| Message ID | 20220113233358.17972-6-petr.vorel@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | msm8994-huawei-angler and msm8992-lg-bullhead sdhc1 fixes | expand |
Hi, please check if [1] can solve your clock issues, as it did for me. Konrad [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20211230023101.1122588-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org/
Hi Konrad, all, > Hi, please check if [1] can solve your clock issues, as it did for me. Thanks for info. I still need my patch "arm64: dts: qcom: msm8994: Provide missing "xo_board" and "sleep_clk" to GCC" [2] regardless I use "clk: qcom: gcc-msm8994: Remove NoC clocks" [1] or not. Kind regards, Petr > Konrad > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20211230023101.1122588-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220113233358.17972-4-petr.vorel@gmail.com/T/#u
> Hi Konrad, all, > >> Hi, please check if [1] can solve your clock issues, as it did for me. > Thanks for info. I still need my patch "arm64: dts: qcom: msm8994: Provide > missing "xo_board" and "sleep_clk" to GCC" [2] regardless I use "clk: qcom: > gcc-msm8994: Remove NoC clocks" [1] or not. Yeah, that slipped my watchlist as well. I was supposed to send this (or have sent in the past but then forgot to resubmit it? not sure tbf) before gcc changes landed, but I forgot to. Providing the clocks is required. Konrad > > Kind regards, > Petr > >> Konrad > >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20211230023101.1122588-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220113233358.17972-4-petr.vorel@gmail.com/T/#u >
On Thu 13 Jan 17:33 CST 2022, Petr Vorel wrote: > Although downstream supports HS400, there are overclocking warnings when > using mmc-hs400-1_8v: > > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 400000000 Hz, actual 768000000 Hz > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 400000000 Hz, actual 768000000 Hz > mmc0: new HS400 MMC card at address 0001 > > Using HS200 (i.e. mmc-hs200-1_8v or mmc-ddr-1_8v) would reduce them: > > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz > mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001 > > But as the problem is probably elsewhere (bullhead behaves the same), > keep mmc-hs400-1_8v. > > Angler does not have SD card, thus explicitly disable sdhc2. > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com> > --- > .../dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts > index 0e3dd48f0dbf..5ce3dc169bb4 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > /dts-v1/; > > #include "msm8994.dtsi" > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> > > /* Angler's firmware does not report where the memory is allocated */ > /delete-node/ &cont_splash_mem; > @@ -41,3 +42,18 @@ serial@f991e000 { > &tlmm { > gpio-reserved-ranges = <85 4>; > }; > + > +/* > + * Although downstream supports also HS400 there are fewer overclocking > + * warnings when used DDR, also LK bootloader reports DDR mode. > + */ > +&sdhc1 { > + status = "okay"; > + > + mmc-hs400-1_8v; > +}; > + > +/* Angler does not have SD card */ > +&sdhc2 { But isn't &sdhc2 already disabled from msm8992.dtsi and msm8994.dtsi? Regards, Bjorn > + status = "disabled"; > +}; > -- > 2.34.1 >
Hi Bjorn, > On Thu 13 Jan 17:33 CST 2022, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Although downstream supports HS400, there are overclocking warnings when > > using mmc-hs400-1_8v: > > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz > > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz > > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz > > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 400000000 Hz, actual 768000000 Hz > > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 400000000 Hz, actual 768000000 Hz > > mmc0: new HS400 MMC card at address 0001 > > Using HS200 (i.e. mmc-hs200-1_8v or mmc-ddr-1_8v) would reduce them: > > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz > > mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz > > mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001 > > But as the problem is probably elsewhere (bullhead behaves the same), > > keep mmc-hs400-1_8v. > > Angler does not have SD card, thus explicitly disable sdhc2. > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com> > > --- > > .../dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts > > index 0e3dd48f0dbf..5ce3dc169bb4 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > > /dts-v1/; > > #include "msm8994.dtsi" > > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> > > /* Angler's firmware does not report where the memory is allocated */ > > /delete-node/ &cont_splash_mem; > > @@ -41,3 +42,18 @@ serial@f991e000 { > > &tlmm { > > gpio-reserved-ranges = <85 4>; > > }; > > + > > +/* > > + * Although downstream supports also HS400 there are fewer overclocking > > + * warnings when used DDR, also LK bootloader reports DDR mode. > > + */ > > +&sdhc1 { > > + status = "okay"; > > + > > + mmc-hs400-1_8v; > > +}; > > + > > +/* Angler does not have SD card */ > > +&sdhc2 { > But isn't &sdhc2 already disabled from msm8992.dtsi and msm8994.dtsi? Yes it's disabled, thus this is not needed. I'll send v2 of this, where I remove this. Kind regards, Petr > Regards, > Bjorn
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts index 0e3dd48f0dbf..5ce3dc169bb4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ /dts-v1/; #include "msm8994.dtsi" +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> /* Angler's firmware does not report where the memory is allocated */ /delete-node/ &cont_splash_mem; @@ -41,3 +42,18 @@ serial@f991e000 { &tlmm { gpio-reserved-ranges = <85 4>; }; + +/* + * Although downstream supports also HS400 there are fewer overclocking + * warnings when used DDR, also LK bootloader reports DDR mode. + */ +&sdhc1 { + status = "okay"; + + mmc-hs400-1_8v; +}; + +/* Angler does not have SD card */ +&sdhc2 { + status = "disabled"; +};
Although downstream supports HS400, there are overclocking warnings when using mmc-hs400-1_8v: mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 400000000 Hz, actual 768000000 Hz mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 400000000 Hz, actual 768000000 Hz mmc0: new HS400 MMC card at address 0001 Using HS200 (i.e. mmc-hs200-1_8v or mmc-ddr-1_8v) would reduce them: mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz mmc0: Card appears overclocked; req 200000000 Hz, actual 384000000 Hz mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001 But as the problem is probably elsewhere (bullhead behaves the same), keep mmc-hs400-1_8v. Angler does not have SD card, thus explicitly disable sdhc2. Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com> --- .../dts/qcom/msm8994-huawei-angler-rev-101.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)