@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ void static_key_slow_inc_cpuslocked(stru
int v, v1;
STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key);
+ lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
/*
* Careful if we get concurrent static_key_slow_inc() calls;
@@ -128,6 +129,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(static_key_slow_inc);
void static_key_enable_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key)
{
STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key);
+ lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
if (atomic_read(&key->enabled) > 0) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&key->enabled) != 1);
@@ -158,6 +160,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(static_key_enable);
void static_key_disable_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key)
{
STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key);
+ lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
if (atomic_read(&key->enabled) != 1) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&key->enabled) != 0);
@@ -183,6 +186,8 @@ static void __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslo
unsigned long rate_limit,
struct delayed_work *work)
{
+ lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+
/*
* The negative count check is valid even when a negative
* key->enabled is in use by static_key_slow_inc(); a