diff mbox series

[net-next,4/8] udp: never accept GSO_FRAGLIST packets

Message ID c77bb9511c1c10193cc05651ed785506d6aee3e8.1616345643.git.pabeni@redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series udp: GRO L4 improvements | expand

Commit Message

Paolo Abeni March 21, 2021, 5:01 p.m. UTC
Currently the UDP protocol delivers GSO_FRAGLIST packets to
the sockets without the expected segmentation.

This change addresses the issue introducing and maintaining
a per socket bitmask of GSO types requiring segmentation.
Enabling GSO removes SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 from such mask, while
GSO_FRAGLIST packets are never accepted

Note: this also updates the 'unused' field size to really
fit the otherwise existing hole. It's size become incorrect
after commit bec1f6f69736 ("udp: generate gso with UDP_SEGMENT").

Fixes: 9fd1ff5d2ac7 ("udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO.")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/udp.h | 10 ++++++----
 net/ipv4/udp.c      | 12 +++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Willem de Bruijn March 22, 2021, 1:42 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 1:01 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
>

> Currently the UDP protocol delivers GSO_FRAGLIST packets to

> the sockets without the expected segmentation.

>

> This change addresses the issue introducing and maintaining

> a per socket bitmask of GSO types requiring segmentation.

> Enabling GSO removes SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 from such mask, while

> GSO_FRAGLIST packets are never accepted

>

> Note: this also updates the 'unused' field size to really

> fit the otherwise existing hole. It's size become incorrect

> after commit bec1f6f69736 ("udp: generate gso with UDP_SEGMENT").

>

> Fixes: 9fd1ff5d2ac7 ("udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO.")

> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

> ---

>  include/linux/udp.h | 10 ++++++----

>  net/ipv4/udp.c      | 12 +++++++++++-

>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

>

> diff --git a/include/linux/udp.h b/include/linux/udp.h

> index aa84597bdc33c..6da342f15f351 100644

> --- a/include/linux/udp.h

> +++ b/include/linux/udp.h

> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct udp_sock {

>                                            * different encapsulation layer set

>                                            * this

>                                            */

> -                        gro_enabled:1; /* Can accept GRO packets */

> +                        gro_enabled:1; /* Request GRO aggregation */


unnecessary comment change?

>         /*

>          * Following member retains the information to create a UDP header

>          * when the socket is uncorked.

> @@ -68,7 +68,10 @@ struct udp_sock {

>  #define UDPLITE_SEND_CC  0x2           /* set via udplite setsockopt         */

>  #define UDPLITE_RECV_CC  0x4           /* set via udplite setsocktopt        */

>         __u8             pcflag;        /* marks socket as UDP-Lite if > 0    */

> -       __u8             unused[3];

> +       __u8             unused[1];

> +       unsigned int     unexpected_gso;/* GSO types this socket can't accept,

> +                                        * any of SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 or SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST

> +                                        */


An extra unsigned int for this seems overkill.

Current sockets that support SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 implicitly also support
SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST. This patch makes explicit that the second is not
supported..

>         /*

>          * For encapsulation sockets.

>          */

> @@ -131,8 +134,7 @@ static inline void udp_cmsg_recv(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,

>

>  static inline bool udp_unexpected_gso(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)

>  {

> -       return !udp_sk(sk)->gro_enabled && skb_is_gso(skb) &&

> -              skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_L4;

> +       return skb_is_gso(skb) && skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & udp_sk(sk)->unexpected_gso;


.. just update this function as follows ?

 -       return !udp_sk(sk)->gro_enabled && skb_is_gso(skb) &&
 -              skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_L4;
+       return skb_is_gso(skb) &&
+                 (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST ||
!udp_sk(sk)->gro_enabled)

where the latter is shorthand for

  (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 && !udp_sk(sk)->gro_enabled)

but the are the only two GSO types that could arrive here.
Paolo Abeni March 22, 2021, 5:09 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 09:42 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 1:01 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:

> > Currently the UDP protocol delivers GSO_FRAGLIST packets to

> > the sockets without the expected segmentation.

> > 

> > This change addresses the issue introducing and maintaining

> > a per socket bitmask of GSO types requiring segmentation.

