Message ID | 20221123152134.179929-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | virtio fixes | expand |
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > Hi, > > This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the > previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a > different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy but > wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration > and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code. > The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded > function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally > fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned up > functions. > > I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as > well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the > VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked > at over the 8.0 cycle. Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your 2/2 broke it previously ... > Alex Bennée (2): > include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables > include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start > > include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++--- > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.34.1
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the >> previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a >> different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy but >> wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration >> and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code. >> The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded >> function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally >> fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned up >> functions. >> >> I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as >> well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the >> VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked >> at over the 8.0 cycle. > > > Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your > 2/2 broke it previously ... Looking into it now - so far hasn't broken locally but I guess there is something different about the CI. > >> Alex Bennée (2): >> include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables >> include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start >> >> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++--- >> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.34.1
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the > >> previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a > >> different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy but > >> wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration > >> and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code. > >> The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded > >> function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally > >> fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned up > >> functions. > >> > >> I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as > >> well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the > >> VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked > >> at over the 8.0 cycle. > > > > > > Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your > > 2/2 broke it previously ... > > Looking into it now - so far hasn't broken locally but I guess there is > something different about the CI. yes - pls push to gitlab, create pipeline e.g. with QEMU_CI set to 2 Or with QEMU_CI set to 1 and then run fedora container and then clang-system manually. > > > >> Alex Bennée (2): > >> include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables > >> include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start > >> > >> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++--- > >> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > >> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >> > >> -- > >> 2.34.1 > > > -- > Alex Bennée
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the >> >> previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a >> >> different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy but >> >> wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration >> >> and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code. >> >> The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded >> >> function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally >> >> fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned up >> >> functions. >> >> >> >> I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as >> >> well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the >> >> VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked >> >> at over the 8.0 cycle. >> > >> > >> > Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your >> > 2/2 broke it previously ... >> >> Looking into it now - so far hasn't broken locally but I guess there is >> something different about the CI. > > > yes - pls push to gitlab, create pipeline e.g. with QEMU_CI set to 2 > > Or with QEMU_CI set to 1 and then run fedora container and then > clang-system manually. I'm having trouble re-creating the failures in CI locally on my boxen. I have triggered a bug on s390 but that looks like a pre-existing problem with VRING_SET_ENDIAN being triggered for the vhost-user-gpio tests. I think that is a limitation of the test harness. Will keep looking. > >> > >> >> Alex Bennée (2): >> >> include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables >> >> include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start >> >> >> >> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++--- >> >> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> >> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> -- >> >> 2.34.1 >> >> >> -- >> Alex Bennée
