Message ID | 20200319022102.188776-1-edumazet@google.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [net] tcp: repair: fix TCP_QUEUE_SEQ implementation | expand |
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c index eb2d80519f8e5ad165ca3b8acef2b10bdf8b7345..dc77c303e6f7f69b24170010b6a295d179342676 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c @@ -2948,8 +2948,10 @@ static int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, err = -EPERM; else if (tp->repair_queue == TCP_SEND_QUEUE) WRITE_ONCE(tp->write_seq, val); - else if (tp->repair_queue == TCP_RECV_QUEUE) + else if (tp->repair_queue == TCP_RECV_QUEUE) { WRITE_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt, val); + WRITE_ONCE(tp->copied_seq, val); + } else err = -EINVAL; break;
When application uses TCP_QUEUE_SEQ socket option to change tp->rcv_next, we must also update tp->copied_seq. Otherwise, stuff relying on tcp_inq() being precise can eventually be confused. For example, tcp_zerocopy_receive() might crash because it does not expect tcp_recv_skb() to return NULL. We could add tests in various places to fix the issue, or simply make sure tcp_inq() wont return a random value, and leave fast path as it is. Note that this fixes ioctl(fd, SIOCINQ, &val) at the same time. Fixes: ee9952831cfd ("tcp: Initial repair mode") Fixes: 05255b823a61 ("tcp: add TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE support for zerocopy receive") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> --- net/ipv4/tcp.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)