@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ out:
void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node)
{
unsigned int *m;
- int align = max(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN);
+ int align = max_t(size_t, ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN);
void *ret;
gfp &= gfp_allowed_mask;
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ void kfree(const void *block)
sp = virt_to_page(block);
if (PageSlab(sp)) {
- int align = max(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN);
+ int align = max_t(size_t, ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN);
unsigned int *m = (unsigned int *)(block - align);
slob_free(m, *m + align);
} else
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ size_t ksize(const void *block)
sp = virt_to_page(block);
if (PageSlab(sp)) {
- int align = max(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN);
+ int align = max_t(size_t, ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN);
unsigned int *m = (unsigned int *)(block - align);
return SLOB_UNITS(*m) * SLOB_UNIT;
} else
The definition of ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN is architecture dependent and can be either of type size_t or int. Comparing that value with ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN can cause harmless warnings on platforms where they are different. Since both are always small positive integer numbers, using the size_t type to compare them is safe and gets rid of the warning. Without this patch, building ARM collie_defconfig results in: mm/slob.c: In function '__kmalloc_node': mm/slob.c:431:152: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default] mm/slob.c: In function 'kfree': mm/slob.c:484:153: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default] mm/slob.c: In function 'ksize': mm/slob.c:503:153: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default] Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> --- mm/slob.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)