sufficient to zero sizeof(IPCB..) and > if respinning, please explicitly mention the path that leads to a > stack overflow, as it is not immediately obvious (even from reading > the fix code?). I don't intend to respin v1, as I think v2 is more correct, and I don't think only zeroing IPCB is a smart idea, as in the future that code is bound to break when somebody forgets to update it. This v2 does away with the zeroing all together, though, so that the right bytes to be zeroed are properly enforced all the time by the type system. Jason
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:58 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:34 PM Willem de Bruijn > <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for respinning. > > > > Making ipv4 and ipv6 more aligned is a good goal, but more for > > net-next than bug fixes that need to be backported to many stable > > branches. > > > > Beyond that, I'm not sure this fixes additional cases vs the previous > > patch? It uses new on-stack variables instead of skb->cb, which again > > is probably good in general, but adds more change than is needed for > > the stable fix. > > It doesn't appear to be problematic for applying to stable. I think > this v2 is the "right way" to handle it. Zeroing out skb->cb is > unexpected and weird anyway. What if the caller was expecting to use > their skb->cb after calling icmp_ndo_send? Did they think it'd get > wiped out like that? This v2 prevents that weird behavior from > happening. > > > My comment on fixing all callers of icmp{,v6}_send was wrong, in > > hindsight. In most cases IPCB is set correctly before calling those, > > so we cannot just zero inside those. If we can only address the case > > for icmp{,v6}_ndo_send I think the previous patch introduced less > > churn, so is preferable. Unless I'm missing something. > > As mentioned above it's weird and unexpected. > > > Reminder of two main comments: sufficient to zero sizeof(IPCB..) and > > if respinning, please explicitly mention the path that leads to a > > stack overflow, as it is not immediately obvious (even from reading > > the fix code?). > > I don't intend to respin v1, as I think v2 is more correct, and I > don't think only zeroing IPCB is a smart idea, as in the future that > code is bound to break when somebody forgets to update it. This v2 > does away with the zeroing all together, though, so that the right > bytes to be zeroed are properly enforced all the time by the type > system. I'm afraid this latest version seems to have build issues, as per the patchwork bot.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:16 PM Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:58 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:34 PM Willem de Bruijn > > <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for respinning. > > > > > > Making ipv4 and ipv6 more aligned is a good goal, but more for > > > net-next than bug fixes that need to be backported to many stable > > > branches. > > > > > > Beyond that, I'm not sure this fixes additional cases vs the previous > > > patch? It uses new on-stack variables instead of skb->cb, which again > > > is probably good in general, but adds more change than is needed for > > > the stable fix. > > > > It doesn't appear to be problematic for applying to stable. I think > > this v2 is the "right way" to handle it. Zeroing out skb->cb is > > unexpected and weird anyway. What if the caller was expecting to use > > their skb->cb after calling icmp_ndo_send? Did they think it'd get > > wiped out like that? This v2 prevents that weird behavior from > > happening. > > > > > My comment on fixing all callers of icmp{,v6}_send was wrong, in > > > hindsight. In most cases IPCB is set correctly before calling those, > > > so we cannot just zero inside those. If we can only address the case > > > for icmp{,v6}_ndo_send I think the previous patch introduced less > > > churn, so is preferable. Unless I'm missing something. > > > > As mentioned above it's weird and unexpected. > > > > > Reminder of two main comments: sufficient to zero sizeof(IPCB..) and > > > if respinning, please explicitly mention the path that leads to a > > > stack overflow, as it is not immediately obvious (even from reading > > > the fix code?). > > > > I don't intend to respin v1, as I think v2 is more correct, and I > > don't think only zeroing IPCB is a smart idea, as in the future that > > code is bound to break when somebody forgets to update it. This v2 > > does away with the zeroing all together, though, so that the right > > bytes to be zeroed are properly enforced all the time by the type > > system. > > I'm afraid this latest version seems to have build issues, as per the > patchwork bot. Hmm I didn't get those bot emails. Either way, I'll do a bit of build testing with different config knobs now and send a v3. Thanks for letting me know. Jason
