| Message ID | 1507014669-1502-5-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | PM / Sleep / ACPI: Some cleanups and clarifications | expand |
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: > Move the code which is special to ACPI LPSS into separate functions. This > may clarify the code a bit, but the main purpose of this change, is instead > to prepare for additional changes on top. Ideally the following changes > should then become easier to review. I'm not sure what changes this is talking about. I have the device flags patches in the works, but I don't think they will need this ATM. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 6 October 2017 at 14:59, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: >> Move the code which is special to ACPI LPSS into separate functions. This >> may clarify the code a bit, but the main purpose of this change, is instead >> to prepare for additional changes on top. Ideally the following changes >> should then become easier to review. > > I'm not sure what changes this is talking about. Right, I forgot to update the changelog. > > I have the device flags patches in the works, but I don't think they > will need this ATM. Okay, then let's just ignore this one. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c index 0c84d15..e726173 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c @@ -717,22 +717,28 @@ static void acpi_lpss_dismiss(struct device *dev) } #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP -static int acpi_lpss_suspend_late(struct device *dev) +static int lpss_suspend_late(struct device *dev) { struct lpss_private_data *pdata = acpi_driver_data(ACPI_COMPANION(dev)); + + if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX) + acpi_lpss_save_ctx(dev, pdata); + + return acpi_dev_suspend_late(dev); +} + +static int acpi_lpss_suspend_late(struct device *dev) +{ int ret; ret = pm_generic_suspend_late(dev); if (ret) return ret; - if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX) - acpi_lpss_save_ctx(dev, pdata); - - return acpi_dev_suspend_late(dev); + return lpss_suspend_late(dev); } -static int acpi_lpss_resume_early(struct device *dev) +static int lpss_resume_early(struct device *dev) { struct lpss_private_data *pdata = acpi_driver_data(ACPI_COMPANION(dev)); int ret; @@ -746,6 +752,17 @@ static int acpi_lpss_resume_early(struct device *dev) if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX) acpi_lpss_restore_ctx(dev, pdata); + return 0; +} + +static int acpi_lpss_resume_early(struct device *dev) +{ + int ret; + + ret = lpss_resume_early(dev); + if (ret) + return ret; + return pm_generic_resume_early(dev); } #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
Move the code which is special to ACPI LPSS into separate functions. This may clarify the code a bit, but the main purpose of this change, is instead to prepare for additional changes on top. Ideally the following changes should then become easier to review. Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> --- drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4