| Message ID | 20200511141103.43768-3-imammedo@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | None | expand |
diff --git a/hw/core/numa.c b/hw/core/numa.c index 316bc50d75..5f81900f88 100644 --- a/hw/core/numa.c +++ b/hw/core/numa.c @@ -757,6 +757,11 @@ void numa_complete_configuration(MachineState *ms) } if (!numa_uses_legacy_mem() && mc->default_ram_id) { + if (ms->ram_memdev_id) { + error_report("'-machine memory-backend' and '-numa memdev'" + " properties are mutually exclusive"); + exit(1); + } ms->ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); memory_region_init(ms->ram, OBJECT(ms), mc->default_ram_id, ram_size);
Options -M memory-backend and -numa memdev are mutually exclusive, and if used together, it might lead to a crash in the worst case. For example when the same backend is used with these options together: -m 4G \ -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=4G \ -M pc,memory-backend=mem0 \ -numa node,memdev=mem0 QEMU will abort with: exec.c:2006: qemu_ram_set_idstr: Assertion `!new_block->idstr[0]' failed. and following backtrace: abort () qemu_ram_set_idstr () vmstate_register_ram () vmstate_register_ram_global () machine_consume_memdev () numa_init_memdev_container () numa_complete_configuration () machine_run_board_init () add a check to error out in case the user tries to use both options at the same time. Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> --- hw/core/numa.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)