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 3:25 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:16 PM Willem de Bruijn > <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:58 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:34 PM Willem de Bruijn > > > <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks for respinning. > > > > > > > > Making ipv4 and ipv6 more aligned is a good goal, but more for > > > > net-next than bug fixes that need to be backported to many stable > > > > branches. > > > > > > > > Beyond that, I'm not sure this fixes additional cases vs the previous > > > > patch? It uses new on-stack variables instead of skb->cb, which again > > > > is probably good in general, but adds more change than is needed for > > > > the stable fix. > > > > > > It doesn't appear to be problematic for applying to stable. I think > > > this v2 is the "right way" to handle it. Zeroing out skb->cb is > > > unexpected and weird anyway. What if the caller was expecting to use > > > their skb->cb after calling icmp_ndo_send? Did they think it'd get > > > wiped out like that? This v2 prevents that weird behavior from > > > happening. > > > > > > > My comment on fixing all callers of icmp{,v6}_send was wrong, in > > > > hindsight. In most cases IPCB is set correctly before calling those, > > > > so we cannot just zero inside those. If we can only address the case > > > > for icmp{,v6}_ndo_send I think the previous patch introduced less > > > > churn, so is preferable. Unless I'm missing something. > > > > > > As mentioned above it's weird and unexpected. > > > > > > > Reminder of two main comments: sufficient to zero sizeof(IPCB..) and > > > > if respinning, please explicitly mention the path that leads to a > > > > stack overflow, as it is not immediately obvious (even from reading > > > > the fix code?). > > > > > > I don't intend to respin v1, as I think v2 is more correct, and I > > > don't think only zeroing IPCB is a smart idea, as in the future that > > > code is bound to break when somebody forgets to update it. This v2 > > > does away with the zeroing all together, though, so that the right > > > bytes to be zeroed are properly enforced all the time by the type > > > system. > > > > I'm afraid this latest version seems to have build issues, as per the > > patchwork bot. > > Hmm I didn't get those bot emails. Either way, I'll do a bit of build > testing with different config knobs now and send a v3. Thanks for > letting me know. Different bot :) You might get emails from the other later. These can be found through patchwork at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210218160745.2343501-1-Jason@zx2c4.com/
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:37 PM Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 3:25 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:16 PM Willem de Bruijn > > <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:58 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:34 PM Willem de Bruijn > > > > <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for respinning. > > > > > > > > > > Making ipv4 and ipv6 more aligned is a good goal, but more for > > > > > net-next than bug fixes that need to be backported to many stable > > > > > branches. > > > > > > > > > > Beyond that, I'm not sure this fixes additional cases vs the previous > > > > > patch? It uses new on-stack variables instead of skb->cb, which again > > > > > is probably good in general, but adds more change than is needed for > > > > > the stable fix. > > > > > > > > It doesn't appear to be problematic for applying to stable. I think > > > > this v2 is the "right way" to handle it. Zeroing out skb->cb is > > > > unexpected and weird anyway. What if the caller was expecting to use > > > > their skb->cb after calling icmp_ndo_send? Did they think it'd get > > > > wiped out like that? This v2 prevents that weird behavior from > > > > happening. > > > > > > > > > My comment on fixing all callers of icmp{,v6}_send was wrong, in > > > > > hindsight. In most cases IPCB is set correctly before calling those, > > > > > so we cannot just zero inside those. If we can only address the case > > > > > for icmp{,v6}_ndo_send