Message ID | 1891546521.01623299401994.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp3 |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | scsi: ufs: Add indent for code alignment | expand |
On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 13:07 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote: > Add indentation to return statement. [] > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h [] > @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) > else > return false; > #else > -return true; > + return true; > #endif > } > Perhaps a little refactoring instead: --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h index c98d540ac044d..ed89839476b3b 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h @@ -894,15 +894,11 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_rpm_autosuspend_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) { /* DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature but is not detectable*/ -#ifndef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC - if ((hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) && - !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR)) + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC)) return true; - else - return false; -#else -return true; -#endif + + return (hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) && + !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR); } static inline bool ufshcd_can_aggressive_pc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 13:07 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote: >> Add indentation to return statement. >[] >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h >[] >> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) >> else >> return false; >> #else >> -return true; >> + return true; >> #endif >> } >> > >Perhaps a little refactoring instead: >--- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 12 ++++-------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h >index c98d540ac044d..ed89839476b3b 100644 >--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h >+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h >@@ -894,15 +894,11 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_rpm_autosuspend_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) > static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) > { > /* DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature but is not detectable*/ >-#ifndef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC >- if ((hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) && >- !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR)) >+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC)) > return true; >- else >- return false; >-#else >-return true; >-#endif >+ >+ return (hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) && >+ !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR); > } > > static inline bool ufshcd_can_aggressive_pc(struct ufs_hba *hba) > Hello Joe, Thanks for your advice. As you mentioned, refactoring looks good. However, since the content does not match the title, can I submit a patch with a new title? Best Regards, Keoseong
On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 10:28 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 13:07 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote: > > > Add indentation to return statement. > > [] > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h > > [] > > > @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool > > > ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) > > > else > > > return false; > > > #else > > > -return true; > > > + return true; > > > #endif > > > } > > > > > > > Perhaps a little refactoring instead: > > --- > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 12 ++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h > > index c98d540ac044d..ed89839476b3b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h > > @@ -894,15 +894,11 @@ static inline bool > > ufshcd_is_rpm_autosuspend_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) > > static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) > > { > > /* DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature but is not > > detectable*/ > > -#ifndef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC > > - if ((hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) && > > - !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR)) > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC)) > > return true; > > - else > > - return false; > > -#else > > -return true; > > -#endif > > + > > + return (hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) && > > + !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR); > > } > > > > static inline bool ufshcd_can_aggressive_pc(struct ufs_hba *hba) > > > > Hello Joe, > Thanks for your advice. > As you mentioned, refactoring looks good. > However, since the content does not match the title, can I submit a > patch with a new title? Yes of course.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h index 8b1d0dad0764..97dfc6e94390 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) else return false; #else -return true; + return true; #endif }
Add indentation to return statement. Signed-off-by: Keoseong Park <keosung.park@samsung.com> --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)