Message ID | 20220110095625.278836-1-javierm@redhat.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | video: A couple of fixes for the vga16fb driver | expand |
Hi, On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > This patch series contains two fixes for the vga16fb driver. I looked at > the driver due a regression reported [0], caused by commit d391c5827107 > ("drivers/firmware: move x86 Generic System Framebuffers support"). > > The mentioned commit didn't change any logic but just moved the platform > device registration that matches the vesafb and efifb drivers to happen > later. And this caused the vga16fb driver to be probed even in machines > that don't have an EGA or VGA video adapter. > > This is a v2 of the patch series that addresses issues pointed out by > Geert Uytterhoeven. > > Patch #1 is fixing the wrong check to determine if either EGA or VGA is > used and patch #2 adds a check to the driver to only be loaded for EGA > and VGA 16 color graphic cards. For both patches, Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Maxime
Hi Javier, Geert, et al, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Changes in v2: > - Make the change only for x86 (Geert Uytterhoeven) > - Only check the suppported video mode for x86 (Geert Uytterhoeven). I just updated Bug 215001 to reflect that I have tested this new, V2 patch against 4 systems, one more than last time - 2 BIOS/VGAC and 2 UEFI - and it works perfectly on all four. Thanks, Javier, for the excellent work! I didn't test with non-X86, but the code appears to bypass the patch on non-X86, so should work fine for Geert. Kris Tested-By: Kris Karas <bugs-a21@moonlit-rail.com>
Hi Kris, On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:19 AM Kris Karas (Bug reporting) <bugs-a21@moonlit-rail.com> wrote: > Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > Changes in v2: > > - Make the change only for x86 (Geert Uytterhoeven) > > - Only check the suppported video mode for x86 (Geert Uytterhoeven). > > I just updated Bug 215001 to reflect that I have tested this new, V2 > patch against 4 systems, one more than last time - 2 BIOS/VGAC and 2 > UEFI - and it works perfectly on all four. > > Thanks, Javier, for the excellent work! > I didn't test with non-X86, but the code appears to bypass the patch on > non-X86, so should work fine for Geert. Note that I can no longer test the PPC use case, as the hardware died a long time ago. > Tested-By: Kris Karas <bugs-a21@moonlit-rail.com> Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Hello Kris, On 1/12/22 03:19, Kris Karas (Bug reporting) wrote: > Hi Javier, Geert, et al, > > Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Changes in v2: >> - Make the change only for x86 (Geert Uytterhoeven) >> - Only check the suppported video mode for x86 (Geert Uytterhoeven). > > I just updated Bug 215001 to reflect that I have tested this new, V2 > patch against 4 systems, one more than last time - 2 BIOS/VGAC and 2 > UEFI - and it works perfectly on all four. > > Thanks, Javier, for the excellent work! > I didn't test with non-X86, but the code appears to bypass the patch on > non-X86, so should work fine for Geert. > > Kris > > Tested-By: Kris Karas <bugs-a21@moonlit-rail.com> > Thanks a lot for testing again! I've applied patch #1 to drm-misc-next and #2 to drm-misc-fixes. Best regards,