@@ -125,6 +125,13 @@ static inline bool timespec_valid(const struct timespec *ts)
/* Can't have more nanoseconds then a second */
if ((unsigned long)ts->tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
+static inline bool timespec_valid_strict(const struct timespec *ts)
+{
+ if (!timespec_valid(ts))
+ return false;
/* Disallow values that could overflow ktime_t */
if ((unsigned long long)ts->tv_sec >= KTIME_SEC_MAX)
return false;
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ int do_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv)
struct timespec ts_delta;
unsigned long flags;
- if (!timespec_valid(tv))
+ if (!timespec_valid_strict(tv))
return -EINVAL;
write_seqlock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags);
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct timespec *ts)
timekeeping_forward_now();
tmp = timespec_add(xtime, *ts);
- if (!timespec_valid(&tmp)) {
+ if (!timespec_valid_strict(&tmp)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto error;
}
@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
struct timespec now, boot;
read_persistent_clock(&now);
- if (!timespec_valid(&now)) {
+ if (!timespec_valid_strict(&now)) {
pr_warn("WARNING: Persistent clock returned invalid value!\n"
" Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n");
now.tv_sec = 0;
@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
}
read_boot_clock(&boot);
- if (!timespec_valid(&boot)) {
+ if (!timespec_valid_strict(&boot)) {
pr_warn("WARNING: Boot clock returned invalid value!\n"
" Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n");
boot.tv_sec = 0;
@@ -649,6 +649,12 @@ static void update_sleep_time(struct timespec t)
*/
static void __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(struct timespec *delta)
{
+ if (!timespec_valid_strict(delta)) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime: Invalid "
+ "sleep delta value!\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
xtime = timespec_add(xtime, *delta);
wall_to_monotonic = timespec_sub(wall_to_monotonic, *delta);
update_sleep_time(timespec_add(total_sleep_time, *delta));
This is a -stable backport of cee58483cf56e0ba355fdd97ff5e8925329aa936 Andreas Bombe reported that the added ktime_t overflow checking added to timespec_valid in commit 4e8b14526ca7 ("time: Improve sanity checking of timekeeping inputs") was causing problems with X.org because it caused timeouts larger then KTIME_T to be invalid. Previously, these large timeouts would be clamped to KTIME_MAX and would never expire, which is valid. This patch splits the ktime_t overflow checking into a new timespec_valid_strict function, and converts the timekeeping codes internal checking to use this more strict function. Reported-and-tested-by: Andreas Bombe <aeb@debian.org> Cc: Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> --- include/linux/time.h | 7 +++++++ kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)