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:21:15AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> > >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the > >> >> previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a > >> >> different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy but > >> >> wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration > >> >> and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code. > >> >> The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded > >> >> function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally > >> >> fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned up > >> >> functions. > >> >> > >> >> I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as > >> >> well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the > >> >> VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked > >> >> at over the 8.0 cycle. > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your > >> > 2/2 broke it previously ... > >> > >> Looking into it now - so far hasn't broken locally but I guess there is > >> something different about the CI. > > > > > > yes - pls push to gitlab, create pipeline e.g. with QEMU_CI set to 2 > > > > Or with QEMU_CI set to 1 and then run fedora container and then > > clang-system manually. > > I'm having trouble re-creating the failures in CI locally on my boxen. I > have triggered a bug on s390 but that looks like a pre-existing problem > with VRING_SET_ENDIAN being triggered for the vhost-user-gpio tests. I > think that is a limitation of the test harness. > > Will keep looking. Why not just trigger it on gitlab CI - it's very repeatable there? > > > >> > > >> >> Alex Bennée (2): > >> >> include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables > >> >> include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start > >> >> > >> >> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++--- > >> >> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > >> >> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> 2.34.1 > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Alex Bennée > > > -- > Alex Bennée
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:21:15AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the >> >> >> previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a >> >> >> different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy but >> >> >> wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration >> >> >> and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code. >> >> >> The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded >> >> >> function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally >> >> >> fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned up >> >> >> functions. >> >> >> >> >> >> I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as >> >> >> well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the >> >> >> VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked >> >> >> at over the 8.0 cycle. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your >> >> > 2/2 broke it previously ... >> >> >> >> Looking into it now - so far hasn't broken locally but I guess there is >> >> something different about the CI. >> > >> > >> > yes - pls push to gitlab, create pipeline e.g. with QEMU_CI set to 2 >> > >> > Or with QEMU_CI set to 1 and then run fedora container and then >> > clang-system manually. >> >> I'm having trouble re-creating the failures in CI locally on my boxen. I >> have triggered a bug on s390 but that looks like a pre-existing problem >> with VRING_SET_ENDIAN being triggered for the vhost-user-gpio tests. I >> think that is a limitation of the test harness. >> >> Will keep looking. > > Why not just trigger it on gitlab CI - it's very repeatable there? I've got a fix for gpio and am running it through CI now: https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/pipelines/704285944 My main concern is I had to do something no other vhost-user device does and I'm not sure if thats down to misunderstanding or the other devices just getting lucky.
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:21:15AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the >> >> >> previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a >> >> >> different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy but >> >> >> wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration >> >> >> and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code. >> >> >> The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded >> >> >> function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally >> >> >> fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned up >> >> >> functions. >> >> >> >> >> >> I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as >> >> >> well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the >> >> >> VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked >> >> >> at over the 8.0 cycle. