diff mbox

[V2,07/14] cpufreq: stats: remove cpufreq_stats_update_policy_cpu()

Message ID 53e8e4e9a40d2759ebdecfe4649f9ecee112a330.1420177186.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Viresh Kumar Jan. 2, 2015, 5:46 a.m. UTC
cpufreq_stats_update_policy_cpu() doesn't do any useful stuff anymore and must
be removed. Along with it, also remove 'cpu' field from 'struct cpufreq_stats'
as that isn't used as well.

Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

Comments

Viresh Kumar Jan. 5, 2015, 4:26 a.m. UTC | #1
On 4 January 2015 at 03:55, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> Well, "can be" sounds more appropriate than "must be".  It wouldn't hurt to
> leave it as is, after all.

> It's the reverse.  Because the cpu field is not necessary any more, it can
> be dropped *along* *with* cpufreq_stats_update_policy_cpu().
>
> Modifying data structures is more important than dropping a trivial function
> and it should be described this way in the changelog.

> Well, if you wrote it the way I suggested in the previous patch, it would be
> more obvious ...

Ack.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
index 106c89ccef30..f458fdbc5bfd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ 
 static spinlock_t cpufreq_stats_lock;
 
 struct cpufreq_stats {
-	unsigned int cpu;
 	unsigned int total_trans;
 	unsigned long long last_time;
 	unsigned int max_state;
@@ -194,7 +193,6 @@  static int __cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	if (ret)
 		goto error_out;
 
-	stat->cpu = cpu;
 	policy->stats_data = stat;
 
 	cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table)
@@ -251,24 +249,12 @@  static void cpufreq_stats_create_table(unsigned int cpu)
 	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 }
 
-static void cpufreq_stats_update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
-	struct cpufreq_stats *stat = policy->stats_data;
-
-	stat->cpu = policy->cpu;
-}
-
 static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_policy(struct notifier_block *nb,
 		unsigned long val, void *data)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
 
-	if (val == CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU) {
-		cpufreq_stats_update_policy_cpu(policy);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	if (val == CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY)
 		ret = __cpufreq_stats_create_table(policy);
 	else if (val == CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY)