diff mbox series

[v2] i2c: mux: arb-gpio: Rewrite to use GPIO descriptors

Message ID 20190601165931.17226-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
State Accepted
Commit d9a183bfd29d44c927b3920ae49ba2f682793976
Headers show
Series [v2] i2c: mux: arb-gpio: Rewrite to use GPIO descriptors | expand

Commit Message

Linus Walleij June 1, 2019, 4:59 p.m. UTC
Instead of complex code picking GPIOs out of the device tree
and keeping track of polarity for each GPIO line, use descriptors
and pull polarity handling into the gpiolib.

We look for "our-claim" and "their-claim" since the gpiolib
code will try e.g. "our-claim-gpios" and "our-claim-gpio" in
turn to locate these GPIO lines from the device tree.

Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

---
ChangeLog v1->v2:
- Print some errors if we fail to obtain GPIOs.
- Switch to devm_gpiod_get_index() and !IS_ERR() on the result
  to check for an unsupported multimaster set-up.
- Especially handle if the second master returns -EPROBE_DEFER
  even in the case of the optional GPIO that we explicitly bail
  out on if found, as it may be a sign that the GPIO controllers
  are not yet up.
---
 drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c | 79 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1

Comments

Marek Szyprowski June 3, 2019, 7:22 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Linus,

On 2019-06-01 18:59, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Instead of complex code picking GPIOs out of the device tree

> and keeping track of polarity for each GPIO line, use descriptors

> and pull polarity handling into the gpiolib.

>

> We look for "our-claim" and "their-claim" since the gpiolib

> code will try e.g. "our-claim-gpios" and "our-claim-gpio" in

> turn to locate these GPIO lines from the device tree.

>

> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>


Samsung Snow Chromebook works fine with linux-next 20190603 and this patch.

Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>


> ---

> ChangeLog v1->v2:

> - Print some errors if we fail to obtain GPIOs.

> - Switch to devm_gpiod_get_index() and !IS_ERR() on the result

>    to check for an unsupported multimaster set-up.

> - Especially handle if the second master returns -EPROBE_DEFER

>    even in the case of the optional GPIO that we explicitly bail

>    out on if found, as it may be a sign that the GPIO controllers

>    are not yet up.

> ---

>   drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c | 79 ++++++++--------------

>   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

>

> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c

> index 812b8cff265f..a664f637bc3d 100644

> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c

> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c

> @@ -15,12 +15,11 @@

>    */

>   

>   #include <linux/delay.h>

> -#include <linux/gpio.h>

> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>

>   #include <linux/kernel.h>

>   #include <linux/i2c.h>

>   #include <linux/i2c-mux.h>

>   #include <linux/module.h>

> -#include <linux/of_gpio.h>

>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>

>   #include <linux/slab.h>

>   

> @@ -28,22 +27,16 @@

>   /**

>    * struct i2c_arbitrator_data - Driver data for I2C arbitrator

>    *

> - * @our_gpio: GPIO we'll use to claim.

> - * @our_gpio_release: 0 if active high; 1 if active low; AKA if the GPIO ==

> - *   this then consider it released.

> - * @their_gpio: GPIO that the other side will use to claim.

> - * @their_gpio_release: 0 if active high; 1 if active low; AKA if the GPIO ==

> - *   this then consider it released.

> + * @our_gpio: GPIO descriptor we'll use to claim.

> + * @their_gpio: GPIO descriptor that the other side will use to claim.

>    * @slew_delay_us: microseconds to wait for a GPIO to go high.

>    * @wait_retry_us: we'll attempt another claim after this many microseconds.

>    * @wait_free_us: we'll give up after this many microseconds.

>    */

>   

>   struct i2c_arbitrator_data {

> -	int our_gpio;

> -	int our_gpio_release;

> -	int their_gpio;

> -	int their_gpio_release;

> +	struct gpio_desc *our_gpio;

> +	struct gpio_desc *their_gpio;

>   	unsigned int slew_delay_us;

>   	unsigned int wait_retry_us;

>   	unsigned int wait_free_us;

> @@ -64,15 +57,15 @@ static int i2c_arbitrator_select(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan)

>   	stop_time = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(arb->wait_free_us) + 1;

>   	do {

>   		/* Indicate that we want to claim the bus */

> -		gpio_set_value(arb->our_gpio, !arb->our_gpio_release);