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your >> >> > 2/2 broke it previously ... >> >> >> >> Looking into it now - so far hasn't broken locally but I guess there is >> >> something different about the CI. >> > >> > >> > yes - pls push to gitlab, create pipeline e.g. with QEMU_CI set to 2 >> > >> > Or with QEMU_CI set to 1 and then run fedora container and then >> > clang-system manually. >> >> I'm having trouble re-creating the failures in CI locally on my boxen. I >> have triggered a bug on s390 but that looks like a pre-existing problem >> with VRING_SET_ENDIAN being triggered for the vhost-user-gpio tests. I >> think that is a limitation of the test harness. >> >> Will keep looking. > > Why not just trigger it on gitlab CI - it's very repeatable there? I can repeat a problem locally on Debian Bullseye and Ubuntu 22.04 with clang and leak sanitizer: # QEMU configure log Thu 24 Nov 16:02:56 GMT 2022 # Configured with: '../../configure' '--cc=clang' '--cxx=clang++' '--enable-sanitizers' '--target-list=arm-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,i386-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu'# And the command: env QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-arm QTEST_QEMU_STORAGE_DAEMON_BINARY=./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img MALLOC_PERTURB_=178 G_TEST_DBUS_DAEMON=/home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/tests/dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh ./tests/qtest/qos-test -p /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/vhost-user-gpio-device/vhost-user-gpio/vhost-user-gpio-tests/read-guest-mem/memfile/subprocess Gives the following failure, while a leak may not be that exciting it does point to a potential corruption issue. Unfortunately I don't get a decent backtrace from the tool: # random seed: R02S071fe8d68317a8b01e5e7fadbf1ac60a # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-arm -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-1024352.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-1024352.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -machine none -accel qtest ==1024354==WARNING: ASan doesn't fully support makecontext/swapcontext functions and may produce false positives in some cases! # Start of arm tests # Start of virt tests # Start of virtio-mmio tests # Start of virtio-bus tests # Start of vhost-user-gpio-device tests # Start of vhost-user-gpio tests # Start of vhost-user-gpio-tests tests # Start of read-guest-mem tests # Start of memfile tests # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-arm -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-1024352.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-1024352.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -M virt -device vhost-user-gpio-device,id=gpio0,chardev=chr-vhost-user-test -m 256 -object memory-backend-memfd,id=mem,size=256M, -numa node,memdev=mem -chardev socket,id=chr-vhost-user-test,path=/tmp/vhost-test-8DD2V1/vhost-user-test.sock -accel qtest # GLib-DEBUG: setenv()/putenv() are not thread-safe and should not be used after threads are created ==1024371==WARNING: ASan doesn't fully support makecontext/swapcontext functions and may produce false positives in some cases! # set_protocol_features: 0x200 # set_owner: start of session # vhost-user: un-handled message: 14 # vhost-user: un-handled message: 14 # set_vring_num: 0/1024 qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. qemu-system-arm: vhost VQ 0 ring restore failed: -22: Invalid argument (22) qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. qemu-system-arm: vhost VQ 1 ring restore failed: -22: Invalid argument (22) qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. qemu-system-arm: vhost_set_vring_call failed: Invalid argument (22) qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. qemu-system-arm: vhost_set_vring_call failed: Invalid argument (22) ok 1 /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/vhost-user-gpio-device/vhost-user-gpio/vhost-user-gpio-tests/read-guest-mem/memfile/subprocess # SKIP No memory at address 0x0 # End of memfile tests # End of read-guest-mem tests # End of vhost-user-gpio-tests tests # End of vhost-user-gpio tests # End of vhost-user-gpio-device tests # End of virtio-bus tests # End of virtio-mmio tests # End of virt tests # End of arm tests 1..1 ================================================================= ==1024371==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 240 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x561d9a5d7a18 in __interceptor_calloc (/home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/qemu-system-arm+0x1d1fa18) (BuildId: 0bdc7c2ada2277089db16d57f17c314e9e53e41c) #1 0x7f46ee656c40 in g_malloc0 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5ec40) (BuildId: 0ab0b740e34eeb0c84656ba53737f4c440dfbed4) #2 0x561d9bf7875b in virtio_device_realize /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../hw/virtio/virtio.c:4175:9 #3 0x561d9c321bf4 in device_set_realized /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../hw/core/qdev.c:566:13 #4 0x561d9c33dda8 in property_set_bool /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/object.c:2285:5 #5 0x561d9c338fb3 in object_property_set /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/object.c:1420:5 #6 0x561d9c344c7c in object_property_set_qobject /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/qom-qobject.c:28:10 #7 0x561d9b367954 in qdev_device_add /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/qdev-monitor.c:733:11 #8 0x561d9b36f832 in qemu_create_cli_devices /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:2536:5 #9 0x561d9b36f832 in qmp_x_exit_preconfig /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:2604:5 #10 0x561d9b37613f in qemu_init /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:3601:9 #11 0x561d9a6125a5 in main /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/main.c:47:5 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 240 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s). ../../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:179: kill_qemu() tried to terminate QEMU process but encountered exit status 1 (expected 0) fish: Job 1, 'env QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-sy…' terminated by signal SIGABRT (Abort) 🕙22:26:18 alex.bennee@hackbox2:qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers on for-7.2/virtio-fixes [$?] [⚡ IOT] ✗ >> > >> >> > >> >> >> Alex Bennée (2): >> >> >> include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables >> >> >> include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start >> >> >> >> >> >> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++--- >> >> >> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> >> >> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> 2.34.1 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Alex Bennée >> >> >> -- >> Alex Bennée
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:24:14PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:21:15AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> > >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> >> > >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> >> >> Hi, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the > >> >> >> previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a > >> >> >> different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy but > >> >> >> wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration > >> >> >> and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code. > >> >> >> The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded > >> >> >> function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally > >> >> >> fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned up > >> >> >> functions. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as > >> >> >> well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the > >> >> >> VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked > >> >> >> at over the 8.0 cycle. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your > >> >> > 2/2 broke it previously ... > >> >> > >> >> Looking into it now - so far hasn't broken locally but I guess there is > >> >> something different about the CI. > >> > > >> > > >> > yes - pls push to gitlab, create pipeline e.g. with QEMU_CI set to 2 > >> > > >> > Or with QEMU_CI set to 1 and then run fedora container and then > >> > clang-system manually. > >> > >> I'm having trouble re-creating the failures in CI locally on my boxen. I > >> have triggered a bug on s390 but that looks like a pre-existing problem > >> with VRING_SET_ENDIAN being triggered for the vhost-user-gpio tests. I > >> think that is a limitation of the test harness. > >> > >> Will keep looking. > > > > Why not just trigger it on gitlab CI - it's very repeatable there? > > I can repeat a problem locally on Debian Bullseye and Ubuntu 22.04 with clang and leak sanitizer: > > # QEMU configure log Thu 24 Nov 16:02:56 GMT 2022 > # Configured with: '../../configure' '--cc=clang' '--cxx=clang++' '--enable-sanitizers' '--target-list=arm-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,i386-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu'# > > And the command: > > env QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-arm QTEST_QEMU_STORAGE_DAEMON_BINARY=./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img MALLOC_PERTURB_=178 G_TEST_DBUS_DAEMON=/home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/tests/dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh ./tests/qtest/qos-test -p /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/vhost-user-gpio-device/vhost-user-gpio/vhost-user-gpio-tests/read-guest-mem/memfile/subprocess > > Gives the following failure, while a leak may not be that exciting it > does point to a potential corruption issue. Unfortunately I don't get a > decent backtrace from the tool: > > # random seed: R02S071fe8d68317a8b01e5e7fadbf1ac60a > # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-arm -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-1024352.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-1024352.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -machine none -accel qtest > ==1024354==WARNING: ASan doesn't fully support makecontext/swapcontext functions and may produce false positives in some cases! > # Start of arm tests > # Start of virt tests > # Start of virtio-mmio tests > # Start of virtio-bus tests > # Start of vhost-user-gpio-device tests > # Start of vhost-user-gpio tests > # Start of vhost-user-gpio-tests tests > # Start of read-guest-mem tests > # Start of memfile tests > # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-arm -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-1024352.