Message ID | 20230711125726.3509391-1-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | PCI: Define Intel PCI IDs and use them in drivers | expand |
On 7/11/2023 4:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 02:57:25PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote: >> Use PCI device IDs from pci_ids.h header and while at it change to using >> PCI_DEVICE_DATA() macro, to simplify declarations. > > FWIW, > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > Oh, additional remark below. > >> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> >> Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-apl.c | 9 +++---- >> sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-cnl.c | 15 ++++-------- >> sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-icl.c | 12 ++++------ >> sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-mtl.c | 3 +-- >> sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-skl.c | 6 ++--- >> sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c | 45 ++++++++++++----------------------- >> sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tng.c | 3 +-- >> 7 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-apl.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-apl.c >> index 69cad5a6bc72..083659ddfe6b 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-apl.c >> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-apl.c >> @@ -85,12 +85,9 @@ static const struct sof_dev_desc glk_desc = { >> >> /* PCI IDs */ >> static const struct pci_device_id sof_pci_ids[] = { >> - { PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x5a98), /* BXT-P (ApolloLake) */ >> - .driver_data = (unsigned long)&bxt_desc}, >> - { PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x1a98),/* BXT-T */ >> - .driver_data = (unsigned long)&bxt_desc}, >> - { PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x3198), /* GeminiLake */ >> - .driver_data = (unsigned long)&glk_desc}, >> + { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_APL, &bxt_desc) }, >> + { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_APL_T, &bxt_desc) }, > > Have we ever had APL-T? What is that? I remember that we have had two or > three BXTs inside, and then products become for Broxton and Apollo Lake > SoC codenames. I never have heard about -T... > I've talked a bit with Cezary and it seems that 0x1a98 is BXT-M (not -T) and it's an RVP, BXT-M B0 to be specific. From what we know no BXT is available on market. Perhaps we can just remove it?