> +		gpiod_set_value(arb->our_gpio, 1);

>   		udelay(arb->slew_delay_us);

>   

>   		/* Wait for the other master to release it */

>   		stop_retry = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(arb->wait_retry_us) + 1;

>   		while (time_before(jiffies, stop_retry)) {

> -			int gpio_val = !!gpio_get_value(arb->their_gpio);

> +			int gpio_val = gpiod_get_value(arb->their_gpio);

>   

> -			if (gpio_val == arb->their_gpio_release) {

> +			if (!gpio_val) {

>   				/* We got it, so return */

>   				return 0;

>   			}

> @@ -81,13 +74,13 @@ static int i2c_arbitrator_select(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan)

>   		}

>   

>   		/* It didn't release, so give up, wait, and try again */

> -		gpio_set_value(arb->our_gpio, arb->our_gpio_release);

> +		gpiod_set_value(arb->our_gpio, 0);

>   

>   		usleep_range(arb->wait_retry_us, arb->wait_retry_us * 2);

>   	} while (time_before(jiffies, stop_time));

>   

>   	/* Give up, release our claim */

> -	gpio_set_value(arb->our_gpio, arb->our_gpio_release);

> +	gpiod_set_value(arb->our_gpio, 0);

>   	udelay(arb->slew_delay_us);

>   	dev_err(muxc->dev, "Could not claim bus, timeout\n");

>   	return -EBUSY;

> @@ -103,7 +96,7 @@ static int i2c_arbitrator_deselect(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan)

>   	const struct i2c_arbitrator_data *arb = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);

>   

>   	/* Release the bus and wait for the other master to notice */

> -	gpio_set_value(arb->our_gpio, arb->our_gpio_release);

> +	gpiod_set_value(arb->our_gpio, 0);

>   	udelay(arb->slew_delay_us);

>   

>   	return 0;

> @@ -116,8 +109,7 @@ static int i2c_arbitrator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

>   	struct device_node *parent_np;

>   	struct i2c_mux_core *muxc;

>   	struct i2c_arbitrator_data *arb;

> -	enum of_gpio_flags gpio_flags;

> -	unsigned long out_init;

> +	struct gpio_desc *dummy;

>   	int ret;

>   

>   	/* We only support probing from device tree; no platform_data */

> @@ -138,45 +130,28 @@ static int i2c_arbitrator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

>   

>   	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, muxc);

>   

> -	/* Request GPIOs */

> -	ret = of_get_named_gpio_flags(np, "our-claim-gpio", 0, &gpio_flags);

> -	if (!gpio_is_valid(ret)) {

> -		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)

> -			dev_err(dev, "Error getting our-claim-gpio\n");

> -		return ret;

> -	}

> -	arb->our_gpio = ret;

> -	arb->our_gpio_release = !!(gpio_flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW);

> -	out_init = (gpio_flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) ?

> -		GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH : GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW;

> -	ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, arb->our_gpio, out_init,

> -				    "our-claim-gpio");

> -	if (ret) {

> -		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)

> -			dev_err(dev, "Error requesting our-claim-gpio\n");

> -		return ret;

> +	/* Request GPIOs, our GPIO as unclaimed to begin with */

> +	arb->our_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "our-claim", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);

> +	if (IS_ERR(arb->our_gpio)) {

> +		dev_err(dev, "could not get \"our-claim\" GPIO (%ld)\n",

> +			PTR_ERR(arb->our_gpio));

> +		return PTR_ERR(arb->our_gpio);

>   	}

>   

> -	ret = of_get_named_gpio_flags(np, "their-claim-gpios", 0, &gpio_flags);

> -	if (!gpio_is_valid(ret)) {

> -		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)

> -			dev_err(dev, "Error getting their-claim-gpio\n");

> -		return ret;

> -	}

> -	arb->their_gpio = ret;

> -	arb->their_gpio_release = !!(gpio_flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW);

> -	ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, arb->their_gpio, GPIOF_IN,

> -				    "their-claim-gpio");

> -	if (ret) {

> -		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)

> -			dev_err(dev, "Error requesting their-claim-gpio\n");

> -		return ret;

> +	arb->their_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "their-claim", GPIOD_IN);

