| Message ID | 20240308224450.2327415-1-saravanak@google.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | d61120b4623e24e863a455c1e11085fcb7653d08 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Documentation: power: Fix typo in suspend and interrupts doc | expand |
On Mar 08, 2024 at 14:44:50 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote: > Typos are bad. Fix them. Maybe a little more description that you s/by/but would've also made things more clear? > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> > --- > Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst b/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst > index dfbace2f4600..f588feeecad0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst > +++ b/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ handling the given IRQ as a system wakeup interrupt line and disable_irq_wake() > turns that logic off. > > Calling enable_irq_wake() causes suspend_device_irqs() to treat the given IRQ > -in a special way. Namely, the IRQ remains enabled, by on the first interrupt > +in a special way. Namely, the IRQ remains enabled, but on the first interrupt > it will be disabled, marked as pending and "suspended" so that it will be > re-enabled by resume_device_irqs() during the subsequent system resume. Also > the PM core is notified about the event which causes the system suspend in > -- Anyway, changes LGTM! Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 11:45 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > Typos are bad. Fix them. > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> > --- > Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst b/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst > index dfbace2f4600..f588feeecad0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst > +++ b/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ handling the given IRQ as a system wakeup interrupt line and disable_irq_wake() > turns that logic off. > > Calling enable_irq_wake() causes suspend_device_irqs() to treat the given IRQ > -in a special way. Namely, the IRQ remains enabled, by on the first interrupt > +in a special way. Namely, the IRQ remains enabled, but on the first interrupt > it will be disabled, marked as pending and "suspended" so that it will be > re-enabled by resume_device_irqs() during the subsequent system resume. Also > the PM core is notified about the event which causes the system suspend in > -- Applied as 6.9-rc material, thanks!
diff --git a/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst b/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst index dfbace2f4600..f588feeecad0 100644 --- a/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst +++ b/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ handling the given IRQ as a system wakeup interrupt line and disable_irq_wake() turns that logic off. Calling enable_irq_wake() causes suspend_device_irqs() to treat the given IRQ -in a special way. Namely, the IRQ remains enabled, by on the first interrupt +in a special way. Namely, the IRQ remains enabled, but on the first interrupt it will be disabled, marked as pending and "suspended" so that it will be re-enabled by resume_device_irqs() during the subsequent system resume. Also the PM core is notified about the event which causes the system suspend in
Typos are bad. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> --- Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)