Message ID | 20210901092141.6451-2-zajec5@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
On 9/1/2021 4:36 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 10:21:55 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On 9/1/2021 2:21 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> >>> >>> Setting DSA_MAX_PORTS caused DSA to call b53 callbacks (e.g. >>> b53_disable_port() during dsa_register_switch()) for invalid >>> (non-existent) ports. That made b53 modify unrelated registers and is >>> one of reasons for a broken BCM5301x support. >>> >>> This problem exists for years but DSA_MAX_PORTS usage has changed few >>> times so it's hard to specify a single commit this change fixes. >> >> You should still try to identify the relevant tags that this is fixing >> such that this gets back ported to the appropriate trees. We could use >> Fixes: 7e99e3470172 ("net: dsa: remove dsa_switch_alloc helper"), to >> minimize the amount of work doing the back port. > > To be clear are you okay with the fixes tag you provided or should we > wait for Rafał to double check? That Fixes tag is correct and won't cause conflicts AFAICT with backports all the way down to that commit.
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c index dcf9d7e5ae14..5646eb8afe38 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c @@ -2615,6 +2615,8 @@ static int b53_switch_init(struct b53_device *dev) dev->enabled_ports |= BIT(dev->cpu_port); dev->num_ports = fls(dev->enabled_ports); + dev->ds->num_ports = min_t(unsigned int, dev->num_ports, DSA_MAX_PORTS); + /* Include non standard CPU port built-in PHYs to be probed */ if (is539x(dev) || is531x5(dev)) { for (i = 0; i < dev->num_ports; i++) { @@ -2659,7 +2661,6 @@ struct b53_device *b53_switch_alloc(struct device *base, return NULL; ds->dev = base; - ds->num_ports = DSA_MAX_PORTS; dev = devm_kzalloc(base, sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); if (!dev)