@@ -115,12 +115,6 @@ struct sja1105_info {
const struct sja1105_dynamic_table_ops *dyn_ops;
const struct sja1105_table_ops *static_ops;
const struct sja1105_regs *regs;
- /* Both E/T and P/Q/R/S have quirks when it comes to popping the S-Tag
- * from double-tagged frames. E/T will pop it only when it's equal to
- * TPID from the General Parameters Table, while P/Q/R/S will only
- * pop it when it's equal to TPID2.
- */
- u16 qinq_tpid;
bool can_limit_mcast_flood;
int (*reset_cmd)(struct dsa_switch *ds);
int (*setup_rgmii_delay)(const void *ctx, int port);
@@ -2295,15 +2295,6 @@ int sja1105_vlan_filtering(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, bool enabled,
tpid2 = ETH_P_SJA1105;
}
- for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
- struct sja1105_port *sp = &priv->ports[port];
-
- if (enabled)
- sp->xmit_tpid = priv->info->qinq_tpid;
- else
- sp->xmit_tpid = ETH_P_SJA1105;
- }
-
if (priv->vlan_aware == enabled)
return 0;
@@ -2988,7 +2979,6 @@ static int sja1105_setup_ports(struct sja1105_private *priv)
}
sp->xmit_worker = worker;
skb_queue_head_init(&sp->xmit_queue);
- sp->xmit_tpid = ETH_P_SJA1105;
}
return 0;
@@ -575,7 +575,6 @@ const struct sja1105_info sja1105e_info = {
.part_no = SJA1105ET_PART_NO,
.static_ops = sja1105e_table_ops,
.dyn_ops = sja1105et_dyn_ops,
- .qinq_tpid = ETH_P_8021Q,
.tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1105,
.can_limit_mcast_flood = false,
.ptp_ts_bits = 24,
@@ -608,7 +607,6 @@ const struct sja1105_info sja1105t_info = {
.part_no = SJA1105ET_PART_NO,
.static_ops = sja1105t_table_ops,
.dyn_ops = sja1105et_dyn_ops,
- .qinq_tpid = ETH_P_8021Q,
.tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1105,
.can_limit_mcast_flood = false,
.ptp_ts_bits = 24,
@@ -641,7 +639,6 @@ const struct sja1105_info sja1105p_info = {
.part_no = SJA1105P_PART_NO,
.static_ops = sja1105p_table_ops,
.dyn_ops = sja1105pqrs_dyn_ops,
- .qinq_tpid = ETH_P_8021AD,
.tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1105,
.can_limit_mcast_flood = true,
.ptp_ts_bits = 32,
@@ -675,7 +672,6 @@ const struct sja1105_info sja1105q_info = {
.part_no = SJA1105Q_PART_NO,
.static_ops = sja1105q_table_ops,
.dyn_ops = sja1105pqrs_dyn_ops,
- .qinq_tpid = ETH_P_8021AD,
.tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1105,
.can_limit_mcast_flood = true,
.ptp_ts_bits = 32,
@@ -709,7 +705,6 @@ const struct sja1105_info sja1105r_info = {
.part_no = SJA1105R_PART_NO,
.static_ops = sja1105r_table_ops,
.dyn_ops = sja1105pqrs_dyn_ops,
- .qinq_tpid = ETH_P_8021AD,
.tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1105,
.can_limit_mcast_flood = true,
.ptp_ts_bits = 32,
@@ -747,7 +742,6 @@ const struct sja1105_info sja1105s_info = {
.static_ops = sja1105s_table_ops,
.dyn_ops = sja1105pqrs_dyn_ops,
.regs = &sja1105pqrs_regs,
- .qinq_tpid = ETH_P_8021AD,
.tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1105,
.can_limit_mcast_flood = true,
.ptp_ts_bits = 32,
@@ -784,7 +778,6 @@ const struct sja1105_info sja1110a_info = {
.static_ops = sja1110_table_ops,
.dyn_ops = sja1110_dyn_ops,
.regs = &sja1110_regs,
- .qinq_tpid = ETH_P_8021AD,
.tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1110,
.can_limit_mcast_flood = true,
.multiple_cascade_ports = true,
@@ -835,7 +828,6 @@ const struct sja1105_info sja1110b_info = {
.static_ops = sja1110_table_ops,
.dyn_ops = sja1110_dyn_ops,
.regs = &sja1110_regs,
- .qinq_tpid = ETH_P_8021AD,
.tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1110,
.can_limit_mcast_flood = true,
.multiple_cascade_ports = true,
@@ -886,7 +878,6 @@ const struct sja1105_info sja1110c_info = {
.static_ops = sja1110_table_ops,
.dyn_ops = sja1110_dyn_ops,
.regs = &sja1110_regs,
- .qinq_tpid = ETH_P_8021AD,
.tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1110,
.can_limit_mcast_flood = true,
.multiple_cascade_ports = true,
@@ -937,7 +928,6 @@ const struct sja1105_info sja1110d_info = {
.static_ops = sja1110_table_ops,
.dyn_ops = sja1110_dyn_ops,
.regs = &sja1110_regs,
- .qinq_tpid = ETH_P_8021AD,
.tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1110,
.can_limit_mcast_flood = true,
.multiple_cascade_ports = true,
@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ struct sja1105_port {
struct sja1105_tagger_data *data;
struct dsa_port *dp;
bool hwts_tx_en;
- u16 xmit_tpid;
};
enum sja1110_meta_tstamp {
@@ -133,14 +133,44 @@ static struct sk_buff *sja1105_defer_xmit(struct dsa_port *dp,
return NULL;
}
+/* Send VLAN tags with a TPID that blends in with whatever VLAN protocol a
+ * bridge spanning ports of this switch might have.
