| Message ID | 57a8d38a-6299-4d2c-bb2e-c9d1e3bf1c99@stanley.mountain |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | kunit: skb: use "gfp" variable instead of hardcoding GFP_KERNEL | expand |
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 01:16, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote: > > The intent here was clearly to use the gfp variable flags instead of > hardcoding GFP_KERNEL. All the callers pass GFP_KERNEL as the gfp > flags so this doesn't affect runtime. > > Fixes: b3231d353a51 ("kunit: add a convenience allocation wrapper for SKBs") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>\ > --- Nice catch, thanks. Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Cheers, -- David > include/kunit/skbuff.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/kunit/skbuff.h b/include/kunit/skbuff.h > index 44d12370939a..345e1e8f0312 100644 > --- a/include/kunit/skbuff.h > +++ b/include/kunit/skbuff.h > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static void kunit_action_kfree_skb(void *p) > static inline struct sk_buff *kunit_zalloc_skb(struct kunit *test, int len, > gfp_t gfp) > { > - struct sk_buff *res = alloc_skb(len, GFP_KERNEL); > + struct sk_buff *res = alloc_skb(len, gfp); > > if (!res || skb_pad(res, len)) > return NULL; > -- > 2.45.2 >
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 08:16:30PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The intent here was clearly to use the gfp variable flags instead of > hardcoding GFP_KERNEL. All the callers pass GFP_KERNEL as the gfp > flags so this doesn't affect runtime. > > Fixes: b3231d353a51 ("kunit: add a convenience allocation wrapper for SKBs") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> The kernel doc comment for kunit_zalloc_skb() is missing a mention of the gfp parameter. Additionally, the comment says "Allocate a new struct sk_buff with GFP_KERNEL," which should replace GFP_KERNEL with @gfp. It might be better to fix both issues in the comment together. With the above corrections: Reviewed-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com> Regards, Kuan-Wei > --- > include/kunit/skbuff.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/kunit/skbuff.h b/include/kunit/skbuff.h > index 44d12370939a..345e1e8f0312 100644 > --- a/include/kunit/skbuff.h > +++ b/include/kunit/skbuff.h > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static void kunit_action_kfree_skb(void *p) > static inline struct sk_buff *kunit_zalloc_skb(struct kunit *test, int len, > gfp_t gfp) > { > - struct sk_buff *res = alloc_skb(len, GFP_KERNEL); > + struct sk_buff *res = alloc_skb(len, gfp); > > if (!res || skb_pad(res, len)) > return NULL; > -- > 2.45.2 > >
diff --git a/include/kunit/skbuff.h b/include/kunit/skbuff.h index 44d12370939a..345e1e8f0312 100644 --- a/include/kunit/skbuff.h +++ b/include/kunit/skbuff.h @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static void kunit_action_kfree_skb(void *p) static inline struct sk_buff *kunit_zalloc_skb(struct kunit *test, int len, gfp_t gfp) { - struct sk_buff *res = alloc_skb(len, GFP_KERNEL); + struct sk_buff *res = alloc_skb(len, gfp); if (!res || skb_pad(res, len)) return NULL;
The intent here was clearly to use the gfp variable flags instead of hardcoding GFP_KERNEL. All the callers pass GFP_KERNEL as the gfp flags so this doesn't affect runtime. Fixes: b3231d353a51 ("kunit: add a convenience allocation wrapper for SKBs") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> --- include/kunit/skbuff.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)