> > Enabling GSO removes SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 from such mask, while

> > GSO_FRAGLIST packets are never accepted

> > 

> > Note: this also updates the 'unused' field size to really

> > fit the otherwise existing hole. It's size become incorrect

> > after commit bec1f6f69736 ("udp: generate gso with UDP_SEGMENT").

> > 

> > Fixes: 9fd1ff5d2ac7 ("udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO.")

> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

> > ---

> >  include/linux/udp.h | 10 ++++++----

> >  net/ipv4/udp.c      | 12 +++++++++++-

> >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

> > 

> > diff --git a/include/linux/udp.h b/include/linux/udp.h

> > index aa84597bdc33c..6da342f15f351 100644

> > --- a/include/linux/udp.h

> > +++ b/include/linux/udp.h

> > @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct udp_sock {

> >                                            * different encapsulation layer set

> >                                            * this

> >                                            */

> > -                        gro_enabled:1; /* Can accept GRO packets */

> > +                        gro_enabled:1; /* Request GRO aggregation */

> 

> unnecessary comment change?


Before this patch 'gro_enabled' was used in udp_unexpected_gso() to
check for GSO packets acceptance, after this patch such field is not
used there anymore, so does not carry explicilty the 'accept GRO
packets' semantic.

Anyway I don't have strong feeling regarding changing or not this
comment

> >         /*

> >          * Following member retains the information to create a UDP header

> >          * when the socket is uncorked.

> > @@ -68,7 +68,10 @@ struct udp_sock {

> >  #define UDPLITE_SEND_CC  0x2           /* set via udplite setsockopt         */

> >  #define UDPLITE_RECV_CC  0x4           /* set via udplite setsocktopt        */

> >         __u8             pcflag;        /* marks socket as UDP-Lite if > 0    */

> > -       __u8             unused[3];

> > +       __u8             unused[1];

> > +       unsigned int     unexpected_gso;/* GSO types this socket can't accept,

> > +                                        * any of SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 or SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST

> > +                                        */

> 

> An extra unsigned int for this seems overkill.


Should be more clear after the next patch.

Using an explicit 'acceptable GSO types' field makes the patch 5/8
quite simple.

After this patch the 'udp_sock' struct size remains unchanged and even
the number of 'udp_sock' cachelines touched for every packet is
unchanged.

I opted for an 'unsigned int' so that I could simply copy a gso_type
there.

> Current sockets that support SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 implicitly also support

> SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST. This patch makes explicit that the second is not

> supported..

> 

> >         /*

> >          * For encapsulation sockets.

> >          */

> > @@ -131,8 +134,7 @@ static inline void udp_cmsg_recv(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,

> > 

> >  static inline bool udp_unexpected_gso(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)

> >  {

> > -       return !udp_sk(sk)->gro_enabled && skb_is_gso(skb) &&

> > -              skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_L4;

> > +       return skb_is_gso(skb) && skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & udp_sk(sk)->unexpected_gso;

> 

> .. just update this function as follows ?

> 

>  -       return !udp_sk(sk)->gro_enabled && skb_is_gso(skb) &&

>  -              skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_L4;

> +       return skb_is_gso(skb) &&

> +                 (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST ||

> !udp_sk(sk)->gro_enabled)

> 

> where the latter is shorthand for

> 

>   (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 && !udp_sk(sk)->gro_enabled)

> 

> but the are the only two GSO types that could arrive here.


With the above patch 5/8 becomes messy ?!?

Thanks!

Paolo
Willem de Bruijn March 24, 2021, 2:21 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:12 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
>

> On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 09:42 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:

> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 1:01 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:

> > > Currently the UDP protocol delivers GSO_FRAGLIST packets to

> > > the sockets without the expected segmentation.

> > >

> > > This change addresses the issue introducing and maintaining

> > > a per socket bitmask of GSO types requiring segmentation.

> > > Enabling GSO removes SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 from such mask, while

> > > GSO_FRAGLIST packets are never accepted

> > >

> > > Note: this also updates the 'unused' field size to really

> > > fit the otherwise existing hole. It's size become incorrect

> > > after commit bec1f6f69736 ("udp: generate gso with UDP_SEGMENT").

