| Message ID | 20180518222737.16006-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 1a2b80ecc7ad374e9ef6a3de6fdd032d94be2270 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] selftests: net: reuseport_bpf_numa: don't fail if no numa support | expand |
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c index 365c32e84189..c9f478b40996 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <numa.h> +#include "../kselftest.h" + static const int PORT = 8888; static void build_rcv_group(int *rcv_fd, size_t len, int family, int proto) @@ -229,7 +231,7 @@ int main(void) int *rcv_fd, nodes; if (numa_available() < 0) - error(1, errno, "no numa api support"); + ksft_exit_skip("no numa api support\n"); nodes = numa_max_node() + 1;
The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support. The test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped. Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id") Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.17.0