diff mbox series

[v4,6/9] firmware: qcom_scm: update comment for ICE-related functions

Message ID 20210104184542.4616-7-ebiggers@kernel.org
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [v4,1/9] mmc: add basic support for inline encryption | expand

Commit Message

Eric Biggers Jan. 4, 2021, 6:45 p.m. UTC 
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

The SCM calls QCOM_SCM_ES_INVALIDATE_ICE_KEY and
QCOM_SCM_ES_CONFIG_SET_ICE_KEY are also needed for eMMC inline
encryption support, not just for UFS.  Update the comments accordingly.

Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
index 7be48c1bec96d..f57779fc7ee93 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
@@ -965,8 +965,11 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_ice_available);
  * qcom_scm_ice_invalidate_key() - Invalidate an inline encryption key
  * @index: the keyslot to invalidate
  *
- * The UFSHCI standard defines a standard way to do this, but it doesn't work on
- * these SoCs; only this SCM call does.
+ * The UFSHCI and eMMC standards define a standard way to do this, but it
+ * doesn't work on these SoCs; only this SCM call does.
+ *
+ * It is assumed that the SoC has only one ICE instance being used, as this SCM
+ * call doesn't specify which ICE instance the keyslot belongs to.
  *
  * Return: 0 on success; -errno on failure.
  */
@@ -995,10 +998,13 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_ice_invalidate_key);
  *		    units, e.g. 1 = 512 bytes, 8 = 4096 bytes, etc.
  *
  * Program a key into a keyslot of Qualcomm ICE (Inline Crypto Engine), where it
- * can then be used to encrypt/decrypt UFS I/O requests inline.
+ * can then be used to encrypt/decrypt UFS or eMMC I/O requests inline.
+ *
+ * The UFSHCI and eMMC standards define a standard way to do this, but it
+ * doesn't work on these SoCs; only this SCM call does.
  *
- * The UFSHCI standard defines a standard way to do this, but it doesn't work on
- * these SoCs; only this SCM call does.
+ * It is assumed that the SoC has only one ICE instance being used, as this SCM
+ * call doesn't specify which ICE instance the keyslot belongs to.
  *
  * Return: 0 on success; -errno on failure.
  */