> > >

> > > Fixes: 9fd1ff5d2ac7 ("udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO.")

> > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

> > > ---

> > >  include/linux/udp.h | 10 ++++++----

> > >  net/ipv4/udp.c      | 12 +++++++++++-

> > >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

> > >


> > >         /*

> > >          * Following member retains the information to create a UDP header

> > >          * when the socket is uncorked.

> > > @@ -68,7 +68,10 @@ struct udp_sock {

> > >  #define UDPLITE_SEND_CC  0x2           /* set via udplite setsockopt         */

> > >  #define UDPLITE_RECV_CC  0x4           /* set via udplite setsocktopt        */

> > >         __u8             pcflag;        /* marks socket as UDP-Lite if > 0    */

> > > -       __u8             unused[3];

> > > +       __u8             unused[1];

> > > +       unsigned int     unexpected_gso;/* GSO types this socket can't accept,

> > > +                                        * any of SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 or SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST

> > > +                                        */

> >

> > An extra unsigned int for this seems overkill.

>

> Should be more clear after the next patch.

>

> Using an explicit 'acceptable GSO types' field makes the patch 5/8

> quite simple.

>

> After this patch the 'udp_sock' struct size remains unchanged and even

> the number of 'udp_sock' cachelines touched for every packet is

> unchanged.


But there is opportunity cost, of course. Next time we need to add
something to the struct, we will add a new cacheline.

A 32-bit field for just 2 bits, where 1 already exists does seem like overkill.

More importantly, I just think it's less obvious code than a pair of fields

  accepts_udp_l4:1,
  accepts_udp_fraglist:1,

Local sockets can only accept the first, as there does not exist an
interface to pass along the multiple frag sizes that a frag_list based
approach might have.

Sockets with encap_rcv != NULL may opt-in to being able to handle either.

I think explicit code will be more maintainable. At the cost of
perhaps two branches instead of one, admittedly. But that seems
premature optimization.
Paolo Abeni March 24, 2021, 6:59 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 22:21 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:12 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:

> > On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 09:42 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:

> > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 1:01 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:

> > > > Currently the UDP protocol delivers GSO_FRAGLIST packets to

> > > > the sockets without the expected segmentation.

> > > > 

> > > > This change addresses the issue introducing and maintaining

> > > > a per socket bitmask of GSO types requiring segmentation.

> > > > Enabling GSO removes SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 from such mask, while

> > > > GSO_FRAGLIST packets are never accepted

> > > > 

> > > > Note: this also updates the 'unused' field size to really

> > > > fit the otherwise existing hole. It's size become incorrect

> > > > after commit bec1f6f69736 ("udp: generate gso with UDP_SEGMENT").

> > > > 

> > > > Fixes: 9fd1ff5d2ac7 ("udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO.")

> > > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

> > > > ---

> > > >  include/linux/udp.h | 10 ++++++----

> > > >  net/ipv4/udp.c      | 12 +++++++++++-

> > > >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

> > > > 

> > > >         /*

> > > >          * Following member retains the information to create a UDP header

> > > >          * when the socket is uncorked.

> > > > @@ -68,7 +68,10 @@ struct udp_sock {

> > > >  #define UDPLITE_SEND_CC  0x2           /* set via udplite setsockopt         */

> > > >  #define UDPLITE_RECV_CC  0x4           /* set via udplite setsocktopt        */

> > > >         __u8             pcflag;        /* marks socket as UDP-Lite if > 0    */

> > > > -       __u8             unused[3];

> > > > +       __u8             unused[1];

> > > > +       unsigned int     unexpected_gso;/* GSO types this socket can't accept,

> > > > +                                        * any of SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 or SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST

> > > > +                                        */

> > > 

> > > An extra unsigned int for this seems overkill.

> > 

> > Should be more clear after the next patch.

> > 

> > Using an explicit 'acceptable GSO types' field makes the patch 5/8

> > quite simple.

> > 

> > After this patch the 'udp_sock' struct size remains unchanged and even

> > the number of 'udp_sock' cachelines touched for every packet is

> > unchanged.

> 

> But there is opportunity cost, of course. Next time we need to add

> something to the struct, we will add a new cacheline.

> 

> A 32-bit field for just 2 bits, where 1 already exists does seem like overkill.

