| Message ID | a131c99933f5dd7eefbd39358a2dc2b13663ca7b.1437999691.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Monday, July 27, 2015 05:58:06 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Its better to use __func__ to print functions name instead of writing > the name in the print statement. This also has the advantage that a > change in function's name doesn't force us to change the print message > as well. > > Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> OK, this is simple enough. Applied, thanks! > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index 46251e8d30f2..f620055279f3 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -2074,8 +2074,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > if (!try_module_get(policy->governor->owner)) > return -EINVAL; > > - pr_debug("__cpufreq_governor for CPU %u, event %u\n", > - policy->cpu, event); > + pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u, event %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu, event); > > mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock); > if ((policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START) >
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 46251e8d30f2..f620055279f3 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2074,8 +2074,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (!try_module_get(policy->governor->owner)) return -EINVAL; - pr_debug("__cpufreq_governor for CPU %u, event %u\n", - policy->cpu, event); + pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u, event %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu, event); mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock); if ((policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)