> +	if (IS_ERR(arb->their_gpio)) {

> +		dev_err(dev, "could not get \"their-claim\" GPIO (%ld)\n",

> +			PTR_ERR(arb->their_gpio));

> +		return PTR_ERR(arb->their_gpio);

>   	}

>   

>   	/* At the moment we only support a single two master (us + 1 other) */

> -	if (gpio_is_valid(of_get_named_gpio(np, "their-claim-gpios", 1))) {

> +	dummy = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, "their-claim", 1, GPIOD_IN);

> +	if (!IS_ERR(dummy)) {

>   		dev_err(dev, "Only one other master is supported\n");

>   		return -EINVAL;

> +	} else if (PTR_ERR(dummy) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {

> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;

>   	}

>   

>   	/* Arbitration parameters */


Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Doug Anderson June 3, 2019, 4:10 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 9:59 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>

> Instead of complex code picking GPIOs out of the device tree

> and keeping track of polarity for each GPIO line, use descriptors

> and pull polarity handling into the gpiolib.

>

> We look for "our-claim" and "their-claim" since the gpiolib

> code will try e.g. "our-claim-gpios" and "our-claim-gpio" in

> turn to locate these GPIO lines from the device tree.

>

> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

> ---

> ChangeLog v1->v2:

> - Print some errors if we fail to obtain GPIOs.

> - Switch to devm_gpiod_get_index() and !IS_ERR() on the result

>   to check for an unsupported multimaster set-up.

> - Especially handle if the second master returns -EPROBE_DEFER

>   even in the case of the optional GPIO that we explicitly bail

>   out on if found, as it may be a sign that the GPIO controllers

>   are not yet up.

> ---

>  drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c | 79 ++++++++--------------

>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)


Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Peter Rosin June 11, 2019, 7:19 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2019-06-01 18:59, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Instead of complex code picking GPIOs out of the device tree

> and keeping track of polarity for each GPIO line, use descriptors

> and pull polarity handling into the gpiolib.

> 

> We look for "our-claim" and "their-claim" since the gpiolib

> code will try e.g. "our-claim-gpios" and "our-claim-gpio" in

> turn to locate these GPIO lines from the device tree.

> 

> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>


Thanks, patch applied to i2c-mux/for-next

The DT bindings should probably be updated to specify our-claim-gpios
instead of our-claim-gpio. Curiously enough, the bindings already
specifies their-claim-gpios, even if the driver never did support
that. That is, until this patch.

Cheers,
Peter
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c
index 812b8cff265f..a664f637bc3d 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.c
@@ -15,12 +15,11 @@ 
  */
 
 #include <linux/delay.h>
-#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/i2c.h>
 #include <linux/i2c-mux.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
@@ -28,22 +27,16 @@ 
 /**
  * struct i2c_arbitrator_data - Driver data for I2C arbitrator
  *
- * @our_gpio: GPIO we'll use to claim.
- * @our_gpio_release: 0 if active high; 1 if active low; AKA if the GPIO ==
- *   this then consider it released.
- * @their_gpio: GPIO that the other side will use to claim.
- * @their_gpio_release: 0 if active high; 1 if active low; AKA if the GPIO ==
- *   this then consider it released.
+ * @our_gpio: GPIO descriptor we'll use to claim.
+ * @their_gpio: GPIO descriptor that the other side will use to claim.
  * @slew_delay_us: microseconds to wait for a GPIO to go high.
  * @wait_retry_us: we'll attempt another claim after this many microseconds.
  * @wait_free_us: we'll give up after this many microseconds.
  */
 
 struct i2c_arbitrator_data {
-	int our_gpio;
-	int our_gpio_release;
-	int their_gpio;
-	int their_gpio_release;
+	struct gpio_desc *our_gpio;
+	struct gpio_desc *their_gpio;
 	unsigned int slew_delay_us;
 	unsigned int wait_retry_us;
 	unsigned int wait_free_us;
@@ -64,15 +57,15 @@  static int i2c_arbitrator_select(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan)
 	stop_time = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(arb->wait_free_us) + 1;
 	do {
 		/* Indicate that we want to claim the bus */
-		gpio_set_value(arb->our_gpio, !arb->our_gpio_release);
+		gpiod_set_value(arb->our_gpio, 1);
 		udelay(arb->slew_delay_us);
 