I think the previous patch introduced less > > > > > churn, so is preferable. Unless I'm missing something. > > > > > > > > As mentioned above it's weird and unexpected. > > > > > > > > > Reminder of two main comments: sufficient to zero sizeof(IPCB..) and > > > > > if respinning, please explicitly mention the path that leads to a > > > > > stack overflow, as it is not immediately obvious (even from reading > > > > > the fix code?). > > > > > > > > I don't intend to respin v1, as I think v2 is more correct, and I > > > > don't think only zeroing IPCB is a smart idea, as in the future that > > > > code is bound to break when somebody forgets to update it. This v2 > > > > does away with the zeroing all together, though, so that the right > > > > bytes to be zeroed are properly enforced all the time by the type > > > > system. > > > > > > I'm afraid this latest version seems to have build issues, as per the > > > patchwork bot. > > > > Hmm I didn't get those bot emails. Either way, I'll do a bit of build > > testing with different config knobs now and send a v3. Thanks for > > letting me know. > > Different bot :) > > You might get emails from the other later. These can be found through > patchwork at > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210218160745.2343501-1-Jason@zx2c4.com/ Wow, that is an awesome bot! Can't believe I hadn't seen that. v3 is posted at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210218203404.2429186-1-Jason@zx2c4.com/ and I guess now we're waiting for the bots to get whirling on it. Jason
diff --git a/drivers/net/gtp.c b/drivers/net/gtp.c index 4c04e271f184..fd3c2d86e48b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/gtp.c +++ b/drivers/net/gtp.c @@ -539,7 +539,6 @@ static int gtp_build_skb_ip4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, if (!skb_is_gso(skb) && (iph->frag_off & htons(IP_DF)) && mtu < ntohs(iph->tot_len)) { netdev_dbg(dev, "packet too big, fragmentation needed\n"); - memset(IPCB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IPCB(skb))); icmp_ndo_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED, htonl(mtu)); goto err_rt; diff --git a/include/linux/icmpv6.h b/include/linux/icmpv6.h index 1b3371ae8193..0a383202dd5e 100644 --- a/include/linux/icmpv6.h +++ b/include/linux/icmpv6.h @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ #define _LINUX_ICMPV6_H #include <linux/skbuff.h> +#include <linux/ipv6.h> #include <uapi/linux/icmpv6.h> static inline struct icmp6hdr *icmp6_hdr(const struct sk_buff *skb) @@ -15,13 +16,16 @@ static inline struct icmp6hdr *icmp6_hdr(const struct sk_buff *skb) #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) typedef void ip6_icmp_send_t(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, - const struct in6_addr *force_saddr); + const struct in6_addr *force_saddr, + const struct inet6_skb_parm *parm); #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_IPV6) void icmp6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, - const struct in6_addr *force_saddr); -static inline void icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) + const struct in6_addr *force_saddr, + const struct inet6_skb_parm *parm); +static inline void __icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, + const struct inet6_skb_parm *parm) { - icmp6_send(skb, type, code, info, NULL); + icmp6_send(skb, type, code, info, NULL, parm); } static inline int inet6_register_icmp_sender(ip6_icmp_send_t *fn) { @@ -34,18 +38,28 @@ static inline int inet6_unregister_icmp_sender(ip6_icmp_send_t *fn) return 0; } #else -extern void icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info); +extern void __icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, + const struct inet6_skb_parm *parm); extern int inet6_register_icmp_sender(ip6_icmp_send_t *fn); extern int inet6_unregister_icmp_sender(ip6_icmp_send_t *fn); #endif +static inline void icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) +{ + __icmpv6_send(skb, type, code, info, IP6CB(skb)); +} + int ip6_err_gen_icmpv6_unreach(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhs, int type, unsigned int data_len); #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) void icmpv6_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info); #else -#define icmpv6_ndo_send icmpv6_send +static inline void icmpv6_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) +{ + struct inet6_skb_parm parm = { 0 }; + __icmpv6_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &parm); +} #endif #else diff --git a/include/linux/ipv6.h