diff mbox series

[1/2] xfs: scrub: avoid uninitialized return code

Message ID 20171102111137.3062126-1-arnd@arndb.de
State New
Headers show
Series [1/2] xfs: scrub: avoid uninitialized return code | expand

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann Nov. 2, 2017, 11:11 a.m. UTC
The newly added xfs_scrub_da_btree_block() function has one code path
that returns the 'error' variable without initializing it first, as
shown by this compiler warning:

fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c: In function 'xfs_scrub_da_btree_block':
fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c:462:9: error: 'error' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

Returning -EINVAL might be an appropriate return code in this case.

Fixes: 7c4a07a424c1 ("xfs: scrub directory/attribute btrees")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

---
 fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.9.0

Comments

Brian Foster Nov. 2, 2017, 12:44 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added xfs_scrub_da_btree_block() function has one code path

> that returns the 'error' variable without initializing it first, as

> shown by this compiler warning:

> 

> fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c: In function 'xfs_scrub_da_btree_block':

> fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c:462:9: error: 'error' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

> 

> Returning -EINVAL might be an appropriate return code in this case.

> 

> Fixes: 7c4a07a424c1 ("xfs: scrub directory/attribute btrees")

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

> ---

>  fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c | 4 +++-

>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

> 

> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c

> index 4a93cf1753d3..971566388c9a 100644

> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c

> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c

> @@ -349,8 +349,10 @@ xfs_scrub_da_btree_block(

>  

>  	/* Check the pointer. */

>  	blk->blkno = blkno;

> -	if (!xfs_scrub_da_btree_ptr_ok(ds, level, blkno))

> +	if (!xfs_scrub_da_btree_ptr_ok(ds, level, blkno)) {

> +		error = -EINVAL;

>  		goto out_nobuf;

> +	}


Hmm.. is an error really the right thing to do here vs. setting the
context corrupt and returning 0? (Darrick..?) If the latter, perhaps
error should just be initialized to 0.

Brian

>  

>  	/* Read the buffer. */

>  	error = xfs_da_read_buf(dargs->trans, dargs->dp, blk->blkno, -2,

> -- 

> 2.9.0

> 

> --

> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in

> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Darrick J. Wong Nov. 2, 2017, 4:49 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 08:44:00AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> > The newly added xfs_scrub_da_btree_block() function has one code path

> > that returns the 'error' variable without initializing it first, as

> > shown by this compiler warning:

> > 

> > fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c: In function 'xfs_scrub_da_btree_block':

> > fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c:462:9: error: 'error' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

> > 

> > Returning -EINVAL might be an appropriate return code in this case.

> > 

> > Fixes: 7c4a07a424c1 ("xfs: scrub directory/attribute btrees")

> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

> > ---

> >  fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c | 4 +++-

> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

> > 

> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c

> > index 4a93cf1753d3..971566388c9a 100644

> > --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c

> > +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c

> > @@ -349,8 +349,10 @@ xfs_scrub_da_btree_block(

> >  

> >  	/* Check the pointer. */

> >  	blk->blkno = blkno;

> > -	if (!xfs_scrub_da_btree_ptr_ok(ds, level, blkno))

> > +	if (!xfs_scrub_da_btree_ptr_ok(ds, level, blkno)) {

> > +		error = -EINVAL;

> >  		goto out_nobuf;

> > +	}

> 

> Hmm.. is an error really the right thing to do here vs. setting the

> context corrupt and returning 0? (Darrick..?) If the latter, perhaps

> error should just be initialized to 0.


Yes, zero.  We return from this function with a NULL blks[level]->bp
(and the corrupt flag set) so the caller (xfs_scrub_da_btree) will
return.

--D

> 

> Brian

> 

> >  

> >  	/* Read the buffer. */

> >  	error = xfs_da_read_buf(dargs->trans, dargs->dp, blk->blkno, -2,

> > -- 

> > 2.9.0

> > 

> > --

> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in

> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

> --

> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in

> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c
index 4a93cf1753d3..971566388c9a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c
@@ -349,8 +349,10 @@  xfs_scrub_da_btree_block(
 
 	/* Check the pointer. */
 	blk->blkno = blkno;
-	if (!xfs_scrub_da_btree_ptr_ok(ds, level, blkno))
+	if (!xfs_scrub_da_btree_ptr_ok(ds, level, blkno)) {
+		error = -EINVAL;
 		goto out_nobuf;
+	}
 
 	/* Read the buffer. */
 	error = xfs_da_read_buf(dargs->trans, dargs->dp, blk->blkno, -2,