Message ID | 20250515162722.6933-1-quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Refactor ufs phy powerup sequence | expand |
Hi Nitin! > Nitin Rawat (11): > scsi: ufs: qcom: add a new phy calibrate API call > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_enable and qmp_ufs_power_on > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor UFS PHY reset > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_com_init() > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_power_off > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_exit() and Inline qmp_ufs_com_exit() > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: refactor qmp_ufs_power_off > scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls > scsi: ufs: qcom : Introduce phy_power_on/off wrapper function > scsi: ufs: qcom: Prevent calling phy_exit before phy_init What is your intent wrt. getting this series merged? Can the phy: and scsi: patches be merged independently?
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 09:45:40PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Hi Nitin! > > > Nitin Rawat (11): > > scsi: ufs: qcom: add a new phy calibrate API call > > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_enable and qmp_ufs_power_on > > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks > > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor UFS PHY reset > > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_com_init() > > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_power_off > > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_exit() and Inline qmp_ufs_com_exit() > > phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: refactor qmp_ufs_power_off > > scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls > > scsi: ufs: qcom : Introduce phy_power_on/off wrapper function > > scsi: ufs: qcom: Prevent calling phy_exit before phy_init > > What is your intent wrt. getting this series merged? Can the phy: and > scsi: patches be merged independently? Unfortunately PHY patches depend on the first scsi patch.