> 

> More importantly, I just think it's less obvious code than a pair of fields

> 

>   accepts_udp_l4:1,

>   accepts_udp_fraglist:1,

> 

> Local sockets can only accept the first, as there does not exist an

> interface to pass along the multiple frag sizes that a frag_list based

> approach might have.

> 

> Sockets with encap_rcv != NULL may opt-in to being able to handle either.

> 

> I think explicit code will be more maintainable. 


ok

> At the cost of

> perhaps two branches instead of one, admittedly. But that seems

> premature optimization.


well, if it don't hurt too much your eyes, something along the
following could save udp_sock space and code branches:

    rejects_udp_l4_fraglist:2;

#define SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT (NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4_BIT - NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)
 static inline bool udp_unexpected_gso(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
	BUILD_BUG_ON(1 << SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT != SKB_GSO_UDP_L4);
	BUILD_BUG_ON(1 << (SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT + 1) != SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST);
 	return skb_is_gso(skb) && skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type &
		(udp_sk(sk)->rejects_udp_l4_fraglist << SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT);
 }

(not sure if /me runs/hides ;)

/P
Willem de Bruijn March 24, 2021, 10:12 p.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 3:00 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
>

> On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 22:21 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:

> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:12 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:

> > > On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 09:42 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:

> > > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 1:01 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:

> > > > > Currently the UDP protocol delivers GSO_FRAGLIST packets to

> > > > > the sockets without the expected segmentation.

> > > > >

> > > > > This change addresses the issue introducing and maintaining

> > > > > a per socket bitmask of GSO types requiring segmentation.

> > > > > Enabling GSO removes SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 from such mask, while

> > > > > GSO_FRAGLIST packets are never accepted

> > > > >

> > > > > Note: this also updates the 'unused' field size to really

> > > > > fit the otherwise existing hole. It's size become incorrect

> > > > > after commit bec1f6f69736 ("udp: generate gso with UDP_SEGMENT").

> > > > >

> > > > > Fixes: 9fd1ff5d2ac7 ("udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO.")

> > > > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

> > > > > ---

> > > > >  include/linux/udp.h | 10 ++++++----

> > > > >  net/ipv4/udp.c      | 12 +++++++++++-

> > > > >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

> > > > >

> > > > >         /*

> > > > >          * Following member retains the information to create a UDP header

> > > > >          * when the socket is uncorked.

> > > > > @@ -68,7 +68,10 @@ struct udp_sock {

> > > > >  #define UDPLITE_SEND_CC  0x2           /* set via udplite setsockopt         */

> > > > >  #define UDPLITE_RECV_CC  0x4           /* set via udplite setsocktopt        */

> > > > >         __u8             pcflag;        /* marks socket as UDP-Lite if > 0    */

> > > > > -       __u8             unused[3];

> > > > > +       __u8             unused[1];

> > > > > +       unsigned int     unexpected_gso;/* GSO types this socket can't accept,

> > > > > +                                        * any of SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 or SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST

> > > > > +                                        */

> > > >

> > > > An extra unsigned int for this seems overkill.

> > >

> > > Should be more clear after the next patch.

> > >

> > > Using an explicit 'acceptable GSO types' field makes the patch 5/8

> > > quite simple.

> > >

> > > After this patch the 'udp_sock' struct size remains unchanged and even

> > > the number of 'udp_sock' cachelines touched for every packet is

> > > unchanged.

> >

> > But there is opportunity cost, of course. Next time we need to add

> > something to the struct, we will add a new cacheline.

> >

> > A 32-bit field for just 2 bits, where 1 already exists does seem like overkill.

> >

> > More importantly, I just think it's less obvious code than a pair of fields

> >

> >   accepts_udp_l4:1,

> >   accepts_udp_fraglist:1,

> >

> > Local sockets can only accept the first, as there does not exist an

> > interface to pass along the multiple frag sizes that a frag_list based

> > approach might have.

> >

> > Sockets with encap_rcv != NULL may opt-in to being able to handle either.

> >

> > I think explicit code will be more maintainable.

>

> ok

>

> > At the cost of

> > perhaps two branches instead of one, admittedly. But that seems

> > premature optimization.

