Message ID | 1614773878-8058-13-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Add binding updates and DT files for SC7280 SoC | expand |
Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2021-03-03 04:17:56) > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > index fe4fdb9..aa6f847 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > @@ -239,6 +239,25 @@ > interrupt-controller; > }; > > + spmi_bus: spmi@c440000 { > + compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb"; > + reg = <0 0x0c440000 0 0x1100>, > + <0 0x0c600000 0 0x2000000>, > + <0 0x0e600000 0 0x100000>, > + <0 0x0e700000 0 0xa0000>, > + <0 0x0c40a000 0 0x26000>; > + reg-names = "core", "chnls", "obsrvr", "intr", "cnfg"; > + interrupt-names = "periph_irq"; > + interrupts-extended = <&pdc 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + qcom,ee = <0>; > + qcom,channel = <0>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; I see the binding says these should be 2 instead of 1 but I suspect that is incorrect. > + interrupt-controller; > + #interrupt-cells = <4>; > + cell-index = <0>; Is cell-index used? Please remove as I don't see it used anywhere and not in the binding. > + }; > + > tlmm: pinctrl@f100000 { > compatible = "qcom,sc7280-pinctrl"; > reg = <0 0x0f100000 0 0x1000000>;
On 3/4/2021 5:42 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2021-03-03 04:17:56) >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi >> index fe4fdb9..aa6f847 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi >> @@ -239,6 +239,25 @@ >> interrupt-controller; >> }; >> >> + spmi_bus: spmi@c440000 { >> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb"; >> + reg = <0 0x0c440000 0 0x1100>, >> + <0 0x0c600000 0 0x2000000>, >> + <0 0x0e600000 0 0x100000>, >> + <0 0x0e700000 0 0xa0000>, >> + <0 0x0c40a000 0 0x26000>; >> + reg-names = "core", "chnls", "obsrvr", "intr", "cnfg"; >> + interrupt-names = "periph_irq"; >> + interrupts-extended = <&pdc 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + qcom,ee = <0>; >> + qcom,channel = <0>; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <1>; > > I see the binding says these should be 2 instead of 1 but I suspect that > is incorrect. yeah looks like the bindings need to be fixed > >> + interrupt-controller; >> + #interrupt-cells = <4>; >> + cell-index = <0>; > > Is cell-index used? Please remove as I don't see it used anywhere and > not in the binding. I'll drop it. thanks > >> + }; >> + >> tlmm: pinctrl@f100000 { >> compatible = "qcom,sc7280-pinctrl"; >> reg = <0 0x0f100000 0 0x1000000>; -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi index fe4fdb9..aa6f847 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi @@ -239,6 +239,25 @@ interrupt-controller; }; + spmi_bus: spmi@c440000 { + compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb"; + reg = <0 0x0c440000 0 0x1100>, + <0 0x0c600000 0 0x2000000>, + <0 0x0e600000 0 0x100000>, + <0 0x0e700000 0 0xa0000>, + <0 0x0c40a000 0 0x26000>; + reg-names = "core", "chnls", "obsrvr", "intr", "cnfg"; + interrupt-names = "periph_irq"; + interrupts-extended = <&pdc 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + qcom,ee = <0>; + qcom,channel = <0>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + interrupt-controller; + #interrupt-cells = <4>; + cell-index = <0>; + }; + tlmm: pinctrl@f100000 { compatible = "qcom,sc7280-pinctrl"; reg = <0 0x0f100000 0 0x1000000>;