b/include/linux/ipv6.h index dda61d150a13..f514a7dd8c9c 100644 --- a/include/linux/ipv6.h +++ b/include/linux/ipv6.h @@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ struct ipv6_params { __s32 autoconf; }; extern struct ipv6_params ipv6_defaults; -#include <linux/icmpv6.h> #include <linux/tcp.h> #include <linux/udp.h> diff --git a/include/net/icmp.h b/include/net/icmp.h index 9ac2d2672a93..fd84adc47963 100644 --- a/include/net/icmp.h +++ b/include/net/icmp.h @@ -46,7 +46,11 @@ static inline void icmp_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) void icmp_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 info); #else -#define icmp_ndo_send icmp_send +static inline void icmp_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 info) +{ + struct ip_options opts = { 0 }; + __icmp_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &opts); +} #endif int icmp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb); diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c index 396b492c804f..616e2dc1c8fa 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c @@ -775,13 +775,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__icmp_send); void icmp_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 info) { struct sk_buff *cloned_skb = NULL; + struct ip_options opts = { 0 }; enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo; struct nf_conn *ct; __be32 orig_ip; ct = nf_ct_get(skb_in, &ctinfo); if (!ct || !(ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT)) { - icmp_send(skb_in, type, code, info); + __icmp_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &opts); return; } @@ -796,7 +797,7 @@ void icmp_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 info) orig_ip = ip_hdr(skb_in)->saddr; ip_hdr(skb_in)->saddr = ct->tuplehash[0].tuple.src.u3.ip; - icmp_send(skb_in, type, code, info); + __icmp_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &opts); ip_hdr(skb_in)->saddr = orig_ip; out: consume_skb(cloned_skb); diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c index f3d05866692e..fd1f896115c1 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c +++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c @@ -331,10 +331,9 @@ static int icmpv6_getfrag(void *from, char *to, int offset, int len, int odd, st } #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6) -static void mip6_addr_swap(struct sk_buff *skb) +static void mip6_addr_swap(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct inet6_skb_parm *opt) { struct ipv6hdr *iph = ipv6_hdr(skb); - struct inet6_skb_parm *opt = IP6CB(skb); struct ipv6_destopt_hao *hao; struct in6_addr tmp; int off; @@ -351,7 +350,7 @@ static void mip6_addr_swap(struct sk_buff *skb) } } #else -static inline void mip6_addr_swap(struct sk_buff *skb) {} +static inline void mip6_addr_swap(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct inet6_skb_parm *opt) {} #endif static struct dst_entry *icmpv6_route_lookup(struct net *net, @@ -446,7 +445,8 @@ static int icmp6_iif(const struct sk_buff *skb) * Send an ICMP message in response to a packet in error */ void icmp6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, - const struct in6_addr *force_saddr) + const struct in6_addr *force_saddr, + const struct inet6_skb_parm *parm) { struct inet6_dev *idev = NULL; struct ipv6hdr *hdr = ipv6_hdr(skb); @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ void icmp6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, if (!(skb->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) && !icmpv6_global_allow(net, type)) goto out_bh_enable; - mip6_addr_swap(skb); + mip6_addr_swap(skb, parm); sk = icmpv6_xmit_lock(net); if (!sk) @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ void icmp6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, /* select a more meaningful saddr from input if */ struct net_device *in_netdev; - in_netdev = dev_get_by_index(net, IP6CB(skb)->iif); + in_netdev = dev_get_by_index(net, parm->iif); if (in_netdev) { ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, in_netdev, &fl6.daddr, inet6_sk(sk)->srcprefs, @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(icmp6_send); */ void icmpv6_param_prob(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 code, int pos) { - icmp6_send(skb, ICMPV6_PARAMPROB, code, pos, NULL); + icmp6_send(skb, ICMPV6_PARAMPROB, code, pos, NULL, IP6CB(skb)); kfree_skb(skb); } @@ -697,10 +697,10 @@ int ip6_err_gen_icmpv6_unreach(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhs, int type, } if (type == ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED) icmp6_send(skb2, ICMPV6_TIME_EXCEED, ICMPV6_EXC_HOPLIMIT, - info, &temp_saddr); + info, &temp_saddr, IP6CB(skb2)); else icmp6_send(skb2, ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH, ICMPV6_ADDR_UNREACH, - info, &temp_saddr); + info, &temp_saddr, IP6CB(skb2)); if (rt) ip6_rt_put(rt); diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_icmp.