Message ID | 1444298504-10392-4-git-send-email-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi AKASHI, [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc4 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore] config: arm64-allmodconfig (attached as .config) reproduce: wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # save the attached .config to linux build tree make.cross ARCH=arm64 Note: the linux-review/AKASHI-Takahiro/arm64-ftrace-fix-incorrect-output-from-stack-tracer HEAD f6c03913c640aa1d196348c49f15cfdc264393e0 builds fine. It only hurts bisectibility. All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c: In function 'save_trace': >> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:93:29: error: 'return_to_handler' undeclared (first use in this function) if (addr == (unsigned long)return_to_handler - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE) { ^ arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:93:29: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in >> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:101:4: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct ftrace_ret_stack' current->ret_stack[data->ret_stack_index--].ret ^ >> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:101:22: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type current->ret_stack[data->ret_stack_index--].ret ^ vim +/return_to_handler +93 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c 87 { 88 struct stack_trace_data *data = d; 89 struct stack_trace *trace = data->trace; 90 unsigned long addr = frame->pc; 91 92 #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER > 93 if (addr == (unsigned long)return_to_handler - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE) { 94 /* 95 * This is a case where function graph tracer has 96 * modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame 97 * to hook a function return. 98 * So replace it to an original value. 99 */ 100 frame->pc = addr = > 101 current->ret_stack[data->ret_stack_index--].ret 102 - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE; 103 } 104 #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */ --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
On 10/14/2015 12:24 AM, Jungseok Lee wrote: > On Oct 8, 2015, at 7:01 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > Hi Akashi, > >> Function graph tracer modifies a return address (LR) in a stack frame >> to hook a function return. This will result in many useless entries >> (return_to_handler) showing up in a stack tracer's output. >> >> This patch replaces such entries with originals values preserved in >> current->ret_stack[]. >> >> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> > > The following diff should be folded into this patch, not [7/7] one, to > address build breakage. Thanks. I fixed all the build errors reported by kbuild test robot. -Takahiro AKASHI > ----8<---- > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c > index 407991b..7126d4d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > */ > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/export.h> > +#include <linux/ftrace.h> > #include <linux/sched.h> > #include <linux/stacktrace.h> > ----8<---- > > Best Regards > Jungseok Lee > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h index 2b43e20..b7d597c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ struct dyn_arch_ftrace { extern unsigned long ftrace_graph_call; +extern void return_to_handler(void); + static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr) { /* diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c index bc0689a..1555a8b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ struct stack_trace_data { struct stack_trace *trace; unsigned int no_sched_functions; unsigned int skip; +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER + unsigned int ret_stack_index; +#endif }; static int save_trace(struct stackframe *frame, void *d) @@ -86,6 +89,20 @@ static int save_trace(struct stackframe *frame, void *d) struct stack_trace *trace = data->trace; unsigned long addr = frame->pc; +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER + if (addr == (unsigned long)return_to_handler - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE) { + /* + * This is a case where function graph tracer has + * modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame + * to hook a function return. + * So replace it to an original value. + */ + frame->pc = addr = + current->ret_stack[data->ret_stack_index--].ret + - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE; + } +#endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */ + if (data->no_sched_functions && in_sched_functions(addr)) return 0; if (data->skip) { @@ -105,6 +122,9 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace) data.trace = trace; data.skip = trace->skip; +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER + data.ret_stack_index = current->curr_ret_stack; +#endif if (tsk != current) { data.no_sched_functions = 1;
Function graph tracer modifies a return address (LR) in a stack frame to hook a function return. This will result in many useless entries (return_to_handler) showing up in a stack tracer's output. This patch replaces such entries with originals values preserved in current->ret_stack[]. Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 2 ++ arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)