Message ID | 20240109120738.346061-1-masahiroy@kernel.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | kbuild: create a list of DTBs and allow to install base dtb and overlays | expand |
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:07:37PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Commit 15d16d6dadf6 ("kbuild: Add generic rule to apply fdtoverlay") > introduced the -dtbs syntax to apply overlays during the build process. > > However, scripts/Makefile.dtbinst is not aware of the -dtbs syntax, > so 'make dtbs_install' installs the files directly added to dtb-y. > (Presumably, it was intentional.) Yes. The intent was the Makefile should define what's installed or not. There's 2 reasons to apply overlays in the build. The first is so a DTB can be refactored into a base plus overlay(s) and we keep the original full DTB. The second is to test that overlays actually apply because testing that at boot time in bootloader is a poor experience and we don't want overlays which don't apply to upstream DTs. Whatever targets you want installed put in dtb-y. Whatever targets are just for testing, put in dtb-. The latter are then enabled with CONFIG_OF_ALL_DTBS. > For example, consider this case: > > foo1-dtbs := foo_base.dtb foo_overlay1.dtbo > foo2-dtbs := foo_base.dtb foo_overlay2.dtbo > dtb-y := foo1.dtb foo2.dtb > > 'make dtbs_install' only installs foo1.dtb and foo2.dtb. It is suitable > when the boot image supports a single hardware configuration, or when > the boot loader in use does not support applying overlays. > > However, when creating a boot image with multiple board supports, it > wastes storage space, as foo1.dtb and foo2.dtb have foo_base.dtb in > common. > > From a space perspective, a more optimal solution is to install > foo_base.dtb, foo_overlay1.dtbo, and foo_overlay2.dtbo, then assemble > the final dtb (either foo1.dtb or foo2.dtb) on the boot loader. > > This commit adds a new flag, INSTALL_DTBS_PRIMITIVE. > > With INSTALL_DTBS_PRIMITIVE=1, 'make dtbs_install' will install primitive > files (such as foo_base.dtb, foo_overlay1.dtbo, and foo_overlay2.dtbo in > this case). And not install foo1.dtb and foo2.dtb, right? What if one wants to install everything? Seems like this needs to be a 3-way option. I'm not really convinced we need this in the first place though. > > Without INSTALL_DTBS_PRIMITIVE, the current behavior is maintained > (foo1.dtb and foo2.dtb will be installed in this case).