@@ -171,10 +171,6 @@ void gov_queue_work(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
int i;
- mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
- if (!policy->governor_enabled)
- goto out_unlock;
-
if (!all_cpus) {
/*
* Use raw_smp_processor_id() to avoid preemptible warnings.
@@ -188,9 +184,6 @@ void gov_queue_work(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus)
__gov_queue_work(i, dbs_data, delay);
}
-
-out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gov_queue_work);
@@ -229,13 +222,24 @@ static void dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = container_of(work, struct cpu_dbs_info,
dwork.work);
struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared = cdbs->shared;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = shared->policy;
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data;
unsigned int sampling_rate, delay;
bool modify_all = true;
mutex_lock(&shared->timer_mutex);
+ policy = shared->policy;
+
+ /*
+ * Governor might already be disabled and there is no point continuing
+ * with the work-handler.
+ */
+ if (!policy)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+
if (dbs_data->cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
@@ -252,6 +256,7 @@ static void dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
delay = dbs_data->cdata->gov_dbs_timer(cdbs, dbs_data, modify_all);
gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy, delay, modify_all);
+unlock:
mutex_unlock(&shared->timer_mutex);
}
@@ -478,9 +483,17 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (!shared || !shared->policy)
return -EBUSY;
+ /*
+ * Work-handler must see this updated, as it should not proceed any
+ * further after governor is disabled. And so timer_mutex is taken while
+ * updating this value.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&shared->timer_mutex);
+ shared->policy = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(&shared->timer_mutex);
+
gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
- shared->policy = NULL;
mutex_destroy(&shared->timer_mutex);
return 0;
}
gov_queue_work() acquires cpufreq_governor_lock to allow cpufreq_governor_stop() to drain delayed work items possibly scheduled on CPUs that share the policy with a CPU being taken offline. However, the same goal may be achieved in a more straightforward way if the policy pointer in the struct cpu_dbs_info matching the policy CPU is reset upfront by cpufreq_governor_stop() under the timer_mutex belonging to it and checked against NULL, under the same lock, at the beginning of dbs_timer(). In that case every instance of dbs_timer() run for a struct cpu_dbs_info sharing the policy pointer in question after cpufreq_governor_stop() has started will notice that that pointer is NULL and bail out immediately without queuing up any new work items. In turn, gov_cancel_work() called by cpufreq_governor_stop() before destroying timer_mutex will wait for all of the delayed work items currently running on the CPUs sharing the policy to drop the mutex, so it may be destroyed safely. Make cpufreq_governor_stop() and dbs_timer() work as described and modify gov_queue_work() so it does not acquire cpufreq_governor_lock any more. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- @Rafael: Please apply this patch alone for now, let me work out with the timer/work thing first before applying other patches. V3->V4: - Updated changelog as suggested by Rafael. drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) -- 2.6.2.198.g614a2ac -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html