Message ID | 20221228084028.46528-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Qcom: LLCC/EDAC: Fix base address used for LLCC banks | expand |
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 06:55:47PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:17:11PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > Well, some maintainers prefer to pick the independent patches through their > > tree. That's why I moved those patches to the start of the series. > > Once some maintainers experience a crazy dependency hell between trees, > they would find routing it all through a single tree a lot easier the > next time. > > > If you are fine with all patches going through qcom tree, I do not > > have any issue :) > > I'm reviewing. > Ok! I'll wait for your reviews on the rest of the EDAC patches before doing the respin. Thanks, Mani > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 11:00:45PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 06:55:47PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:17:11PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > > Well, some maintainers prefer to pick the independent patches through their > > > tree. That's why I moved those patches to the start of the series. > > > > Once some maintainers experience a crazy dependency hell between trees, > > they would find routing it all through a single tree a lot easier the > > next time. > > > > > If you are fine with all patches going through qcom tree, I do not > > > have any issue :) > > > > I'm reviewing. > > > > Ok! I'll wait for your reviews on the rest of the EDAC patches before doing the > respin. > Ping! Thanks, Mani > Thanks, > Mani > > > -- > > Regards/Gruss, > > Boris. > > > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette > > -- > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 02:10:26PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > The Qualcomm LLCC/EDAC drivers were using a fixed register stride for > accessing the (Control and Status Registers) CSRs of each LLCC bank. > This stride only works for some SoCs like SDM845 for which driver > support was initially added. > > But the later SoCs use different register stride that vary between the > banks with holes in-between. So it is not possible to use a single register > stride for accessing the CSRs of each bank. By doing so could result in a > crash. If this patch fixes a crash, then it should be Cc: <stable@kernel.org> If there are prerequisites to it, they should be CC:stable too. So looking at the urgent stuff: patches 1, 3, I'm thinking I can take them through the EDAC tree and send them to Linus now, after you've addressed the review comments. This one can go through some other tree, I presume, but since it fixes a crash it should go in now too... > For fixing this issue, let's obtain the base address of each LLCC bank from > devicetree and get rid of the fixed stride. This also means, we no longer Please use passive voice in your commit message: no "we" or "I", etc, and describe your changes in imperative mood. Personal pronouns are ambiguous in text, especially with so many parties/companies/etc developing the kernel so let's avoid them please. > need to rely on reg-names property and get the base addresses using index. > > First index is LLCC bank 0 and last index is LLCC broadcast. If the SoC > supports more than one bank, then those needs to be defined in devicetree s/needs/need/ > for index from 1..N-1. > > Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <quic_ppareek@quicinc.com> > Tested-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org> # Thinkpad X13s > Tested-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com> # sa8540p-ride > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> With the above addressed, for the EDAC bits: Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Thx.
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 02:27:50PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 02:10:26PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > The Qualcomm LLCC/EDAC drivers were using a fixed register stride for > > accessing the (Control and Status Registers) CSRs of each LLCC bank. > > This stride only works for some SoCs like SDM845 for which driver > > support was initially added. > > > > But the later SoCs use different register stride that vary between the > > banks with holes in-between. So it is not possible to use a single register > > stride for accessing the CSRs of each bank. By doing so could result in a > > crash. > > If this patch fixes a crash, then it should be > > Cc: <stable@kernel.org> > > If there are prerequisites to it, they should be CC:stable too. > That's what I did in previous revision but then Krzysztof reported that backporting would break old DTs. See discussion on v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221212123311.146261-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org/ Thanks, Mani > So looking at the urgent stuff: patches 1, 3, I'm thinking I can take them > through the EDAC tree and send them to Linus now, after you've addressed the > review comments. > > This one can go through some other tree, I presume, but since it fixes a crash > it should go in now too... > > > For fixing this issue, let's obtain the base address of each LLCC bank from > > devicetree and get rid of the fixed stride. This also means, we no longer > > Please use passive voice in your commit message: no "we" or "I", etc, > and describe your changes in imperative mood. > > Personal pronouns are ambiguous in text, especially with so many > parties/companies/etc developing the kernel so let's avoid them please. > > > need to rely on reg-names property and get the base addresses using index. > > > > First index is LLCC bank 0 and last index is LLCC broadcast. If the SoC > > supports more than one bank, then those needs to be defined in devicetree > > s/needs/need/ > > > for index from 1..N-1. > > > > Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <quic_ppareek@quicinc.com> > > Tested-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > > Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org> # Thinkpad X13s > > Tested-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com> # sa8540p-ride > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> > > With the above addressed, for the EDAC bits: > > Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> > > Thx. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette