| Message ID | 20231006120159.3413789-3-bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add sc8280xp CCI and CAMSS core dtsi | expand |
On 6.10.2023 14:01, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > Add sc8280xp compatible with cci_v2_data parameters. > > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> > --- Drop this patch, it adds nothing useful Konrad
Hi Konrad, > > Add sc8280xp compatible with cci_v2_data parameters. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> > > --- > Drop this patch, it adds nothing useful what about the rest of the series? Could you please be a bit more explicative? Thanks, Andi
On 08/10/2023 22:28, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Konrad, > >>> Add sc8280xp compatible with cci_v2_data parameters. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> >>> --- >> Drop this patch, it adds nothing useful > > what about the rest of the series? > > Could you please be a bit more explicative? > > Thanks, > Andi I think he means I can use the sm8250 or sm8450 compat string, which is true. --- bod
On 08/10/2023 23:13, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 08/10/2023 22:28, Andi Shyti wrote: >> Hi Konrad, >> >>>> Add sc8280xp compatible with cci_v2_data parameters. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> >>>> --- >>> Drop this patch, it adds nothing useful >> >> what about the rest of the series? >> >> Could you please be a bit more explicative? >> >> Thanks, >> Andi > > I think he means I can use the sm8250 or sm8450 compat string, which is > true. > > --- > bod Tested, compat sm8250 works fine. --- bod
On 8.10.2023 23:28, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Konrad, > >>> Add sc8280xp compatible with cci_v2_data parameters. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> >>> --- >> Drop this patch, it adds nothing useful > > what about the rest of the series? > > Could you please be a bit more explicative? This patch introduces a new compatible in the driver that does exactly nothing, as the bindings require the use of "qcom,sc8280xp-cci" with a fallback of "qcom,msm8996-cci". The latter one already has a match table entry. Konrad
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c index 414882c57d7f..677e4bc6e2c5 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c @@ -819,6 +819,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id cci_dt_match[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,msm8916-cci", .data = &cci_v1_data}, { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-cci", .data = &cci_v2_data}, { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-cci", .data = &cci_v2_data}, + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-cci", .data = &cci_v2_data}, { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-cci", .data = &cci_v2_data}, {} };
Add sc8280xp compatible with cci_v2_data parameters. Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)