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-1024352.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -M virt -device vhost-user-gpio-device,id=gpio0,chardev=chr-vhost-user-test -m 256 -object memory-backend-memfd,id=mem,size=256M, -numa node,memdev=mem -chardev socket,id=chr-vhost-user-test,path=/tmp/vhost-test-8DD2V1/vhost-user-test.sock -accel qtest > # GLib-DEBUG: setenv()/putenv() are not thread-safe and should not be used after threads are created > ==1024371==WARNING: ASan doesn't fully support makecontext/swapcontext functions and may produce false positives in some cases! > # set_protocol_features: 0x200 > # set_owner: start of session > # vhost-user: un-handled message: 14 > # vhost-user: un-handled message: 14 > # set_vring_num: 0/1024 > qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. > qemu-system-arm: vhost VQ 0 ring restore failed: -22: Invalid argument (22) > qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. > qemu-system-arm: vhost VQ 1 ring restore failed: -22: Invalid argument (22) > qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. > qemu-system-arm: vhost_set_vring_call failed: Invalid argument (22) > qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. > qemu-system-arm: vhost_set_vring_call failed: Invalid argument (22) > ok 1 /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/vhost-user-gpio-device/vhost-user-gpio/vhost-user-gpio-tests/read-guest-mem/memfile/subprocess # SKIP No memory at address 0x0 > # End of memfile tests > # End of read-guest-mem tests > # End of vhost-user-gpio-tests tests > # End of vhost-user-gpio tests > # End of vhost-user-gpio-device tests > # End of virtio-bus tests > # End of virtio-mmio tests > # End of virt tests > # End of arm tests > 1..1 > > ================================================================= > ==1024371==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks > > Direct leak of 240 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x561d9a5d7a18 in __interceptor_calloc (/home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/qemu-system-arm+0x1d1fa18) (BuildId: 0bdc7c2ada2277089db16d57f17c314e9e53e41c) > #1 0x7f46ee656c40 in g_malloc0 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5ec40) (BuildId: 0ab0b740e34eeb0c84656ba53737f4c440dfbed4) > #2 0x561d9bf7875b in virtio_device_realize /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../hw/virtio/virtio.c:4175:9 > #3 0x561d9c321bf4 in device_set_realized /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../hw/core/qdev.c:566:13 > #4 0x561d9c33dda8 in property_set_bool /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/object.c:2285:5 > #5 0x561d9c338fb3 in object_property_set /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/object.c:1420:5 > #6 0x561d9c344c7c in object_property_set_qobject /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/qom-qobject.c:28:10 > #7 0x561d9b367954 in qdev_device_add /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/qdev-monitor.c:733:11 > #8 0x561d9b36f832 in qemu_create_cli_devices /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:2536:5 > #9 0x561d9b36f832 in qmp_x_exit_preconfig /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:2604:5 > #10 0x561d9b37613f in qemu_init /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:3601:9 > #11 0x561d9a6125a5 in main /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/main.c:47:5 > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 240 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s). > ../../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:179: kill_qemu() tried to terminate QEMU process but encountered exit status 1 (expected 0) > fish: Job 1, 'env QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-sy…' terminated by signal SIGABRT (Abort) > 🕙22:26:18 alex.bennee@hackbox2:qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers on for-7.2/virtio-fixes [$?] [⚡ IOT] > ✗ ok ... was gpio always like this? from 1st commit? if not bisect? > > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> Alex Bennée (2): > >> >> >> include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables > >> >> >> include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start > >> >> >> > >> >> >> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++--- > >> >> >> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > >> >> >> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> 2.34.1 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Alex Bennée > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Alex Bennée > > > -- > Alex Bennée
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:24:14PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:21:15AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the >> >> >> >> previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a >> >> >> >> different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy but >> >> >> >> wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration >> >> >> >> and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code. >> >> >> >> The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded >> >> >> >> function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally >> >> >> >> fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned up >> >> >> >> functions. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as >> >> >> >> well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the >> >> >> >> VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked >> >> >> >> at over the 8.0 cycle. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your >> >> >> > 2/2 broke it previously ... >> >> >> >> >> >> Looking into it now - so far hasn't broken locally but I guess there is >> >> >> something different about the CI. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > yes - pls push to gitlab, create pipeline e.g. with QEMU_CI set to 2 >> >> > >> >> > Or with QEMU_CI set to 1 and then run fedora container and then >> >> > clang-system manually. >> >> >> >> I'm having trouble re-creating the failures in CI locally on my boxen. I >> >> have triggered a bug on s390 but that looks like a pre-existing problem >> >> with VRING_SET_ENDIAN being triggered for the vhost-user-gpio tests. I >> >> think that is a limitation of the test harness. >> >> >> >> Will keep looking. >> > >> > Why not just trigger it on gitlab CI - it's very repeatable there? >> >> I can repeat a problem locally on Debian Bullseye and Ubuntu 22.04 with clang and leak sanitizer: >> >> # QEMU configure log Thu 24 Nov 16:02:56 GMT 2022 >> # Configured with: '../../configure' '--cc=clang' '--cxx=clang++' '--enable-sanitizers' '--target-list=arm-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,i386-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu'# >> >> And the command: >> >> env QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-arm QTEST_QEMU_STORAGE_DAEMON_BINARY=./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img MALLOC_PERTURB_=178 G_TEST_DBUS_DAEMON=/home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/tests/dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh ./tests/qtest/qos-test -p /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/vhost-user-gpio-device/vhost-user-gpio/vhost-user-gpio-tests/read-guest-mem/memfile/subprocess >> >> Gives the following failure, while a leak may not be that exciting it >> does point to a potential corruption issue. Unfortunately I don't get a >> decent backtrace from the tool: >> >> # random seed: R02S071fe8d68317a8b01e5e7fadbf1ac60a >> # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-arm -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-1024352.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-1024352.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -machine none -accel qtest >> ==1024354==WARNING: ASan doesn't fully support makecontext/swapcontext functions and may produce false positives in some cases! >> # Start of arm tests >> # Start of virt tests >> # Start of virtio-mmio tests >> # Start of virtio-bus tests >> # Start of vhost-user-gpio-device tests >> # Start of vhost-user-gpio tests >> # Start of vhost-user-gpio-tests tests >> # Start of read-guest-mem tests >> # Start of memfile tests >> # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-arm -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-1024352.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-1024352.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -M virt -device vhost-user-gpio-device,id=gpio0,chardev=chr-vhost-user-test -m 256 -object memory-backend-memfd,id=mem,size=256M, -numa node,memdev=mem -chardev socket,id=chr-vhost-user-test,path=/tmp/vhost-test-8DD2V1/vhost-user-test.sock -accel qtest >> # GLib-DEBUG: setenv()/putenv() are not thread-safe and should not be used after threads are created >> ==1024371==WARNING: ASan doesn't fully support makecontext/swapcontext functions and may produce false positives in some cases! >> # set_protocol_features: 0x200 >> # set_owner: start of session >> # vhost-user: un-handled message: 14 >> # vhost-user: un-handled message: 14 >> # set_vring_num: 0/1024 >> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. >> qemu-system-arm: vhost VQ 0 ring restore failed: -22: Invalid argument (22) >> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. >> qemu-system-arm: vhost VQ 1 ring restore failed: -22: Invalid argument (22) >> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. >> qemu-system-arm: vhost_set_vring_call failed: Invalid argument (22) >> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. >> qemu-system-arm: vhost_set_vring_call failed: Invalid argument (22) >> ok 1 /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/vhost-user-gpio-device/vhost-user-gpio/vhost-user-gpio-tests/read-guest-mem/memfile/subprocess # SKIP No memory at address 0x0 >> # End of memfile tests >> # End of read-guest-mem tests >> # End of vhost-user-gpio-tests tests >> # End of vhost-user-gpio tests >> # End of vhost-user-gpio-device tests >> # End of virtio-bus tests >> # End of virtio-mmio tests >> # End of virt tests >> # End of arm tests >> 1..1 >> >> ================================================================= >> ==1024371==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks >> >> Direct leak of 240 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: >> #0 0x561d9a5d7a18 in __interceptor_calloc (/home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/qemu-system-arm+0x1d1fa18) (BuildId: 0bdc7c2ada2277089db16d57f17c314e9e53e41c) >> #1 0x7f46ee656c40 in g_malloc0 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5ec40) (BuildId: 0ab0b740e34eeb0c84656ba53737f4c440dfbed4) >> #2 0x561d9bf7875b in virtio_device_realize /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../hw/virtio/virtio.c:4175:9 >> #3 0x561d9c321bf4 in device_set_realized /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../hw/core/qdev.c:566:13 >> #4 0x561d9c33dda8 in property_set_bool /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/object.c:2285:5 >> #5 0x561d9c338fb3 in object_property_set /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/object.c:1420:5 >> #6 0x561d9c344c7c in object_property_set_qobject /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/qom-qobject.c:28:10 >> #7 0x561d9b367954 in qdev_device_add /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/qdev-monitor.c:733:11 >> #8 0x561d9b36f832 in qemu_create_cli_devices /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:2536:5 >> #9 0x561d9b36f832 in qmp_x_exit_preconfig /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:2604:5 >> #10 0x561d9b37613f in qemu_init /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:3601:9 >> #11 0x561d9a6125a5 in main /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/main.c:47:5 >> >> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 240 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s). >> ../../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:179: kill_qemu() tried to terminate QEMU process but encountered exit status 1 (expected 0) >> fish: Job 1, 'env QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-sy…' terminated by signal SIGABRT (Abort) >> 🕙22:26:18 alex.bennee@hackbox2:qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers on for-7.2/virtio-fixes [$?] [⚡ IOT] >> ✗ > > > ok ... was gpio always like this? from 1st commit? if not bisect? I think so. I've managed to track down what the malloc is. It's the memory allocated by: gpio->vhost_dev.vqs = g_new0(struct vhost_virtqueue, gpio->vhost_dev.nvqs); It is never freed because we never get to vu_gpio_device_unrealize() but as far as I can tell none of the qtests ever trigger the unrealize() so I'm not sure why it is special. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Alex Bennée (2): >> >> >> >> include/hw: attempt to document VirtIO feature variables >> >> >> >> include/hw: VM state takes precedence in virtio_device_should_start >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++--- >> >> >> >> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> >> >> >> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> 2.34.1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Alex Bennée >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Alex Bennée >> >> >> -- >> Alex Bennée
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:24:14PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:21:15AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:21:32PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> This hopefully fixes the problems with VirtIO migration caused by the >> >> >> >> previous refactoring of virtio_device_started(). That introduced a >> >> >> >> different order of checking which didn't give the VM state primacy but >> >> >> >> wasn't noticed as we don't properly exercise VirtIO device migration >> >> >> >> and caused issues when dev->started wasn't checked in the core code. >> >> >> >> The introduction of virtio_device_should_start() split the overloaded >> >> >> >> function up but the broken order still remained. The series finally >> >> >> >> fixes that by restoring the original semantics but with the cleaned up >> >> >> >> functions. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I've added more documentation to the various structures involved as >> >> >> >> well as the functions. There is still some inconsistencies in the >> >> >> >> VirtIO code between different devices but I think that can be looked >> >> >> >> at over the 8.0 cycle. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks a lot! Did you try this with gitlab CI? A patch similar to your >> >> >> > 2/2 broke it previously ... >> >> >> >> >> >> Looking into it now - so far hasn't broken locally but I guess there is >> >> >> something different about the CI. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > yes - pls push to gitlab, create pipeline e.g. with QEMU_CI set to 2 >> >> > >> >> > Or with QEMU_CI set to 1 and then run fedora container and then >> >> > clang-system manually. >> >> >> >> I'm having trouble re-creating the failures in CI locally on my boxen. I >> >> have triggered a bug on s390 but that looks like a pre-existing problem >> >> with VRING_SET_ENDIAN being triggered for the vhost-user-gpio tests. I >> >> think that is a limitation of the test harness. >> >> >> >> Will keep looking. >> > >> > Why not just trigger it on gitlab CI - it's very repeatable there? >> >> I can repeat a problem locally on Debian Bullseye and Ubuntu 22.04 with clang and leak sanitizer: >> >> # QEMU configure log Thu 24 Nov 16:02:56 GMT 2022 >> # Configured with: '../../configure' '--cc=clang' '--cxx=clang++' '--enable-sanitizers' '--target-list=arm-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,i386-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu'# >> >> And the command: >> >> env QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-arm QTEST_QEMU_STORAGE_DAEMON_BINARY=./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img MALLOC_PERTURB_=178 G_TEST_DBUS_DAEMON=/home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/tests/dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh ./tests/qtest/qos-test -p /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/vhost-user-gpio-device/vhost-user-gpio/vhost-user-gpio-tests/read-guest-mem/memfile/subprocess >> >> Gives the following failure, while a leak may not be that exciting it >> does point to a potential corruption issue. Unfortunately I don't get a >> decent backtrace from the tool: >> >> # random seed: R02S071fe8d68317a8b01e5e7fadbf1ac60a >> # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-arm -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-1024352.