| Message ID | 20240918084132.928295-3-andreas@kemnade.info |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | power: supply: twl6030/32 charger | expand |
Am Wed, 18 Sep 2024 12:47:22 +0200 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>: > On 18/09/2024 10:41, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > Also the TWL603X devices have a charger, so allow to specify it > > here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml | 18 > > ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml index > > e94b0fd7af0f8..4064a228cb0fc 100644 --- > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml +++ > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml @@ -105,6 > > +105,11 @@ allOf: regulator-initial-mode: false > > > > properties: > > + bci: > > charger > > > + type: object > > additionalProperties: true > > Each node must end with additionalProperties or unevaluated. I think > you never tested it, because dtschema reports this. > I did run it, no complaints: andi@aktux:~/kernel$ touch Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml andi@aktux:~/kernel$ touch Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/ti,twl6030-charger.yaml andi@aktux:~/kernel$ make ARCH=arm dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=twl SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json /home/andi/kernel/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml: mac-mode: missing type definition CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings DTC [C] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/twl4030-charger.example.dtb DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/ti,twl6030-charger.example.dts DTC [C] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/ti,twl6030-charger.example.dtb DTC [C] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/ti,twl6030-gpadc.example.dtb DTC [C] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/ti,twl4030-madc.example.dtb DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.example.dts DTC [C] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.example.dtb andi@aktux:~/kernel$ Regards, Andreas
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 12:47:22PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 18/09/2024 10:41, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > Also the TWL603X devices have a charger, so allow to specify it here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml > > index e94b0fd7af0f8..4064a228cb0fc 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml > > @@ -105,6 +105,11 @@ allOf: > > regulator-initial-mode: false > > > > properties: > > + bci: > > charger > > > + type: object > > additionalProperties: true > > Each node must end with additionalProperties or unevaluated. I think you > never tested it, because dtschema reports this. This is under an if/then schema is why there's no errors. This schema probably should have been 3 with a ti,twl-common.yaml schema for the common properties, but I'm not sure it is worth changing now. Rob
Am Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:51:25 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 12:47:22PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 18/09/2024 10:41, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > Also the TWL603X devices have a charger, so allow to specify it > > > here. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml | 18 > > > ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml index > > > e94b0fd7af0f8..4064a228cb0fc 100644 --- > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml +++ > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml @@ -105,6 > > > +105,11 @@ allOf: regulator-initial-mode: false > > > > > > properties: > > > + bci: > > > > charger > > > > > + type: object > > > > additionalProperties: true > > Thinking again. Why additionalProperties? unevaluatedProperties looks more reasonable for me. There are additional properties but they should be evaluated by another schema. > > Each node must end with additionalProperties or unevaluated. I > > think you never tested it, because dtschema reports this. > > This is under an if/then schema is why there's no errors. > and then it just accepts anything with compatible twl6032-charger e.g. and does not care about anything in patch 2, because it has a different compatible. > This schema probably should have been 3 with a ti,twl-common.yaml > schema for the common properties, but I'm not sure it is worth > changing now. > Or a ti,twl4030.yaml and a ti,twl603X.yaml. 6030 and 6032 have more in common than the 4030. I would propose that is something for the next more final cleaning up/conversion round. First I would like to avoid having drained batteries because of no charging, so allow for more automated testing and bisecting. I think I will prepare a v2 series on monday. Regards, Andreas
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml index e94b0fd7af0f8..4064a228cb0fc 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml @@ -105,6 +105,11 @@ allOf: regulator-initial-mode: false properties: + bci: + type: object + properties: + compatible: + const: ti,twl6030-charger gpadc: type: object properties: @@ -136,6 +141,13 @@ allOf: regulator-initial-mode: false properties: + bci: + type: object + properties: + compatible: + items: + - const: ti,twl6032-charger + - const: ti,twl6030-charger gpadc: type: object properties: @@ -222,6 +234,12 @@ examples: interrupt-controller; #interrupt-cells = <1>; + bci { + compatible = "ti,twl6030-charger"; + interrupts = <2>, <5>; + monitored-battery = <&bat>; + }; + gpadc { compatible = "ti,twl6030-gpadc"; interrupts = <6>;
Also the TWL603X devices have a charger, so allow to specify it here. Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> --- .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,twl.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)