Message ID | 20210325005456.152469-1-joel@jms.id.au |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | leds: pca955x: Allow full control over led name | expand |
On 3/24/21 7:54 PM, Joel Stanley wrote: > The PCA955x driver since it was merged has added a "pca955x:" prefix to > LED names. This meanas platform data (such as the device tree) cannot > fully control the name. Here's what this produces using the example in > the device tree bindings: > > # cat /sys/class/leds/ > pca955x:green:power/ > pca955x:pca9552:white/ > pca955x:pca9552:yellow/ > pca955x:red:power/ > > Some systems want the ability to configure the full string. To do this, > introduce a build time option that adds the prefix that defaults to > enabled in order to preserve existing behaviour. Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> > --- > drivers/leds/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ > drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c | 8 +++++++- > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >
Pavel / Dan, Related to this below email, Can this https://github.com/openbmc/linux/blob/dev-5.10/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c#L507 naming change ever ?. If there is any change in https://github.com/openbmc/linux/blob/dev-5.10/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c#L507, then my config having led names would break. So, please suggest me what is the right approach here for defining LEDs. I have all LEDs defined as leds { compatible = "gpio-leds”; I am being asked by Joel Stanley that I should not do that way, but instead, have the LEDs defined as PCA_955X_LED and if I do that, I have this concern with the led names. Thanks, Vishwa. > On 09-Apr-2021, at 4:43 PM, vishwanatha subbanna <vishwa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Hello Pavel / Dan, > > Wonder if you have any feedback on this patch from Joel ?.. This patch would help me have predictable LED names as I wanted instead of having the prefixes. > I have some configuration files that depend on these names. So, if the LED name ( prefix ) changes in the future, then it breaks the configuration. > > > I see good value in getting this patch in. Please could you help chime in ? > > Thank you, > !! Vishwa !! > > >> On 25-Mar-2021, at 6:24 AM, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> wrote: >> >> The PCA955x driver since it was merged has added a "pca955x:" prefix to >> LED names. This meanas platform data (such as the device tree) cannot >> fully control the name. Here's what this produces using the example in >> the device tree bindings: >> >> # cat /sys/class/leds/ >> pca955x:green:power/ >> pca955x:pca9552:white/ >> pca955x:pca9552:yellow/ >> pca955x:red:power/ >> >> Some systems want the ability to configure the full string. To do this, >> introduce a build time option that adds the prefix that defaults to >> enabled in order to preserve existing behaviour. >> >> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> >> --- >> drivers/leds/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ >> drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c | 8 +++++++- >> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig >> index b6742b4231bf..dcdb107e0967 100644 >> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig >> @@ -519,6 +519,17 @@ config LEDS_PCA955X >> LED driver chips accessed via the I2C bus. Supported >> devices include PCA9550, PCA9551, PCA9552, and PCA9553. >> >> +config LEDS_PCA955X_SYSFS_PREFIX >> + bool "PCA955x sysfs prefix" >> + depends on LEDS_PCA955X >> + default y >> + help >> + This option adds the string "pca955x:" to the start of the name >> + presented in sysfs. >> + >> + If you wish to use the label provided by platform data without a >> + prefix, disable this option. >> + >> config LEDS_PCA955X_GPIO >> bool "Enable GPIO support for PCA955X" >> depends on LEDS_PCA955X >> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c >> index 7087ca4592fc..b7742d6226b5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c >> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c >> @@ -61,6 +61,12 @@ >> #define PCA955X_GPIO_HIGH LED_OFF >> #define PCA955X_GPIO_LOW LED_FULL >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_LEDS_PCA955X_SYSFS_PREFIX >> +#define SYSFS_NAME "pca955x:%s" >> +#else >> +#define SYSFS_NAME "%s" >> +#endif >> + >> enum pca955x_type { >> pca9550, >> pca9551, >> @@ -504,7 +510,7 @@ static int pca955x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, >> sizeof(pdata->leds[i].name), "%d", i); >> >> snprintf(pca955x_led->name, >> - sizeof(pca955x_led->name), "pca955x:%s", >> + sizeof(pca955x_led->name), SYSFS_NAME, >> pdata->leds[i].name); >> >> if (pdata->leds[i].default_trigger) >> -- >> 2.30.2 >> >
On Thu 2021-03-25 11:24:56, Joel Stanley wrote: > The PCA955x driver since it was merged has added a "pca955x:" prefix to > LED names. This meanas platform data (such as the device tree) cannot > fully control the name. Here's what this produces using the example in > the device tree bindings: > > # cat /sys/class/leds/ > pca955x:green:power/ > pca955x:pca9552:white/ > pca955x:pca9552:yellow/ > pca955x:red:power/ > > Some systems want the ability to configure the full string. To do this, > introduce a build time option that adds the prefix that defaults to > enabled in order to preserve existing behaviour. No. Config option is not acceptable for this. Just delete the prefix and fix the breakage. Pavel -- http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig index b6742b4231bf..dcdb107e0967 100644 --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig @@ -519,6 +519,17 @@ config LEDS_PCA955X LED driver chips accessed via the I2C bus. Supported devices include PCA9550, PCA9551, PCA9552, and PCA9553. +config LEDS_PCA955X_SYSFS_PREFIX + bool "PCA955x sysfs prefix" + depends on LEDS_PCA955X + default y + help + This option adds the string "pca955x:" to the start of the name + presented in sysfs. + + If you wish to use the label provided by platform data without a + prefix, disable this option. + config LEDS_PCA955X_GPIO bool "Enable GPIO support for PCA955X" depends on LEDS_PCA955X diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c index 7087ca4592fc..b7742d6226b5 100644 --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c @@ -61,6 +61,12 @@ #define PCA955X_GPIO_HIGH LED_OFF #define PCA955X_GPIO_LOW LED_FULL +#ifdef CONFIG_LEDS_PCA955X_SYSFS_PREFIX +#define SYSFS_NAME "pca955x:%s" +#else +#define SYSFS_NAME "%s" +#endif + enum pca955x_type { pca9550, pca9551, @@ -504,7 +510,7 @@ static int pca955x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, sizeof(pdata->leds[i].name), "%d", i); snprintf(pca955x_led->name, - sizeof(pca955x_led->name), "pca955x:%s", + sizeof(pca955x_led->name), SYSFS_NAME, pdata->leds[i].name); if (pdata->leds[i].default_trigger)
The PCA955x driver since it was merged has added a "pca955x:" prefix to LED names. This meanas platform data (such as the device tree) cannot fully control the name. Here's what this produces using the example in the device tree bindings: # cat /sys/class/leds/ pca955x:green:power/ pca955x:pca9552:white/ pca955x:pca9552:yellow/ pca955x:red:power/ Some systems want the ability to configure the full string. To do this, introduce a build time option that adds the prefix that defaults to enabled in order to preserve existing behaviour. Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> --- drivers/leds/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c | 8 +++++++- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.30.2