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-1024352.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -machine none -accel qtest >> ==1024354==WARNING: ASan doesn't fully support makecontext/swapcontext functions and may produce false positives in some cases! >> # Start of arm tests >> # Start of virt tests >> # Start of virtio-mmio tests >> # Start of virtio-bus tests >> # Start of vhost-user-gpio-device tests >> # Start of vhost-user-gpio tests >> # Start of vhost-user-gpio-tests tests >> # Start of read-guest-mem tests >> # Start of memfile tests >> # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-arm -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-1024352.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-1024352.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -M virt -device vhost-user-gpio-device,id=gpio0,chardev=chr-vhost-user-test -m 256 -object memory-backend-memfd,id=mem,size=256M, -numa node,memdev=mem -chardev socket,id=chr-vhost-user-test,path=/tmp/vhost-test-8DD2V1/vhost-user-test.sock -accel qtest >> # GLib-DEBUG: setenv()/putenv() are not thread-safe and should not be used after threads are created >> ==1024371==WARNING: ASan doesn't fully support makecontext/swapcontext functions and may produce false positives in some cases! >> # set_protocol_features: 0x200 >> # set_owner: start of session >> # vhost-user: un-handled message: 14 >> # vhost-user: un-handled message: 14 >> # set_vring_num: 0/1024 >> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. >> qemu-system-arm: vhost VQ 0 ring restore failed: -22: Invalid argument (22) >> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. >> qemu-system-arm: vhost VQ 1 ring restore failed: -22: Invalid argument (22) >> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. >> qemu-system-arm: vhost_set_vring_call failed: Invalid argument (22) >> qemu-system-arm: Failed to set msg fds. >> qemu-system-arm: vhost_set_vring_call failed: Invalid argument (22) >> ok 1 /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/vhost-user-gpio-device/vhost-user-gpio/vhost-user-gpio-tests/read-guest-mem/memfile/subprocess # SKIP No memory at address 0x0 >> # End of memfile tests >> # End of read-guest-mem tests >> # End of vhost-user-gpio-tests tests >> # End of vhost-user-gpio tests >> # End of vhost-user-gpio-device tests >> # End of virtio-bus tests >> # End of virtio-mmio tests >> # End of virt tests >> # End of arm tests >> 1..1 >> >> ================================================================= >> ==1024371==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks >> >> Direct leak of 240 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: >> #0 0x561d9a5d7a18 in __interceptor_calloc (/home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/qemu-system-arm+0x1d1fa18) (BuildId: 0bdc7c2ada2277089db16d57f17c314e9e53e41c) >> #1 0x7f46ee656c40 in g_malloc0 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5ec40) (BuildId: 0ab0b740e34eeb0c84656ba53737f4c440dfbed4) >> #2 0x561d9bf7875b in virtio_device_realize /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../hw/virtio/virtio.c:4175:9 >> #3 0x561d9c321bf4 in device_set_realized /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../hw/core/qdev.c:566:13 >> #4 0x561d9c33dda8 in property_set_bool /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/object.c:2285:5 >> #5 0x561d9c338fb3 in object_property_set /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/object.c:1420:5 >> #6 0x561d9c344c7c in object_property_set_qobject /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../qom/qom-qobject.c:28:10 >> #7 0x561d9b367954 in qdev_device_add /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/qdev-monitor.c:733:11 >> #8 0x561d9b36f832 in qemu_create_cli_devices /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:2536:5 >> #9 0x561d9b36f832 in qmp_x_exit_preconfig /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:2604:5 >> #10 0x561d9b37613f in qemu_init /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/vl.c:3601:9 >> #11 0x561d9a6125a5 in main /home/alex.bennee/lsrc/qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers/../../softmmu/main.c:47:5 >> >> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 240 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s). >> ../../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:179: kill_qemu() tried to terminate QEMU process but encountered exit status 1 (expected 0) >> fish: Job 1, 'env QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-sy…' terminated by signal SIGABRT (Abort) >> 🕙22:26:18 alex.bennee@hackbox2:qemu.git/builds/all.clang-sanitizers on for-7.2/virtio-fixes [$?] [⚡ IOT] >> ✗ > > > ok ... was gpio always like this? from 1st commit? if not bisect? <snip> I'm almost tempted to drop the mmio variant of the gpio test. I suspect there is a reason the only other mmio vhost-user test is for virtio-net.