+ */
static u16 sja1105_xmit_tpid(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
- struct sja1105_port *sp = dp->priv;
+ struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
+ struct dsa_port *other_dp;
+ u16 proto;
+
+ /* Since VLAN awareness is global, then if this port is VLAN-unaware,
+ * all ports are. Use the VLAN-unaware TPID used for tag_8021q.
+ */
+ if (!dsa_port_is_vlan_filtering(dp))
+ return ETH_P_SJA1105;
+
+ /* Port is VLAN-aware, so there is a bridge somewhere (a single one,
+ * we're sure about that). It may not be on this port though, so we
+ * need to find it.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry(other_dp, &ds->dst->ports, list) {
+ if (other_dp->ds != ds)
+ continue;
+
+ if (!other_dp->bridge_dev)
+ continue;
+
+ /* Error is returned only if CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING,
+ * which seems pointless to handle, as our port cannot become
+ * VLAN-aware in that case.
+ */
+ br_vlan_get_proto(other_dp->bridge_dev, &proto);
+
+ return proto;
+ }
- if (unlikely(!dsa_port_is_sja1105(dp)))
- return ETH_P_8021Q;
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "Port is VLAN-aware but cannot find associated bridge!\n");
- return sp->xmit_tpid;
+ return ETH_P_SJA1105;
}
static struct sk_buff *sja1105_imprecise_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
Introduced in commit 38b5beeae7a4 ("net: dsa: sja1105: prepare tagger for handling DSA tags and VLAN simultaneously"), the sja1105_xmit_tpid function solved quite a different problem than our needs are now. Then, we used best-effort VLAN filtering and we were using the xmit_tpid to tunnel packets coming from an 8021q upper through the TX VLAN allocated by tag_8021q to that egress port. The need for a different VLAN protocol depending on switch revision came from the fact that this in itself was more of a hack to trick the hardware into accepting tunneled VLANs in the first place. Right now, we deny 8021q uppers (see sja1105_prechangeupper). Even if we supported them again, we would not do that using the same method of {tunneling the VLAN on egress, retagging the VLAN on ingress} that we had in the best-effort VLAN filtering mode. It seems rather simpler that we just allocate a VLAN in the VLAN table that is simply not used by the bridge at all, or by any other port. Anyway, I have 2 gripes with the current sja1105_xmit_tpid: 1. When sending packets on behalf of a VLAN-aware bridge (with the new TX forwarding offload framework) plus untagged (with the tag_8021q VLAN added by the tagger) packets, we can see that on SJA1105P/Q/R/S and later (which have a qinq_tpid of ETH_P_8021AD), some packets sent through the DSA master have a VLAN protocol of 0x8100 and others of 0x88a8. This is strange and there is no reason for it now. If we have a bridge and are therefore forced to send using that bridge's TPID, we can as well blend with that bridge's VLAN protocol for all packets. 2. The sja1105_xmit_tpid introduces a dependency on the sja1105 driver, because it looks inside dp->priv. It is desirable to keep as much separation between taggers and switch drivers as possible. Now it doesn't do that anymore. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> --- drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105.h | 6 ---- drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c | 10 ------- drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_spi.c | 10 ------- include/linux/dsa/sja1105.h | 1 - net/dsa/tag_sja1105.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)