>

> well, if it don't hurt too much your eyes, something along the

> following could save udp_sock space and code branches:

>

>     rejects_udp_l4_fraglist:2;

>

> #define SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT (NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4_BIT - NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)

>  static inline bool udp_unexpected_gso(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)

>  {

>         BUILD_BUG_ON(1 << SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT != SKB_GSO_UDP_L4);

>         BUILD_BUG_ON(1 << (SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT + 1) != SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST);

>         return skb_is_gso(skb) && skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type &

>                 (udp_sk(sk)->rejects_udp_l4_fraglist << SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT);

>  }

>

> (not sure if /me runs/hides ;)


:)

My opinion is just one, but I do find this a lot less readable and
hence maintainable than

  if (likely(!skb_is_gso(skb)))
     return true;

  if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 && !udp_sk(sk)->accept_udp_l4)
    return false;

  if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST &&
!udp_sk(sk)->accept_udp_fraglist)
    return false;

  return true;

at no obvious benefit. The tunnel gso code is hard enough to fathom as it is.

> /P

>

>

>
Paolo Abeni March 25, 2021, 11:50 a.m. UTC | #6
On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 18:12 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 3:00 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:

> > On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 22:21 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:

> > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:12 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:

> > > > On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 09:42 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:

> > > > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 1:01 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:

> > > > > > Currently the UDP protocol delivers GSO_FRAGLIST packets to

> > > > > > the sockets without the expected segmentation.

> > > > > > 

> > > > > > This change addresses the issue introducing and maintaining

> > > > > > a per socket bitmask of GSO types requiring segmentation.

> > > > > > Enabling GSO removes SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 from such mask, while

> > > > > > GSO_FRAGLIST packets are never accepted

> > > > > > 

> > > > > > Note: this also updates the 'unused' field size to really

> > > > > > fit the otherwise existing hole. It's size become incorrect

> > > > > > after commit bec1f6f69736 ("udp: generate gso with UDP_SEGMENT").

> > > > > > 

> > > > > > Fixes: 9fd1ff5d2ac7 ("udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO.")

> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

> > > > > > ---

> > > > > >  include/linux/udp.h | 10 ++++++----

> > > > > >  net/ipv4/udp.c      | 12 +++++++++++-

> > > > > >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

> > > > > > 

> > > > > >         /*

> > > > > >          * Following member retains the information to create a UDP header

> > > > > >          * when the socket is uncorked.

> > > > > > @@ -68,7 +68,10 @@ struct udp_sock {

> > > > > >  #define UDPLITE_SEND_CC  0x2           /* set via udplite setsockopt         */

> > > > > >  #define UDPLITE_RECV_CC  0x4           /* set via udplite setsocktopt        */

> > > > > >         __u8             pcflag;        /* marks socket as UDP-Lite if > 0    */

> > > > > > -       __u8             unused[3];

> > > > > > +       __u8             unused[1];

> > > > > > +       unsigned int     unexpected_gso;/* GSO types this socket can't accept,

> > > > > > +                                        * any of SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 or SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST

> > > > > > +                                        */

> > > > > 

> > > > > An extra unsigned int for this seems overkill.

> > > > 

> > > > Should be more clear after the next patch.

> > > > 

> > > > Using an explicit 'acceptable GSO types' field makes the patch 5/8

> > > > quite simple.

> > > > 

> > > > After this patch the 'udp_sock' struct size remains unchanged and even

> > > > the number of 'udp_sock' cachelines touched for every packet is

> > > > unchanged.

> > > 

> > > But there is opportunity cost, of course. Next time we need to add

> > > something to the struct, we will add a new cacheline.

> > > 

> > > A 32-bit field for just 2 bits, where 1 already exists does seem like overkill.

> > > 

> > > More importantly, I just think it's less obvious code than a pair of fields

> > > 

> > >   accepts_udp_l4:1,

> > >   accepts_udp_fraglist:1,

> > > 

> > > Local sockets can only accept the first, as there does not exist an

> > > interface to pass along the multiple frag sizes that a frag_list based

> > > approach might have.

> > > 

> > > Sockets with encap_rcv != NULL may opt-in to being able to handle either.

> > > 

> > > I think explicit code will be more maintainable.

