@@ -246,14 +246,30 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
__ret; \
})
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
-
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(ptr1, ptr2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
- cmpxchg_double_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr1)), raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr2)), \
- o1, o2, n1, n2)
+#define _protect_cmpxchg_local(pcp, o, n) \
+({ \
+ typeof(*raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp))) __ret; \
+ preempt_disable(); \
+ __ret = cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), o, n); \
+ preempt_enable(); \
+ __ret; \
+})
+
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(ptr, o, n) _protect_cmpxchg_local(ptr, o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(ptr, o, n) _protect_cmpxchg_local(ptr, o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(ptr, o, n) _protect_cmpxchg_local(ptr, o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) _protect_cmpxchg_local(ptr, o, n)
+
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(ptr1, ptr2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
+({ \
+ int __ret; \
+ preempt_disable(); \
+ __ret = cmpxchg_double_local( raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr1)), \
+ raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr2)), \
+ o1, o2, n1, n2); \
+ preempt_enable(); \
+ __ret; \
+})
#define cmpxchg64(ptr,o,n) cmpxchg((ptr),(o),(n))
#define cmpxchg64_local(ptr,o,n) cmpxchg_local((ptr),(o),(n))
@@ -204,25 +204,47 @@ static inline unsigned long __percpu_xchg(void *ptr, unsigned long val,
return ret;
}
+#define _percpu_read(pcp) \
+({ \
+ typeof(pcp) __retval; \
+ preempt_disable(); \
+ __retval = (typeof(pcp)) __percpu_read(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), \
+ sizeof(pcp)); \
+ preempt_enable(); \
+ __retval; \
+})
+
+#define _percpu_write(pcp, val) \
+do { \
+ preempt_disable(); \
+ __percpu_write(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), (unsigned long) (val), \
+ sizeof(pcp)); \
+ preempt_enable(); \
+} while(0) \
+
+#define _pcp_protect(operation, pcp, val) \
+({ \
+ typeof(pcp) __retval; \
+ preempt_disable(); \
+ __retval = (typeof(pcp)) operation(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), \
+ (val), sizeof(pcp)); \
+ preempt_enable(); \
+ __retval; \
+})
+
#define _percpu_add(pcp, val) \
- __percpu_add(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), val, sizeof(pcp))
+ _pcp_protect(__percpu_add, pcp, val)
-#define _percpu_add_return(pcp, val) (typeof(pcp)) (_percpu_add(pcp, val))
+#define _percpu_add_return(pcp, val) _percpu_add(pcp, val)
#define _percpu_and(pcp, val) \
- __percpu_and(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), val, sizeof(pcp))
+ _pcp_protect(__percpu_and, pcp, val)
#define _percpu_or(pcp, val) \
- __percpu_or(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), val, sizeof(pcp))
-
-#define _percpu_read(pcp) (typeof(pcp)) \
- (__percpu_read(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), sizeof(pcp)))
-
-#define _percpu_write(pcp, val) \
- __percpu_write(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), (unsigned long)(val), sizeof(pcp))
+ _pcp_protect(__percpu_or, pcp, val)
#define _percpu_xchg(pcp, val) (typeof(pcp)) \
- (__percpu_xchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), (unsigned long)(val), sizeof(pcp)))
+ _pcp_protect(__percpu_xchg, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
#define this_cpu_add_1(pcp, val) _percpu_add(pcp, val)
#define this_cpu_add_2(pcp, val) _percpu_add(pcp, val)
this_cpu operations were implemented for arm64 in: 5284e1b arm64: xchg: Implement cmpxchg_double f97fc81 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations Unfortunately, it is possible for pre-emption to take place between address generation and data access. This can lead to cases where data is being manipulated by this_cpu for a different CPU than it was called on. Which effectively breaks the spec. This patch disables pre-emption for the this_cpu operations guaranteeing that address generation and data manipulation take place without a pre-emption in-between. Fixes: 5284e1b4bc8a ("arm64: xchg: Implement cmpxchg_double") Fixes: f97fc810798c ("arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations") Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> --- Changed in V2, moved over to preempt_enable() completely. Corrected the "Fixes" tag. Mark, I've dropped your Reviewed-by as I've changed some logic, please let me know if I should re-add it. Cheers,