Message ID | 20250409194804.3773260-1-quic_wcheng@quicinc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Introduce QC USB SND audio offloading support | expand |
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:47:33PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> Requesting to see if we can get some Acked-By tags, and merge on usb-next.
let me give it some 0-day bot testing to see how that goes...
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:47:33PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote: > Requesting to see if we can get some Acked-By tags, and merge on usb-next. Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> I have been keeping an eye on this as it's been going past but never managed to find the time and sit down to review the whole thing en masse - what I've been looking at looks OK, I just didn't look through the whole series as a full piece.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:11:42AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:47:33PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote: > > Requesting to see if we can get some Acked-By tags, and merge on usb-next. > > let me give it some 0-day bot testing to see how that goes... All looks good, so let me go apply this to my usb-next branch now. Thanks for sticking with this, I think it deserves the "most versions ever" of a patch series award. greg k-h
Hi Greg, On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 01:04:37PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:11:42AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:47:33PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote: > > > Requesting to see if we can get some Acked-By tags, and merge on usb-next. > > > > let me give it some 0-day bot testing to see how that goes... > > All looks good, so let me go apply this to my usb-next branch now. > > Thanks for sticking with this, I think it deserves the "most versions ever" > of a patch series award. > I have honestly no intention of blocking this series any longer, but the comments I raised on PATCH 26/31 are likely valid and suggest the series wasn't fully tested on v38. So I would personally prefer to get fixes and confirmation on that from Wesley and then merge v39. It doesn't feel like the kind of thing to fix incrementally on top, since the commit message is also misleading now. Thanks, Stephan
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 02:40:15PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 01:04:37PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:11:42AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:47:33PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote: > > > > Requesting to see if we can get some Acked-By tags, and merge on usb-next. > > > > > > let me give it some 0-day bot testing to see how that goes... > > > > All looks good, so let me go apply this to my usb-next branch now. > > > > Thanks for sticking with this, I think it deserves the "most versions ever" > > of a patch series award. > > > > I have honestly no intention of blocking this series any longer, but the > comments I raised on PATCH 26/31 are likely valid and suggest the series > wasn't fully tested on v38. So I would personally prefer to get fixes > and confirmation on that from Wesley and then merge v39. It doesn't feel > like the kind of thing to fix incrementally on top, since the commit > message is also misleading now. I think a fixup is probably sufficient, especially as I can't rebase my tree, and reverting all of these is just a mess. thanks, greg k-h
Hi Greg, On 4/11/2025 5:54 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 02:40:15PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 01:04:37PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:11:42AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:47:33PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote: >>>>> Requesting to see if we can get some Acked-By tags, and merge on usb-next. >>>> >>>> let me give it some 0-day bot testing to see how that goes... >>> >>> All looks good, so let me go apply this to my usb-next branch now. >>> >>> Thanks for sticking with this, I think it deserves the "most versions ever" >>> of a patch series award. >>> >> >> I have honestly no intention of blocking this series any longer, but the >> comments I raised on PATCH 26/31 are likely valid and suggest the series >> wasn't fully tested on v38. So I would personally prefer to get fixes >> and confirmation on that from Wesley and then merge v39. It doesn't feel >> like the kind of thing to fix incrementally on top, since the commit >> message is also misleading now. > > I think a fixup is probably sufficient, especially as I can't rebase my > tree, and reverting all of these is just a mess. > Sure I will submit a fix up today. Thanks Greg, Stephan for the feedback and help with the overall progress of the series. Thanks Wesley Cheng