> > 

> > ok

> > 

> > > At the cost of

> > > perhaps two branches instead of one, admittedly. But that seems

> > > premature optimization.

> > 

> > well, if it don't hurt too much your eyes, something along the

> > following could save udp_sock space and code branches:

> > 

> >     rejects_udp_l4_fraglist:2;

> > 

> > #define SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT (NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4_BIT - NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)

> >  static inline bool udp_unexpected_gso(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)

> >  {

> >         BUILD_BUG_ON(1 << SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT != SKB_GSO_UDP_L4);

> >         BUILD_BUG_ON(1 << (SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT + 1) != SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST);

> >         return skb_is_gso(skb) && skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type &

> >                 (udp_sk(sk)->rejects_udp_l4_fraglist << SKB_GSO_UDP_L4_SHIFT);

> >  }

> > 

> > (not sure if /me runs/hides ;)

> 

> :)

> 

> My opinion is just one, but I do find this a lot less readable and

> hence maintainable than

> 

>   if (likely(!skb_is_gso(skb)))

>      return true;

> 

>   if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 && !udp_sk(sk)->accept_udp_l4)

>     return false;

> 

>   if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST &&

> !udp_sk(sk)->accept_udp_fraglist)

>     return false;

> 

>   return true;

> 

> at no obvious benefit. The tunnel gso code is hard enough to fathom as it is.


ok.

I'm only doubtful about the likely() annotation: systems with UDP
tunnels likely expect receiving a majority of UDP-encaped traffic,
which in turn will likely be GRO (e.g. TCP over UDP-tunnel).

In my next iteration I'll use the above, dropping the annotation.

Cheers,

Paolo
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/udp.h b/include/linux/udp.h
index aa84597bdc33c..6da342f15f351 100644
--- a/include/linux/udp.h
+++ b/include/linux/udp.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@  struct udp_sock {
 					   * different encapsulation layer set
 					   * this
 					   */
-			 gro_enabled:1;	/* Can accept GRO packets */
+			 gro_enabled:1;	/* Request GRO aggregation */
 	/*
 	 * Following member retains the information to create a UDP header
 	 * when the socket is uncorked.
@@ -68,7 +68,10 @@  struct udp_sock {
 #define UDPLITE_SEND_CC  0x2  		/* set via udplite setsockopt         */
 #define UDPLITE_RECV_CC  0x4		/* set via udplite setsocktopt        */
 	__u8		 pcflag;        /* marks socket as UDP-Lite if > 0    */
-	__u8		 unused[3];
+	__u8		 unused[1];
+	unsigned int	 unexpected_gso;/* GSO types this socket can't accept,
+					 * any of SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 or SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST
+					 */
 	/*
 	 * For encapsulation sockets.
 	 */
@@ -131,8 +134,7 @@  static inline void udp_cmsg_recv(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
 
 static inline bool udp_unexpected_gso(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	return !udp_sk(sk)->gro_enabled && skb_is_gso(skb) &&
-	       skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_L4;
+	return skb_is_gso(skb) && skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & udp_sk(sk)->unexpected_gso;
 }
 
 #define udp_portaddr_for_each_entry(__sk, list) \
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index ff54135c51ffa..1ba6d153c2f0a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1600,8 +1600,13 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(udp_destruct_sock);
 
 int udp_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
 {
-	skb_queue_head_init(&udp_sk(sk)->reader_queue);
+	struct udp_sock *up = udp_sk(sk);
+
+	skb_queue_head_init(&up->reader_queue);
 	sk->sk_destruct = udp_destruct_sock;
+
+	/* do not accept any GSO packet by default */
+	up->unexpected_gso = SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST | SKB_GSO_UDP_L4;
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(udp_init_sock);
@@ -2674,8 +2679,13 @@  int udp_lib_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 
 	case UDP_GRO:
 		lock_sock(sk);
+
+		/* when enabling GRO, accept the related GSO packet type */
+		up->unexpected_gso = SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST;
 		if (valbool)
 			udp_tunnel_encap_enable(sk->sk_socket);
+		else
+			up->unexpected_gso |= SKB_GSO_UDP_L4;
 		up->gro_enabled = valbool;
 		release_sock(sk);
 		break;