diff mbox series

[v3] pwm: pwm-samsung: Trigger manual update when disabling PWM

Message ID 20210909101042.17431-1-marten.lindahl@axis.com
State New
Headers show
Series [v3] pwm: pwm-samsung: Trigger manual update when disabling PWM | expand

Commit Message

Mårten Lindahl Sept. 9, 2021, 10:10 a.m. UTC
When duty-cycle is at full level (100%), the TCNTn and TCMPn registers
needs to be flushed in order to disable the signal. The PWM manual does
not say anything about this, but states that only clearing the TCON
auto-reload bit should be needed, and this seems to be true when the PWM
duty-cycle is not at full level. This can be observed on an Axis
ARTPEC-8, by running:

  echo <period> > pwm/period
  echo <period> > pwm/duty_cycle
  echo 1 > pwm/enable
  echo 0 > pwm/enable

Since the TCNTn and TCMPn registers are activated when enabling the PWM
(setting TCON auto-reload bit), and are not touched when disabling the
PWM, the double buffered auto-reload function seems to be still active.
Lowering duty-cycle, and restoring it again in between the enabling and
disabling, makes the disable work since it triggers a reload of the
TCNTn and TCMPn registers.

Fix this by securing a reload of the TCNTn and TCMPn registers when
disabling the PWM and having a full duty-cycle.

Signed-off-by: Mårten Lindahl <marten.lindahl@axis.com>
---

v2:
 - Move fix above setting of disabled_mask

v3:
 - Move up definition of __pwm_samsung_manual_update to avoid
   declaration of the same

 drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Sept. 9, 2021, 10:40 a.m. UTC | #1
On 09/09/2021 12:10, Mårten Lindahl wrote:
> When duty-cycle is at full level (100%), the TCNTn and TCMPn registers
> needs to be flushed in order to disable the signal. The PWM manual does
> not say anything about this, but states that only clearing the TCON
> auto-reload bit should be needed, and this seems to be true when the PWM
> duty-cycle is not at full level. This can be observed on an Axis
> ARTPEC-8, by running:
> 
>   echo <period> > pwm/period
>   echo <period> > pwm/duty_cycle
>   echo 1 > pwm/enable
>   echo 0 > pwm/enable
> 
> Since the TCNTn and TCMPn registers are activated when enabling the PWM
> (setting TCON auto-reload bit), and are not touched when disabling the
> PWM, the double buffered auto-reload function seems to be still active.
> Lowering duty-cycle, and restoring it again in between the enabling and
> disabling, makes the disable work since it triggers a reload of the
> TCNTn and TCMPn registers.
> 
> Fix this by securing a reload of the TCNTn and TCMPn registers when
> disabling the PWM and having a full duty-cycle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mårten Lindahl <marten.lindahl@axis.com>
> ---
> 
> v2:
>  - Move fix above setting of disabled_mask
> 
> v3:
>  - Move up definition of __pwm_samsung_manual_update to avoid
>    declaration of the same
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 


Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>


Best regards,
Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
index f6c528f02d43..f660ec2501fd 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
@@ -117,6 +117,20 @@  static inline unsigned int to_tcon_channel(unsigned int channel)
 	return (channel == 0) ? 0 : (channel + 1);
 }
 
+static void __pwm_samsung_manual_update(struct samsung_pwm_chip *chip,
+				      struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	unsigned int tcon_chan = to_tcon_channel(pwm->hwpwm);
+	u32 tcon;
+
+	tcon = readl(chip->base + REG_TCON);
+	tcon |= TCON_MANUALUPDATE(tcon_chan);
+	writel(tcon, chip->base + REG_TCON);
+
+	tcon &= ~TCON_MANUALUPDATE(tcon_chan);
+	writel(tcon, chip->base + REG_TCON);
+}
+
 static void pwm_samsung_set_divisor(struct samsung_pwm_chip *pwm,
 				    unsigned int channel, u8 divisor)
 {
@@ -276,6 +290,13 @@  static void pwm_samsung_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 	tcon &= ~TCON_AUTORELOAD(tcon_chan);
 	writel(tcon, our_chip->base + REG_TCON);
 
+	/*
+	 * In case the PWM is at 100% duty cycle, force a manual
+	 * update to prevent the signal from staying high.
+	 */
+	if (readl(our_chip->base + REG_TCMPB(pwm->hwpwm)) == (u32)-1U)
+		__pwm_samsung_manual_update(our_chip, pwm);
+
 	our_chip->disabled_mask |= BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&samsung_pwm_lock, flags);
@@ -284,18 +305,11 @@  static void pwm_samsung_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 static void pwm_samsung_manual_update(struct samsung_pwm_chip *chip,
 				      struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
-	unsigned int tcon_chan = to_tcon_channel(pwm->hwpwm);
-	u32 tcon;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&samsung_pwm_lock, flags);
 
-	tcon = readl(chip->base + REG_TCON);
-	tcon |= TCON_MANUALUPDATE(tcon_chan);
-	writel(tcon, chip->base + REG_TCON);
-
-	tcon &= ~TCON_MANUALUPDATE(tcon_chan);
-	writel(tcon, chip->base + REG_TCON);
+	__pwm_samsung_manual_update(chip, pwm);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&samsung_pwm_lock, flags);
 }