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_icmp.c index 70c8c2f36c98..5f834ebc09b0 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_icmp.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_icmp.c @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ void icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) rcu_read_lock(); send = rcu_dereference(ip6_icmp_send); if (send) - send(skb, type, code, info, NULL); + send(skb, type, code, info, NULL, IP6CB(skb)); rcu_read_unlock(); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(icmpv6_send); @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(icmpv6_send); #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h> void icmpv6_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) { + struct inet6_skb_parm parm = { 0 }; struct sk_buff *cloned_skb = NULL; enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo; struct in6_addr orig_ip; @@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ void icmpv6_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) ct = nf_ct_get(skb_in, &ctinfo); if (!ct || !(ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT)) { - icmpv6_send(skb_in, type, code, info); + __icmpv6_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &parm); return; } @@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ void icmpv6_ndo_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info) orig_ip = ipv6_hdr(skb_in)->saddr; ipv6_hdr(skb_in)->saddr = ct->tuplehash[0].tuple.src.u3.in6; - icmpv6_send(skb_in, type, code, info); + __icmpv6_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &parm); ipv6_hdr(skb_in)->saddr = orig_ip; out: consume_skb(cloned_skb);
The icmp{,v6}_send functions make all sorts of use of skb->cb, casting it with IPCB or IP6CB, assuming the skb to have come directly from the inet layer. But when the packet comes from the ndo layer, especially when forwarded, there's no telling what might be in skb->cb at that point. As a result, the icmp sending code risks reading bogus memory contents, which can result in nasty stack overflows such as this one reported by a user: panic+0x108/0x2ea __stack_chk_fail+0x14/0x20 __icmp_send+0x5bd/0x5c0 icmp_ndo_send+0x148/0x160 This is easy to simulate by doing a `memset(skb->cb, 0x41, sizeof(skb->cb));` before calling icmp{,v6}_ndo_send, and it's only by good fortune and the rarity of icmp sending from that context that we've avoided reports like this until now. For example, in KASAN: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __ip_options_echo+0xa0e/0x12b0 Write of size 38 at addr ffff888006f1f80e by task ping/89 CPU: 2 PID: 89 Comm: ping Not tainted 5.10.0-rc7-debug+ #5 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x9a/0xcc print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1a/0x160 __kasan_report.cold+0x20/0x38 kasan_report+0x32/0x40 check_memory_region+0x145/0x1a0 memcpy+0x39/0x60 __ip_options_echo+0xa0e/0x12b0 __icmp_send+0x744/0x1700 Actually, out of the 4 drivers that do this, only gtp zeroed the cb for the v4 case, while the rest did not. So this commit actually removes the gtp-specific zeroing, while putting the code where it belongs in the shared infrastructure of icmp{,v6}_ndo_send. This commit fixes the issue by passing an empty IPCB or IP6CB along to the functions that actually do the work. For the icmp_send, this was already trivial, thanks to __icmp_send providing the plumbing function. For icmpv6_send, this required a tiny bit of refactoring to make it behave like the v4 case, after which it was straight forward. Fixes: a2b78e9b2cac ("sunvnet: generate ICMP PTMUD messages for smaller port MTUs") Reported-by: SinYu <liuxyon@gmail.com> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAF=yD-LOF116aHub6RMe8vB8ZpnrrnoTdqhobEx+bvoA8AsP0w@mail.gmail.com/T/ Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> --- drivers/net/gtp.c | 1 - include/linux/icmpv6.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------ include/linux/ipv6.h | 1 - include/net/icmp.h | 6 +++++- net/ipv4/icmp.c | 5 +++-- net/ipv6/icmp.c | 18 +++++++++--------- net/ipv6/ip6_icmp.c | 7 ++++--- 7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) -- 2.30.1