 		/* Wait for the other master to release it */
 		stop_retry = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(arb->wait_retry_us) + 1;
 		while (time_before(jiffies, stop_retry)) {
-			int gpio_val = !!gpio_get_value(arb->their_gpio);
+			int gpio_val = gpiod_get_value(arb->their_gpio);
 
-			if (gpio_val == arb->their_gpio_release) {
+			if (!gpio_val) {
 				/* We got it, so return */
 				return 0;
 			}
@@ -81,13 +74,13 @@  static int i2c_arbitrator_select(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan)
 		}
 
 		/* It didn't release, so give up, wait, and try again */
-		gpio_set_value(arb->our_gpio, arb->our_gpio_release);
+		gpiod_set_value(arb->our_gpio, 0);
 
 		usleep_range(arb->wait_retry_us, arb->wait_retry_us * 2);
 	} while (time_before(jiffies, stop_time));
 
 	/* Give up, release our claim */
-	gpio_set_value(arb->our_gpio, arb->our_gpio_release);
+	gpiod_set_value(arb->our_gpio, 0);
 	udelay(arb->slew_delay_us);
 	dev_err(muxc->dev, "Could not claim bus, timeout\n");
 	return -EBUSY;
@@ -103,7 +96,7 @@  static int i2c_arbitrator_deselect(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan)
 	const struct i2c_arbitrator_data *arb = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);
 
 	/* Release the bus and wait for the other master to notice */
-	gpio_set_value(arb->our_gpio, arb->our_gpio_release);
+	gpiod_set_value(arb->our_gpio, 0);
 	udelay(arb->slew_delay_us);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -116,8 +109,7 @@  static int i2c_arbitrator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device_node *parent_np;
 	struct i2c_mux_core *muxc;
 	struct i2c_arbitrator_data *arb;
-	enum of_gpio_flags gpio_flags;
-	unsigned long out_init;
+	struct gpio_desc *dummy;
 	int ret;
 
 	/* We only support probing from device tree; no platform_data */
@@ -138,45 +130,28 @@  static int i2c_arbitrator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, muxc);
 
-	/* Request GPIOs */
-	ret = of_get_named_gpio_flags(np, "our-claim-gpio", 0, &gpio_flags);
-	if (!gpio_is_valid(ret)) {
-		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
-			dev_err(dev, "Error getting our-claim-gpio\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
-	arb->our_gpio = ret;
-	arb->our_gpio_release = !!(gpio_flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW);
-	out_init = (gpio_flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) ?
-		GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH : GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW;
-	ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, arb->our_gpio, out_init,
-				    "our-claim-gpio");
-	if (ret) {
-		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
-			dev_err(dev, "Error requesting our-claim-gpio\n");
-		return ret;
+	/* Request GPIOs, our GPIO as unclaimed to begin with */
+	arb->our_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "our-claim", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+	if (IS_ERR(arb->our_gpio)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "could not get \"our-claim\" GPIO (%ld)\n",
+			PTR_ERR(arb->our_gpio));
+		return PTR_ERR(arb->our_gpio);
 	}
 
-	ret = of_get_named_gpio_flags(np, "their-claim-gpios", 0, &gpio_flags);
-	if (!gpio_is_valid(ret)) {
-		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
-			dev_err(dev, "Error getting their-claim-gpio\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
-	arb->their_gpio = ret;
-	arb->their_gpio_release = !!(gpio_flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW);
-	ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, arb->their_gpio, GPIOF_IN,
-				    "their-claim-gpio");
-	if (ret) {
-		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
-			dev_err(dev, "Error requesting their-claim-gpio\n");
-		return ret;
+	arb->their_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "their-claim", GPIOD_IN);
+	if (IS_ERR(arb->their_gpio)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "could not get \"their-claim\" GPIO (%ld)\n",
+			PTR_ERR(arb->their_gpio));
+		return PTR_ERR(arb->their_gpio);
 	}
 
 	/* At the moment we only support a single two master (us + 1 other) */
-	if (gpio_is_valid(of_get_named_gpio(np, "their-claim-gpios", 1))) {
+	dummy = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, "their-claim", 1, GPIOD_IN);
+	if (!IS_ERR(dummy)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Only one other master is supported\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
+	} else if (PTR_ERR(dummy) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
+		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
 	}
 
 	/* Arbitration parameters */