Message ID | 20230824021249.271946-1-li.meng@amd.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | AMD Pstate Preferred Core | expand |
On 24 Aug 10:12, Meng Li wrote: > Add support for getting the highest performance to the > generic CPPC driver. This enables downstream drivers > such as amd-pstate to discover and use these values. > > Please refer to the ACPI_Spec for details on continuous > performance control of CPPC. > > Signed-off-by: Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com> > Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> > Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/08_Processor_Configuration_and_Control.html?highlight=cppc#cpc-continuous-performance-control > --- > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > index 7ff269a78c20..ad388a0e8484 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > @@ -1154,6 +1154,19 @@ int cppc_get_nominal_perf(int cpunum, u64 *nominal_perf) > return cppc_get_perf(cpunum, NOMINAL_PERF, nominal_perf); > } > > +/** > + * cppc_get_highest_perf - Get the highest performance register value. > + * @cpunum: CPU from which to get highest performance. > + * @highest_perf: Return address. > + * > + * Return: 0 for success, -EIO otherwise. > + */ > +int cppc_get_highest_perf(int cpunum, u64 *highest_perf) > +{ > + return cppc_get_perf(cpunum, HIGHEST_PERF, highest_perf); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_get_highest_perf); > + > /** > * cppc_get_epp_perf - Get the epp register value. > * @cpunum: CPU from which to get epp preference value. > diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h > index 6126c977ece0..c0b69ffe7bdb 100644 > --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h > +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h > @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ struct cppc_cpudata { > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB > extern int cppc_get_desired_perf(int cpunum, u64 *desired_perf); > extern int cppc_get_nominal_perf(int cpunum, u64 *nominal_perf); > +extern int cppc_get_highest_perf(int cpunum, u64 *highest_perf); > extern int cppc_get_perf_ctrs(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *perf_fb_ctrs); > extern int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls); > extern int cppc_set_enable(int cpu, bool enable); > @@ -165,6 +166,10 @@ static inline int cppc_get_nominal_perf(int cpunum, u64 *nominal_perf) > { > return -ENOTSUPP; > } > +static inline int cppc_get_highest_perf(int cpunum, u64 *highest_perf) > +{ > + return -ENOTSUPP; > +} > static inline int cppc_get_perf_ctrs(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *perf_fb_ctrs) > { > return -ENOTSUPP; > -- > 2.34.1 >
On 24 Aug 10:12, Meng Li wrote: > Preferred core rankings can be changed dynamically by the > platform based on the workload and platform conditions and > accounting for thermals and aging. > When this occurs, cpu priority need to be set. > > Signed-off-by: Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > index d02305675f66..8a8e4ecb1b5c 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c > @@ -315,6 +315,7 @@ static int pstate_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata) > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf, AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(cap1)); > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf, AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(cap1)); > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf, AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1)); > + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_highest_perf, AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1)); > > return 0; > } > @@ -336,6 +337,7 @@ static int cppc_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata) > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf, > cppc_perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf); > WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf, cppc_perf.lowest_perf); > + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_highest_perf, cppc_perf.highest_perf); > > if (cppc_state == AMD_PSTATE_ACTIVE) > return 0; > @@ -744,6 +746,34 @@ static void amd_pstate_init_prefcore(void) > schedule_work(&sched_prefcore_work); > } > > +static void amd_pstate_update_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu) > +{ > + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; > + struct amd_cpudata *cpudata; > + u32 prev_high = 0, cur_high = 0; > + u64 highest_perf; > + int ret; > + > + if (!prefcore) > + return; > + > + ret = amd_pstate_get_highest_perf(cpu, &highest_perf); > + if (ret) > + return; > + > + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); > + cpudata = policy->driver_data; > + cur_high = highest_perf; > + prev_high = READ_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_highest_perf); > + > + if (prev_high != cur_high) { > + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_highest_perf, cur_high); > + sched_set_itmt_core_prio(cur_high, cpu); > + } > + > + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); > +} > + > static int amd_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > { > int min_freq, max_freq, nominal_freq, lowest_nonlinear_freq, ret; > @@ -1468,6 +1498,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_driver = { > .suspend = amd_pstate_cpu_suspend, > .resume = amd_pstate_cpu_resume, > .set_boost = amd_pstate_set_boost, > + .update_highest_perf = amd_pstate_update_highest_perf, > .name = "amd-pstate", > .attr = amd_pstate_attr, > }; > @@ -1482,6 +1513,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_epp_driver = { > .online = amd_pstate_epp_cpu_online, > .suspend = amd_pstate_epp_suspend, > .resume = amd_pstate_epp_resume, > + .update_highest_perf = amd_pstate_update_highest_perf, > .name = "amd-pstate-epp", > .attr = amd_pstate_epp_attr, If we intend to use the existing `update_limits` callback then this patch needed to update. Otherwise looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> > }; > diff --git a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h > index 446394f84606..fa86bc953d3e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h > +++ b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h > @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct amd_cpudata { > u32 nominal_perf; > u32 lowest_nonlinear_perf; > u32 lowest_perf; > + u32 prefcore_highest_perf; > > u32 max_freq; > u32 min_freq; > -- > 2.34.1 >