mbox series

[v4,net-next,0/8] introduce WED RX support to MT7986 SoC

Message ID cover.1667687249.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
Headers show
Series introduce WED RX support to MT7986 SoC | expand

Message

Lorenzo Bianconi Nov. 5, 2022, 10:36 p.m. UTC
Similar to TX counterpart available on MT7622 and MT7986, introduce
RX Wireless Ethernet Dispatch available on MT7986 SoC in order to
offload traffic received by wlan nic to the wired interfaces (lan/wan).

Changes since v3:
- remove reset property in ethsys dts node
- rely on readx_poll_timeout in wo mcu code
- fix typos
- move wo-ccif binding in soc folder
- use reserved-memory for wo-dlm
- improve wo-ccif binding

Changes since v2:
- rely on of_reserved_mem APIs in mcu code
- add some dts fixes
- rename {tx,rx}_wdma in {rx,tx}_wdma
- update entry in maintainers file

Changes since v1:
- fix sparse warnings
- rely on memory-region property in mt7622-wed.yaml
- some more binding fixes

Lorenzo Bianconi (7):
  arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7986: add support for RX Wireless Ethernet
    Dispatch
  dt-bindings: net: mediatek: add WED RX binding for MT7986 eth driver
  net: ethernet: mtk_wed: introduce wed wo support
  net: ethernet: mtk_wed: rename tx_wdma array in rx_wdma
  net: ethernet: mtk_wed: add configure wed wo support
  net: ethernet: mtk_wed: add rx mib counters
  MAINTAINERS: update MEDIATEK ETHERNET entry

Sujuan Chen (1):
  net: ethernet: mtk_wed: introduce wed mcu support

 .../arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt7622-wed.yaml     |  52 ++
 .../soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt7986-wo-ccif.yaml |  51 ++
 MAINTAINERS                                   |   1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7986a.dtsi     |  65 ++
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/Makefile        |   2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c       | 619 ++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.h       |  21 +
 .../net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_debugfs.c   |  87 +++
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_mcu.c   | 387 +++++++++++
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_regs.h  | 129 +++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_wo.c    | 508 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_wo.h    | 282 ++++++++
 include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h          | 106 ++-
 13 files changed, 2256 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt7986-wo-ccif.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_mcu.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_wo.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_wo.h

Comments

Matthias Brugger Nov. 9, 2022, 7:24 p.m. UTC | #1
On 09/11/2022 20:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:03:40 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>> I noticed today the series state is 'Awaiting Upstream'. I am wondering if
>> this series is expected to go through a different tree, e.g. wireless one
>> (adding Kalle in cc). In this particular case the series changes only
>> the mtk ethernet driver and mt76 is built since we modify a common include (but
>> there are no changes in mt76). My personal opinion is this series is suited to
>> go through net-next tree but I would be fine even if it goes through Kalle's
>> one. Any opinions?
> 
> Works either way, we'll see what Kalle says.
> Let me bring it back to Under review in the meantime.
> 
> While I have you - no acks for the bindings yet? On previous versions?

Please beware that the first patch should go through my tree. Let me know when 
things got merged and I'll take it.

Regards,
Matthias
Lorenzo Bianconi Nov. 9, 2022, 7:26 p.m. UTC | #2
On Nov 09, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/11/2022 20:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:03:40 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > I noticed today the series state is 'Awaiting Upstream'. I am wondering if
> > > this series is expected to go through a different tree, e.g. wireless one
> > > (adding Kalle in cc). In this particular case the series changes only
> > > the mtk ethernet driver and mt76 is built since we modify a common include (but
> > > there are no changes in mt76). My personal opinion is this series is suited to
> > > go through net-next tree but I would be fine even if it goes through Kalle's
> > > one. Any opinions?
> > 
> > Works either way, we'll see what Kalle says.
> > Let me bring it back to Under review in the meantime.
> > 
> > While I have you - no acks for the bindings yet? On previous versions?
> 
> Please beware that the first patch should go through my tree. Let me know
> when things got merged and I'll take it.

ack thx, will do.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> Regards,
> Matthias