Message ID | 53E98117.9090904@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Kugan <kugan.vivekanandarajah@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 11/08/14 18:03, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Kugan <kugan.vivekanandarajah@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52904 >>> >>> Tescase was generating warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur >>> when simplifying conditional to constant [-Wstrict-overflow] due to VRP >>> missing the value range. >>> >>> This seems to have been fixed and the PR is now closed. However, as >>> requested there in the PR, I am sending this patch to add the test-case >>> to test-suite. >>> >>> >>> Is this OK ? >> >> Did you verify the testcase fails before the revision that fixed it? >> Esp. the placement of the dg-bogus looks bogus to me. > > I tried it on Linaro 4.9 (It should be the same in fsf gcc 4.9 branch) > and the test cases is failing there. Passes on trunk. Well, it probably fails because of excess errors, not because of the dg-bogus failing. The dg-bogus has to be on the line that the warning triggers on. > In any case, I have moved it to the top and reverified. I have also > trimmed the warning pattern to check as there was some changes there > from 4.9 to trunk. > >> >> Also don't use -S in dg-options, use lower-case filenames and >> avoid spurious vertical white-space. The VRP dump scan is >> also very unspecific - I suggest to drop it entirely. >> > > Done. > > > Is this OK? Err. @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ + Excessive vertical space +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-Wstrict-overflow -O2" } */ +/* { dg-bogus "assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying" */ + Missing closing } Thanks, Richard. > > Thanks, > Kugan > > gcc/testsuite > 2014-08-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kuganv@linaro.org> > > PR tree-optimization/52904 > * gcc.dg/pr52904.c: New test. > > > >> Thanks, >> Richard. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Kugan >>> >>> gcc/testsuite >>> >>> >>> 2014-08-09 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kuganv@linaro.org> >>> >>> PR tree-optimization/52904 >>> * gcc.dg/PR52904.c: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr52904.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr52904.c index e69de29..7c04187 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr52904.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr52904.c @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ + +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-Wstrict-overflow -O2" } */ +/* { dg-bogus "assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying" */ + +extern int foo (int); + +int +wait_reading_process_output (void) +{ + int nfds = 0; + int channel; + for (channel = 0; channel < 1024; ++channel) + { + if (foo (channel)) + nfds++; + } + + if (nfds < 0) + return 1; + + return 0; +} +