| Message ID | 20241107032936.2702-1-liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | tty: synclink_gt: Fix incorrect formatted output | expand |
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:29:36AM +0800, liujing wrote: > In the struct slgt_info structure, the type of info->tbuf_current > is unsigned int, so the output format is %u. > > Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com> > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c b/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c > index bd8d92ee7c53..0c51c6c28080 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c > +++ b/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c > @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static void trace_block(struct slgt_info *info, const char *data, int count, con > static void dump_tbufs(struct slgt_info *info) > { > int i; > - printk("tbuf_current=%d\n", info->tbuf_current); > + printk("tbuf_current=%u\n", info->tbuf_current); How was this found? How was it tested? Why is this code still in here at all? It all should be removed and if really needed, converted to use the proper in-kernel apis for this type of thing, not a random module parameter that does not fit in with the rest of the kernel. thanks, greg k-h
diff --git a/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c b/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c index bd8d92ee7c53..0c51c6c28080 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c +++ b/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static void trace_block(struct slgt_info *info, const char *data, int count, con static void dump_tbufs(struct slgt_info *info) { int i; - printk("tbuf_current=%d\n", info->tbuf_current); + printk("tbuf_current=%u\n", info->tbuf_current); for (i=0 ; i < info->tbuf_count ; i++) { printk("%d: count=%04X status=%04X\n", i, le16_to_cpu(info->tbufs[i].count), le16_to_cpu(info->tbufs[i].status));
In the struct slgt_info structure, the type of info->tbuf_current is unsigned int, so the output format is %u. Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>