| Message ID | 20220819092446.980320-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Backports to fix random core | expand |
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:24:37AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Hi, > > in v4.9.320 some random-core patches broke RT. This is a series of > backports to align with later RT versions and keep things working again. > > Sebastian Thanks so much! --mark
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:24:37AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Hi, > > in v4.9.320 some random-core patches broke RT. This is a series of > backports to align with later RT versions and keep things working again. > > Sebastian Sorry for taking so long to start working these. Are these patches to be applied to v4.9.320, or to the RT patches prior to the linux-stable merge? Or are these patches the updates to the patches that conflict with v4.9.320 as I rebase? I'm guessing the latter as the patches don't seem to work on just the last RT release or v4.9.320 directly. Bottom line, I'm not sure how you expected me to use these 9 patches. Sorry for being dense. --mark
On 2022-09-01 14:16:22 [-0700], Mark Gross wrote: > Sorry for taking so long to start working these. Are these patches to be > applied to v4.9.320, or to the RT patches prior to the linux-stable merge? > > Or are these patches the updates to the patches that conflict with v4.9.320 as > I rebase? > > I'm guessing the latter as the patches don't seem to work on just the last RT > release or v4.9.320 directly. > > Bottom line, I'm not sure how you expected me to use these 9 patches. The commit I cited was backported into v4.9-stable, I *think* it is part of v4.9-stable as of v4.9.320. If you apply the RT queue then you should have conflicts. The "old" RT patches for random are obsolete if I remember correctly. > Sorry for being dense. No worries. If in doubt, make a -rc and let me look over it or if completely in doubt yell and I prepare a complete queue. > --mark Sebastian