@@ -98,23 +98,6 @@ static void release_idr(struct idr *idr, int id)
/* Below code defines functions to be used for cpufreq as cooling device */
-/**
- * is_cpufreq_valid - function to check frequency transitioning capability.
- * @cpu: cpu for which check is needed.
- *
- * This function will check the current state of the system if
- * it is capable of changing the frequency for a given @cpu.
- *
- * Return: 0 if the system is not currently capable of changing
- * the frequency of given cpu. !0 in case the frequency is changeable.
- */
-static int is_cpufreq_valid(int cpu)
-{
- struct cpufreq_policy policy;
-
- return !cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
-}
-
enum cpufreq_cooling_property {
GET_LEVEL,
GET_FREQ,
@@ -288,8 +271,7 @@ static int cpufreq_apply_cooling(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_device,
cpufreq_device->cpufreq_val = clip_freq;
notify_device = cpufreq_device;
- if (is_cpufreq_valid(cpu))
- cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
+ cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
notify_device = NOTIFY_INVALID;
Because get_cpu_frequency() has returned a valid frequency, it means that the cpufreq policy is surely valid and so no point checking that again with is_cpufreq_valid(). Get rid of the routine as well as there are no more users. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 20 +------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)