ARM: OMAP1: fix incorrect kernel-doc comment syntax in file

The opening comment mark '/**' is used for highlighting the beginning of
kernel-doc comments.
The header for arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c follows this syntax, but the
content inside does not comply with kernel-doc.

This line was probably not meant for kernel-doc parsing, but is parsed
due to the presence of kernel-doc like comment syntax(i.e, '/**'), which
causes unexpected warning from kernel-doc:
"warning: expecting prototype for OMAP1 Dual(). Prototype was for OMAP1610_GPTIMER1_BASE() instead"

Provide a simple fix by replacing this occurrence with general comment
format, i.e. '/*', to prevent kernel-doc from parsing it.

Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com>
---
* Applies perfectly on next-20210326

 arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

On 3/30/21 1:53 PM, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
> The opening comment mark '/**' is used for highlighting the beginning of
> kernel-doc comments.
> The header for arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c follows this syntax, but the
> content inside does not comply with kernel-doc.
> 
> This line was probably not meant for kernel-doc parsing, but is parsed
> due to the presence of kernel-doc like comment syntax(i.e, '/**'), which
> causes unexpected warning from kernel-doc:
> "warning: expecting prototype for OMAP1 Dual(). Prototype was for OMAP1610_GPTIMER1_BASE() instead"
> 
> Provide a simple fix by replacing this occurrence with general comment
> format, i.e. '/*', to prevent kernel-doc from parsing it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

> ---
> * Applies perfectly on next-20210326
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> index 97fc2096b970..0411d5508d63 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/**
> +/*
>   * OMAP1 Dual-Mode Timers - platform device registration
>   *
>   * Contains first level initialization routines which internally
>

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 02:23:30AM +0530, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
> The opening comment mark '/**' is used for highlighting the beginning of
> kernel-doc comments.
> The header for arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c follows this syntax, but the
> content inside does not comply with kernel-doc.
> 
> This line was probably not meant for kernel-doc parsing, but is parsed
> due to the presence of kernel-doc like comment syntax(i.e, '/**'), which
> causes unexpected warning from kernel-doc:
> "warning: expecting prototype for OMAP1 Dual(). Prototype was for OMAP1610_GPTIMER1_BASE() instead"
> 
> Provide a simple fix by replacing this occurrence with general comment
> format, i.e. '/*', to prevent kernel-doc from parsing it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>

A.

> ---
> * Applies perfectly on next-20210326
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> index 97fc2096b970..0411d5508d63 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/**
> +/*
>   * OMAP1 Dual-Mode Timers - platform device registration
>   *
>   * Contains first level initialization routines which internally
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>

* Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com> [210330 23:54]:
> The opening comment mark '/**' is used for highlighting the beginning of

> kernel-doc comments.

> The header for arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c follows this syntax, but the

> content inside does not comply with kernel-doc.

> 

> This line was probably not meant for kernel-doc parsing, but is parsed

> due to the presence of kernel-doc like comment syntax(i.e, '/**'), which

> causes unexpected warning from kernel-doc:

> "warning: expecting prototype for OMAP1 Dual(). Prototype was for OMAP1610_GPTIMER1_BASE() instead"

> 

> Provide a simple fix by replacing this occurrence with general comment

> format, i.e. '/*', to prevent kernel-doc from parsing it.


Thanks applying into omap-for-v5.13/soc.

Tony